In the hands of those who govern, a comprehensive understanding of the human mind, how it perceives, interprets experiences can become a most useful tool. In the hands of a tyrannical government with totalitarian designs, such knowledge, when used strategically, can be utilized as a weapon far more powerful, effective, and perhaps even more destructive than any gun, bomb, or missile. During the Roman imperial era, the ruling Caesars realized that, over the long term, a meticulously well-planned psychological warfare campaign was more effective and less costly in maintaining control over populations than having to rely upon the loyalties of occupying legions of armies.
In our modern era, this same sort of knowledge is still highly valued by those inhabiting the halls of governance.
When it comes to successfully executing psychological warfare upon population groups, those who govern today have distinct advantages over Roman emperors of old: exclusive access to the MSM (mainstream media) while social media platforms, acting as augmenting propaganda organs, are programmed to influence, manufacture public, political consensus.
Properly weaponized with a combination of verbal priming, neuro-linguistic programming, emotional, dramatic emphasis, and when exposure is broadened to maximum saturation levels while reinforced by repetition, the MSM’s prevailing ‘news’ narratives have the capability to not only capture and to hold the attentions of intended audiences, but to destabilize, immobilize, and to reshape, mold hearts and minds among the general public into any desired formulation.
Seized, galvanized by emotional hysteria, ridden with psychological demoralization, the public’s powers of rational discernment are compromised, disabled. Rendered psychologically, emotionally vulnerable, the public is left unequipped to comprehend that its thoughts, subsequently adopted behaviors have been sufficiently altered, transformed towards embracing the ulterior objectives of the MSM’s propagandists.
Lately, of course, the American public’s malleable attentions have been held captive, dominated by the ongoing ‘war’ in Gaza, Palestine, and with the accompanying ‘protests’ which have appeared to spring up on college campuses.
As was pointed out in a previously published article – Middle East’s War Simulation Spectacle – the ‘war’ alleged to be taking place in Gaza, Palestine is nothing more than a stage-managed, televised simulation, a psychological operation replete with actors and Hollywood-styled props, a grandly conceived smokescreen contrived to hide ulterior objectives which are, namely, the ongoing global implementation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen ‘sustainability goals’ – goals which run counter to the specific economic interests of American citizens among the working and middle classes and to the interests of humanity in general. Added to more information which supports these findings, later, the true identity of a prime perpetrator in Gaza’s war charade shall be revealed.
Turns out, an alleged former leader of Mossad-created Palestinian ‘terror’ group Hamas – “Khaled Mashal” – is a renowned Hollywood actor in disguise.
SELLING, MARKETING THE PRODUCT OF WAR
Although a majority of the American public may not recognize it, the concept of war is sold, marketed in a similar or even identical fashion to other commercially available products.
The current Israel-Palestine ‘conflict’ has proved to be no exception.
From the standpoint of objective observation, the identical techniques employed by Madison Avenue advertising firms, albeit tweaked, modified for maximum appeal to the ideological, political biases of targeted audience demographics, are used to sell a war or, perhaps better to say, the idea, appearances of war.
An unholy partnership between Madison Avenue and the US military/industrial complex has become a decades long tradition. Since the World War II era, modern advertising techniques have been employed to manufacture both public opinion and the public’s consent in support of US involvement in wars overseas. In 2007, the Rand Corporation, an American-headquartered non-profit global policy think tank, research institute, and public sector consulting firm, issued a publication – ‘Enlisting Madison Avenue, The Marketing Approach to Earning Popular Support in Theaters of Operation’ – outlining the utility, usefulness of business-styled marketing to promote war.
SEE: https://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/MG607.html
“Business marketing practices provide a useful framework,” declares Rand’s publication, “for improving U.S. military efforts to shape the attitudes and behaviors of local populations in a theater of operations as well as those of a broader international audience.”
