Royal Duchess Meghan Completely Unmasked

Global commercial finance is a deadly weapon.

Geopolitics represents the iron will to pull the trigger.

The covert object of the art of politics, of course, is to utilize euphemism, emotionalism, and all manner of psychologically manipulative deception – with the ends justifying whatever means – to not only persuade or outright trick the targeted populations into consenting to their own enslavement at the hands of the ruling elite thirteen Jesuit families but to demand it.

The royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha – led by the reigning monarch of Britain, Queen Elizabeth II – well understands the great utility of this Machiavellian tactic and, over the last two centuries, they have deployed it to great effect.

Most recently, in the 21st century, with the help of CIA, MI5, MI6, and MI7 (BBC) in gaining unlimited access and even some measure of influential control over the MSM, the royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (AKA Windsor, Hanover, Rothschild, Rockefeller) have cleverly used the ongoing marital saga of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex – in combination with the Covid-19 psychological operation and the “climate change” agenda – to thoroughly distract the public from their ultimate objective: bringing the UN’s “sustainability” goals of Agenda 2030 to complete fruition; a grand agenda which entails global human resource depopulation, the elimination of entire human resource employment sectors, and the global implementation of a universal blockchain digital crypto-currency system conceptually based on the total surveillance of human body activity while acting in symbiosis with artificial intelligence.

The following information, excerpted from a CDC document entitled “2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCOV) Rea-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel,” underscores the premise that the Covid-19 “pandemic” was created as a grand Trojan horse to conceal a global effort to place human consciousness under the draconian influence of a centrally controlling artificial intelligence apparatus.

Though the CDC published the first version of this document on July 13, 2020, the amended version of December 1, 2020, on page 42, under the subheading of “Performance Characteristics”, states: “Since no quantified virus isolates of the 2019-nCoV are currently available, assays {diagnostic tests} designed for detection of the 2019-nCoV RNA were tested with characterized stocks of in vitro transcribed full length RNA…”

SEE: https://www.fda.gov/media/134922/download

The first line of the preceding excerpt appears to clearly indicate the CDC is admitting to the fact they have not comprehensively or quantifiably isolated any measurable samples of the “Covid” virus under laboratory conditions.

Therefore, to objectively interpret from their own published document – for all intents and purposes – it would appear, the CDC is also admitting to the world at large the “Covid-19” virus does not and has never existed.

To everyone who frequents this site, it has also become clear, the Covid-19 “vaccines” are merely delivery devices to implement a digital form of human genetic therapy, with the genetic information of human resources efficiently stored in a global “Digital Library” hosted by the United Nations.

SEE: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/3894424?In=en

The detailed substance of a pair of recently published articles – one at thesun.com and the other at goodtoknow.com – would appear to support the premise of the thesis that the Duke of Sussex and “Megahn Markle” were matrimonially paired to serve ulterior purposes.

The first, published at the sun.com, details Queen Elizabeth’s decision to strip both the Duke and Duchess of Sussex of their royal titles while the second, published at goodto.com, reports “Prince Harry could ‘address rumors’ Prince Charles isn’t his father in new memoir.”

Regarding the Duchess of Sussex – “Meghan Markle” – it shall soon be revealed that further and extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analyses confirms, the “Duchess” is not only the hidden face behind the mask of the fabricated character scheme known as American congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, she also is a fabricated character scheme portrayed by another European royal, a princess of the ancient Italian royal House of Borromeo who is married to the eldest son – Prince Pierre Casiraghi (AKA ABC newsman David Muir) – of the “late” Prince Stefano Casiraghi Grimaldi (AKA George W. Bush/Hollywood actors Martin Sheen, James Dean/Donald Trump/current US president Joe Biden/MSM newsman Brian Williams).