Rand’s use of the phrase “theater of operations” appears curiously telltale, if not sinister, a clever linguistic, semantical juxtaposition which, while on its surface, though appearing to imply one thing, means to indicate something else entirely that is not immediately apparent. Nevertheless, when viewed objectively and contextually removed, unburdened from manipulative, military-styled jargon, the true implications of the words “theater of operations” become quite transparent. When reconsidered within such contextual transparency, the word “theater” implies a theatrical production meant to simulate conditions, appearances of war based on the psychologically conditioned expectations of targeted U.S. audiences. When contextually positioned in relation to the concept of theatrical production, the word “operations” entails the execution of psychological operations which have been planned, scripted, and staged. Therefore, when reconsidered within the fullness of this particular context, “theater of operations” is deployed, as Rand’s publication states, “for improving U.S. military efforts to shape the attitudes and behaviors of local populations…”
With America in the midst of severe economic downsizing, suffering under the effects of the implementation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen sustainability goals, similar ongoing efforts – manufacturing appearances of a ‘war’ in Palestine to incite college campus ‘protests’ which appear to greet “Pro-Palestinian” and “Pro-Israel” factions in confrontational, even violent opposition – are now being applied, executed domestically, as Rand corporation would have it, “to shape the attitudes and behaviors of local populations…”
To what end?
Analysis appears to indicate the overall objective is as follows: by means of influence through deliberately engineered chaos in the form of a well-conceived series of psychological operations sold to the public as crises, to accelerate targeted populations’ acceptance of a globally centralized political/economic order in the controlling hands of the UN – a front for the City of London’s Crown Temple, Vatican/Swiss banking consortium – and to secure the masses eventual acceptance of selectively depopulated human resource pools enclosed within densely packed urban habitats equipped with maximum security surveillance capabilities, erected in tandem with a global ‘smart’ surveillance grid governed by artificial intelligence systems.
HIDDEN HAND BEHIND STUDENT ‘PROTESTS’
The recent rash of student protests on college campuses have not sprung up organically, neither can the participating protest groups be characterized as ‘grassroots’. Research indicates that sources of funding, financial support for some of the student protest groups activated to cause chaos on selected college campuses are linked to the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and Foundations Platform f20, a global network of over eighty private foundations – including Ford Foundation, Foundation of Prince Albert II of Monaco – which, not surprisingly, are collectively lobbying for the implementation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen sustainability goals.
According to an article published at newsnationnow.com, though Within Our Lifetime, a pro-Palestine protest organization which, in April, held a rally on the campus of Columbia University and ominously called for “resistance by any means necessary,” has no tax filings on record, the group’s founder, Nerdeen Kiswani, 29, has taken advantage of New York state tax law allowing non-profits with a 501(c)(3) status to collect tax free donations from larger organizations.
The article at newsnationnow.com reports that as a result of this tax loophole, Within Our Lifetime legally receives it fiscal sponsorship and collects donations through Westchester People’s Action Coalition Foundation, a ‘social justice’ (Marxist) activist organization established in 1974. The article also informs that other student protest groups with laborious monikers such as If Not Now, Jewish Voice for Peace, both pro-Palestine rights organizations, have received sizable funding from the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund.
SEE: https://newsnationnow.com/world/israel-palestine/who-is-organizing-pro-palestine-protests/
Regarding the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund, it has a long and rich history of meddling in domestic, foreign, and geopolitical affairs. Not coincidentally, the Rockefeller Foundation – as differentiated from RBF – was responsible for commissioning Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development, a document issued in 2010 including a section entitled “Operation Lockstep”, which later served as a virtual blueprint for the execution of the Covid-19 “pandemic” psychological operation.
SEE: https://archive.org/details/rockefeller-foundation-lock-step
Founded in 1940, RBF commissioned a study conceived by its then president, Nelson Rockefeller, which was conducted from 1956 to 1960 to analyze perceived challenges facing the United States. Henry Kissinger (AKA Hollywood executive David Geffen), an avid supporter of global depopulation, was appointed to head, direct the project. According to Wikipedia, during this time, “seven panels were constituted that looked at issues including military strategy, foreign policy, international economic strategy, and the nuclear arms race.”
Greater and in-depth research demonstrates that, at the moment, the Rockefellers are utilizing student protest groups/agitators to achieve ulterior and grander goals. The RBF’s mission statement, however, doesn’t hide its true objectives in unwavering support of the UN’s economically transformational, genocidal Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen sustainability goals: “To advance social change that contributes to a more just, sustainable, and peaceful world.”
The question is: ‘just’, ‘sustainable’, and ‘peaceful’ for whom, exactly?
Guaranteed, though such terms may chime with a noble ring, when subjected to greater scrutiny, the corrosive tarnish hidden beneath the shining veneer cannot remain obscured for very long.
Not only does the Rockefeller Brother’s Fund sit on the steering committee of the aforementioned Foundations Platform f20, but the fund’s president, Steven Heintz, a graduate of Yale University – home to Jesuit/masonic grand lodge #322 – is a standing member of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations), a front for the Vatican Jesuit’s Society of Jesus and its Superior General.
RBF’s chairwoman, Valerie Rockefeller, serves as co-chair of BankFWD, which, according to Wikipedia, is “a network to persuade banks to phase out fossil fuels and to lead on climate.”
In addition, Valerie Rockefeller is also a member of the board of trustees at Columbia University, the very campus where the RFB-funded Within Our Lifetime staged their ‘protest’ in April of 2024.
With the proliferation of student protests, protester encampments on college campuses across America, university deans have opted to cancel on campus events and even decided to move entire semesters of classes online.
“Many universities have cancelled commencement events,” confirms newsnationnow.com, “moved the remainder of the semester to online learning…”
The latter part of that statement concerning ‘online learning’ unwittingly reveals the successful achievement of a covert objective in relation to the staged campus protests.
GAZA RECONSTRUCTION MECHANISM
As was pointed out in Middle East’s War Simulation Spectacle, not only is the entire region of Gaza, Palestine being rebuilt, reconsolidated into a digital ‘smart’ grid, complete with UN ‘smart’ cities monitored by surveillance systems controlled, programmed by artificial intelligence, but NGO’s (non-government organizations), non-profit organizations, and military contractors connected with and subordinate to the UN have collaborated efforts to set up online digital learning platforms for universities in Gaza as well. The overall significance of this simultaneous development seems to have largely escaped the notice of the MSM. But there can be no doubt, given the specifically identified patterning of recent events, that the psychological conditioning of generations now coming of age towards accepting remote, digital classroom learning environments controlled by artificial intelligence systems as the ‘new normal’ has not only accelerated but stands as yet another prime example of the woeful manifestation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050.
Nevertheless, if one is willing to dig deeply enough to discover them, there do exist accounts from some mainstream media sources – albeit, in the form of a limited hangout – which confirm that the ‘war’ in Gaza is merely an elaborately created theatrical smokescreen for the region’s ongoing reconstruction and transformation into a UN mandated ‘smart’ zone, surveillance grid to be controlled by artificial intelligence systems.
An article published at Bloomberg.com, entitled “Why the Gaza Strip May Be the City of the Future,” reports, “The complex intimacy of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has turned the region into something of a proving ground for purpose-built surveillance technology that could be plugged into a future smart city. Indeed, Israeli companies are selling cybersecurity technology all over the world, including the U.S., where it’s used in a new training center in Baltimore.”
Bloomberg also reports that Gaza’s transformation into a UN ‘smart’ city began back in 2014.
“Since 2014,” Bloomberg reveals, “Gaza’s reconstruction has been managed through an online database called the Gaza Reconstruction Mechanism.”
Regarding GRM, its project undertakings are overseen by UNOPS (United Nations Office of Project Services) in cooperation with UNDAF (United Nations Development Assistance).
The theme of the article appearing at Bloomberg – https://www.bloomberg.com/news/features/2021-09-27/why-the-gaza-strip-may-be-the-city-of-the-future – reflects a dystopian idea, taken from a recently published book, Open Gaza: Architectures of Hope, published by Terreform’s imprint Urban Research, that the war-torn conditions of Gaza will spread to the West and to the rest of the world.
Terreform’s website claims, “We are an independent non-profit studio investigating form, policies, technologies and practices to create a more equitable, sustainable, and beautiful future for our urbanizing planet.”
As if there is anything remotely beautiful about humanity becoming eternally enslaved within the UN’s dystopian gulags.
“As brittle regimes are wracked by crises,” exclaims Bloomberg, “mass immigrations harden borders and infrastructure buckles, Open Gaza suggests that the world may start to look more and more like Gaza.”
The preceding quote smacks of sheer mockery meant for a bewildered, impressionable public. Nonetheless, one must always be on guard for poisoned pens wielded by the backstabbing MSM. In the sneaky manner of the intellectually disingenuous, while Bloomberg pretends not to know that crises, both in Gaza and the U.S., have been deliberately engineered psychological operations to legitimize the UN’s continued global implementation of Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen sustainability goals, yet, in the very same article, Bloomberg lets it slip that the NSA (National Security Agency) “used the Iraq war to develop domestic surveillance systems.”