SEE: FDR: America’s Royal Hollywood Fraud 

Below: Princess Beatrice Borromeo of Monaco’s House of Grimaldi, Duchess of Sussex Meghan Markle, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez  

CONSTITUIONAL RIGHTS WERE NEVER MEANT FOR “COMMON” MAN

Surely, those who frequent this site have pondered notions as to why the Covid-19 “vaccines” have been mandated for the entirety of the American population but not for their congressional representatives and “elected” senators inhabiting Washington D.C.?

Those who’ve bothered to read the content published in the series of articles entitled “How Crown Temple Rules America” know very well why this should be so.

SEE: How Crown Temple Rules America

The constitution of the US corporation was meant to implement a system of private law which was never meant for the “common” man but rather for the commercial law merchants operating as “government”. It is a legal document couched in legal terms used by attorneys (esquires) called to the Temple Bar rather than the standard vernacular used by the “common” man. The governmental and judicial systems – both federal and state (estate) – are owned by the Crown Temple in the City of London (one square mile).

This is also why, there exists a reflecting pool in Washington’s District of Columbia.

While the reflecting pool’s esoteric symbolism is masonic in nature, it was designed to symbolically demonstrate that, like Vatican City, Washington D.C. is a private city state and it’s system of corporate governance reflects the legal and banking systems established by the Crown Temple’s four Inns of Court (Gray’s Inn, Lincoln’s Inn, Middle and Inner Temple).

Below: reflecting pool, Washington D.C.

Inside both the House of Representatives and the Senate chamber is displayed the Roman Fasces, symbolic of Pax Romana (Roman Empire), the global rule of the Vatican in Rome, which is hidden behind the United Nations, the Holy See (Swiss National Bank) and the World Economic Forum.

While the international Brotherhood of Freemasons are controlled by the Jesuit order, it is the Society of Jesus which secretly controls the Vatican in Rome. Since the 13th century, the royal families of Britain and of Europe have been sworn in fealty to the Vatican pontiff (white pope/Jesuit Jorge Mario Bergoglio AKA Prince Stefano Massimo) who merely acts as an emissary of the black pope, the current Jesuit Superior General, Arturo Marcelino Sosa Abascal SJ.

QUEEN STRIPS ROYAL TITLES?

According to an article recently published at thesun.com, Queen Elizabeth II has decided to strip both the Duke and Duchess of Sussex (Prince Harry/”Meghan Markle” AKA Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez) of their respective royal titles.

“The Queen was left with ‘no choice’ but to strip Harry & Meghan of their titles as the Duke wanted to ‘live a life free of responsibility’.” Author Joseph Gamp goes on to report, “Royal commentator Dylan Howard said Harry’s grandmother the Queen took back the titles as they decided to step away – despite them publicly backing notable causes such as paternity leave for US mothers and climate change. Speaking in 2021 documentary, ‘Secrets Of The Royal’ – The Markles vs. The Monarchy, Mr. Howard said: ‘I think Harry wanted to have it both ways. He wanted to be able to live a life free of responsibility but still make change’. And the reality was, the Sussexes in another country are isolated from everything the Royal family means – And that puts the Royal Family at peril. So, the Queen had no choice but to strip them of the titles.”

Added to this, in June of 2021, an article published at marieclaire.com reported Prince Charles (AKA Keith Richards/Bruce Springsteen/Al Pacino/Cat Stevens), the reigning Queen’s successor, “has made it clear to Prince Harry and Meghan Markle that their children will not receive royal titles when he becomes king.”

SEE: https://www.the-sun.com/lifestyle/3904295/queen-hospital-latest-news-health-what-happens-charles-william/

SEE also: https://www.marieclaire.com/celebrity/a36777656/prince-charles-wont-allow-archie-to-be-a-prince/

But consider for a moment – what if? – this ongoing melodramatic saga of the Duke and Duchess of Sussex has been nothing more than a media-driven ruse, a cynical ploy, manufactured and concocted to hide an ulterior political agenda in which the royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha are heavily invested.

What if, the Duke and Duchess were never granted titles from Queen Elizabeth II and, to begin with, their “marriage” was created as a smokescreen, a fraudulent media-driven distraction to hide ulterior political motives, a storybook spectacle designed for the rabid consumption of the gaping but unsuspecting public?

Could this have been because the Duke of Sussex was born a bastard, and the woman alleged to be his “spouse”, “Meghan Markle” (AKA Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez), already held a royal title, having been born into another royal house which was native to another European country, a young, attractive, and vivacious royal figure, with a charismatic and media-savvy personality, someone who, while already comfortably accustomed to the public limelight, was potentially considered to be an ideal political and intelligence asset in America?

After all, with both the aging Prince Charles and Prince William, Harry’s elder sibling, standing supreme in the line of royal succession behind the ailing Elizabeth II, it seems doubtful the Duke of Sussex could ever have a genuine chance at being crowned monarch within the span of his lifetime.

Could it be, therefore, in a bit of crafty and heavily calculated maneuvering, the Royal Family sought to utilize Prince Henry (AKA Harry) of Wales in another capacity – in tandem with another effective royal intelligence asset – which nevertheless would remain ultimately beneficial to their interests?

Yet another article, published at goodtoknow.com, entitled “Prince Harry could ‘address rumors’ Prince Charles isn’t his father in new memoir”, would appear to support the shocking premise that Harry, the Duke of Sussex, was not the biological son of Prince Charles.

Reports author Selina Maycock, “Prince Harry could set the record straight and ‘address rumors’ that Prince Charles isn’t his father as he prepares to release an explosive autobiography. The Duke of Sussex has confirmed that he is writing a tell-all memoir after signing a multi-million pound deal with publishers Penguin Random House – and plans to give proceeds to the charities he has supported over the years. It comes after months of turbulence and tension following Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s tell-all interview with Oprah Winfrey.”

Regarding “Oprah Winfrey”, an article exposing her as a fabricated character scheme – one who, for decades, has been portrayed by a former television actress and MTV pop star who is now employed as an MSM news anchor – will very soon be published.

Meanwhile, the article at goodtoknow.com goes on to inform, “And rumors have circulated for years that the Prince of Wales is not the biological father, with claims in the infamous dialogue of royal scandals that Major James Hewitt, a former boyfriend of the late Princess Diana, is his real father.”

In addition, reports goodtoknow.com, “Earlier this year Prince Harry wrote a deeply personal letter to his father Prince Charles ahead of attending Prince Phillip’s funeral, following his claims that his {biological} father had ‘stopped taking his calls’ since he quit the UK.”

SEE: https://www.goodto.com/royal-news/prince-harry-could-address-rumours-prince-charles-isnt-his-father-in-new-memoir-615804/

All of the aforementioned begs the question, if the Duke of Sussex was, as rumor would have it, the biological son of a naval officer, someone who the Royal Family would likely consider a “commoner”, would such a discovery, from the outset, have jeopardized his right to be granted royal title?

ROYAL HOUSE OF BORROMEO

The ancient Royal House of Borromeo has quite a storied history.

According to Wikipedia, “the aristocratic Borromeo family were merchants in San Miniato around 1300 and became bankers in Milan after 1370. Vitaliano de’ Vitaliani, who acquired the name of Borromeo from his uncle Giovanni, became the count of Arona in 1445. His descendants played important roles in the politics of the Duchy of Milan and as cardinals in the Catholic Reformation. In 1916 the head of the family was granted the title of Prince of Angera by the King of Italy.”

Over the span of several centuries, the royal House of Borromeo has enjoyed a close and favorable relationship with the Vatican and were granted their name (Buon Romei) because of their origins from the city of Rome.