FACE 2 FACE WITH “KHALED MASHAL”
According to Wikipedia, Khaled Mashal was a Palestinian political leader and the former head of the militant ‘terror’ organization Hamas.
In 1992, Mashal became a founding member of Hamas Politburo and its chairman and, later, in the spring of 2004, was recognized as the head of Hamas. The term politburo derives from Marxism-Leninism. “Within the political context of one-party states,” informs Wikipedia, “a politburo is defined as the central committee in communist parties and is present in most former and existing communist states.”
Marxism or ‘social justice’ is a political concept derived from Jesuit scholar Luigi Taparelli d’ Azeglio. Taparelli believed in centralized governance and the governing hegemony, by divine right, of Papal rule (feudal system of elite aristocratic/monarchial ownership of land, capital) over matters both spiritual and temporal and the distribution of capital to the dependent proletariat in the form of charity. Political ideologies, regardless of label or party affiliation, are firmly founded on the idea that the individual intent on exercising freedom of will must be governed, made dependent on those controlling the requisite capital – ownership of land, human, natural resources, control over military/police security – capable of maintaining societal, political order. While Marxism-Leninism appeared to preach belief in the idea that a ‘workers revolution’ would lead to proletarian liberation at the hands of the bourgeoise, the ensuing chaos effected by violent revolution only served to justify, bolster centralized hegemonic control of those in whose powerful hands the requisite ownership capital to maintain societal/political order rested.
At its ideological, philosophical root, Marxism entails the elimination of private property ownership for the proletariat and the transformation of humanity-at-large into a soulless collective bereft of free will, one submissively obedient to a centralized governing structure which maintains iron fisted control over the division of labor, distribution of capital. In the case where governance declares itself as a republican democracy, while the masses are psychologically conditioned to believe the right to vote in government sanctioned elections is equivalent to securing “freedom” or “liberty”, they have only been tricked by a centrally-controlled, corporately owned “two-party” system’s alluring disguise, an ideological trap – the illusion of freedom of choice – set up for them by City of London’s Crown Temple and the Swiss banking consortium. According to Black’s Law dictionary, the term “republic” is defined as a corporately owned structure. It follows then, that the term ‘democratic republic’ is merely another ideological veil, behind which hides monopolized control over the distribution of capital, and centralized hegemony over social, political order, manifesting itself as a more benign, humane formulation of ‘social justice’ (Marxism).
Before rising to a level of prime political influence, during his formative years, in 1971, Khaled Mashal joined the Muslim Brotherhood. The Muslim Brotherhood has documented connections to Jesuit-controlled freemasonry. An article entitled Muslims and Masons, authored by Phillip Jenkins, confirms this connection. During the nineteenth century, Jenkins points out that the development of modern Islamist thought, and the growing influence of the Muslim Brotherhood used freemasonry, particularly French freemason lodges in Egypt, as a vehicle for spiritual reform.
SEE: https://www.patheos.com/blogs/anxiousbench/2014/06/masons-and-muslims/
Hamas’s connection to Marxism-Leninism, as well as the Muslim Brotherhood’s link to freemasonry, speaks volumes as to exactly who – the Jesuit’s Society of Jesus, in control of both Hollywood’s military/industrial/entertainment complex, CIA, Mossad – was dangling the strings of the political strawman puppet and media-generated fabrication known as “Khaled Mashal”. Indeed, further investigation reveals that this alleged former leader of Hamas is not who he appears to be.
While carefully analyzing the content of the video excerpt posted immediately above, dramatic images, presumably meant to depict the war-torn region of Gaza, are projected upon green screens positioned directly behind the on-air talent. Watching more closely, everyone will begin to notice that, during certain frames, the image of alleged Hamas leader “Khaled Mashal” begins to glitch and that Mashal’s audio falls out of sync. This is most likely caused by technical difficulties with Face 2 Face Real-Time Face Capture and Reenactment software. Closer examination of Mashal’s still images reveals that his facial geometry and certain portions of his ears have been modified to not only frustrate image comparison, facial recognition, and ear biometric analysis, but to better hide the presence of a Hollywood live-action role player, one who, on several occasions, has been identified as a serial perpetrator of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.
Facial recognition, ear biometric, and image comparison analysis confirm that “Khaled Mashal”, alleged by the MSM to be the former leader of Mossad-created Palestinian “terrorist” organization Hamas, is a media-generated fabricated character scheme portrayed by Hollywood actor George Clooney.