Also, several of its family members were entitled cardinals and Archbishops. Wikipedia confirms, “The best known members of the {Borromeo} family were the cardinals and Archbishops of Milan, Carlo (1538-1584), who was canonized by Pope Paul V in 1610, and Federico (1564-1631), who founded the Ambrosian Library. The figure of the Borromean rings, which forms part of the family’s coat of arms, is well known in the diverse fields of topology, psychoanalysis and theology. The first member of the family to come to prominence was Filippo who, backed by Holy Roman emperor Charles IV and Gian Galeazzo Visconti, (later to become Duke of Milan), led the Ghibellines of San Miniato in their 1367 revolt against the Florentine Guelphs. In 1370 he was taken prisoner by the Florentines and decapitated. He left five children who had taken refuge in Milan at he time of the revolt. The sons Borromeo and Giovanni founded the Borromei Bank in Milan, with other family members running banks in Venice and Florence.”

PRINCESS BEATRICE BORROMEO

According to Wikipedia, “Donna Beatrice Borromeo Arese Taverna (born 18 August 1985, in San Candido) is an Italian journalist and fashion model. Born into an Italian aristocratic family, she graduated from Bocconi University and Columbia University.”

Beatrice’s resume as a journalist includes stints with several prestigious European publications as well as Newsweek, while during her career as a fashion model, “she became the 2021 ambassador of Dior.”

It should also be noted, in 2015, Princess Beatrice was “sanctioned Special Envoy for Human Rights for F4D (Fashion for Development) and considers herself to be an atheist and leftist.”

As for the princess’s immediate family, Wikipedia also reports, “Borromeo has an older brother, Carlo Ludovico Borromeo, who is married to Marta Ferri. She has three older half-sisters from her father’s marriage to German model Marion Sybil Zota. Isabella, married to Count Ugo Brachetti Peretti; Lavinia, married to John Elkann, and Matilde, married to Prince Antonius zu Furstenberg.”

Turns out, Princess Beatrice Borromeo has more than one connection to the von Furstenberg royal family, to the long historical succession of Holy Roman emperors, and to the Dukes of Swabia. Reportedly, Princess Beatrice’s husband, Prince Pierre Casiraghi Grimaldi – who after extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analyses has been identified as the host actor (live-action role player) in portrayal of the fabricated character scheme known as ABC news anchorman “David Muir” – got his own start in the business of journalism while working with the legendary “Diane Sawyer”.

Below: Prince Pierre Casiraghi Grimaldi, ABC news anchor David Muir

Recently, while at the ABC anchor desk, which is owned by Disney, the company bearing the name of Tassilo zu von Furstenberg (AKA Walt Disney/Walter Cronkite/Franklin Delano Roosevelt/Harry Truman/Jimmy Stewart/Henry Fonda/Fred Astaire/Al Jolson/Glen Miller), “David Muir” (AKA Prince Pierre Casiraghi Grimaldi) has been responsible for regurgitating some of the most cringe inducing Covid-19 “pandemic” propaganda this side of CNN, while his MSM mentor, “Diane Sawyer”, in 2012, was involved with widely promoting the Sandy Hook Massacre hoax.   

Sawyer’s spouse is Hollywood director “Mike Nichols”, another fabricated character scheme – strategically donned with a luxuriant hair piece – portrayed by Hollywood executive Barry Diller (AKA Prince Eduard Egon von Furstenberg Hohenlohe/former US president Dwight D. Eisenhower/Alfred Hitchcock/Oliver Stone).

 

As for “Diane Sawyer”, she exists as a modified fabricated character scheme (blonde hair dye/contact lenses) and also possesses an identically located and conspicuous epidermal landmark (observed in the images posted below just above the collar bone and below the left side of the chin) in common with her host actor (live-action role player) Princess Diane von Furstenberg. 

Turns out, as well, Princess Beatrice Borromeo also possess a conspicuous and identically placed epidermal landmark, located just beneath the right side of the chin, in common with the pair of fabricated character schemes she portrays: “Meghan Markle”, Duchess of Sussex, and US congresswoman “Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez”.  

 

Don’t forget to visit https://worldnewsspell.com/shop for t-shirts, coffee mugs, hoodies and much more!