Corruption Allegations Unmask Royal Princess

Those belonging to the monopoly criminal cartel of the thirteen ruling elite Jesuit families just can’t help but leave glaring clues of their malfeasances at the scene of the crime.

One often wonders, could this be due to sheer arrogance, an overwhelming sense of infallibility, perhaps even inscrutability?

Or do they grossly underestimate the perceptive abilities of the general public?

Either way, on this occasion, the perpetrator has been well caught.

Though the true identity of former New South Wales Premiere “Gladys Berejiklian” was most likely thought to be well-hidden, under further scrutiny, a glaring similarity – in the form of a conspicuous epidermal landmark – between the fabricated character scheme and the live-action role player was discovered. Regarding the pair of images posted immediately below, everyone will notice they have both been subjected to degrees of photo shop, particularly in the case of the image to everyone’s left which features the former Premiere of New South Wales, “Gladys Berejiklian”.

The former Premiere of New South Wales – “Gladys Berejiklian” – recently resigned her post due to charges of alleged corruption.

Be that as it may, the former Premiere’s live-action role player is now most likely comfortably ensconced in her royal castle, remaining comfortably insulated from further scrutiny. Alas, under prevailing Admiralty Law, a fabricated character scheme acting under the cover of a pseudonym – someone who doesn’t legally exist as a corporation or person – cannot be held legally accountable for any alleged criminalities. 

But there is one more thing of which everyone can be certain.

Though, in future, the fabricated character scheme known to the public as “Gladys Berejiklian” may indeed be brought forth to dutifully play her role in a formally executed legal hearing – merely some well-scripted piece of staged masonic theater – the live-action role player identified in portrayal of the former Premiere of New South Wales – a British royal and daughter of Queen Elizabeth II and the late Prince Phillip Mountbatten – has remained inconspicuous from the public’s view.

That is, until now.

AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY

The capital of Australia is Canberra, in New South Wales which, according to Wikipedia, is a “landlocked federal territory of Australia containing the national capital Canberra and some surrounding townships. It is located in southeastern Australian mainland as an enclave completely within the state of New South Wales.” 

In 1911, Australia was legally transferred to the Commonwealth and governed by a Constitutional monarchy under the rule of the royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (AKA Windsor/Hanover/Rothschild/Rockefeller) which is now presided over by the reigning sovereign monarch, Queen Elizabeth II. 

Given these facts, is it any surprise a member of the British royal family would be installed under a pseudonym as a political proxy in New South Wales to represent the Queen’s interests and those of her royal family? 

Overall, Canberra is Australia’s eighth largest city and is also, according to Wikipedia, a “planned” city with some familiar architectural landmarks. In the images posted immediately below, everyone will surely begin to notice Canberra’s architectural familiarities consist of a domed structure, a reflecting pool, and a phallic obelisk, symbolic architectural features which are also common to Vatican City, to Washington’s District of Columbia, and to the City of London’s Crown Temple (one-square mile). 

These sorts of architectural structures are symbolic of the global governing sovereignty of the thirteen Jesuit families and of their globally monopolistic criminal commercial cartels. Through the language of occult symbolism, these architectural structures are speaking in the sounds of silence to all and sundry that the rule of Rome – while hidden behind slews of NGO’s (“non-profit” non-government organizations), the UN (United Nations/AKA the Holy Roman Empire), the World Economic Forum, Vatican City (controlled by the Jesuit military order or the Society of Jesus), and the Holy See in Switzerland (SNB/AKA Swiss National Bank) – still reigns supreme over Australia, over New South Wales, and over the entire world.

This reality of Rome’s occult rule is hidden in legalese – as opposed to vernacular – which, also according to Wikipedia, describes New South Wales as “Australian Capital Territory”, an “enclave” within the state.

POLITICAL CAREER OF “GLADYS BEREJIKLIAN

Wikipedia informs us that “Gladys Berejiklian”, “born 22 September 1970″, is an Australian politician who served as the 45th Premiere of New South Wales and the leader of the New South Wales Liberal Party.” While she assumed the office of New South Wales’s Premiere on “23 January 2017,” Wikipedia also informs “Gladys Berejiklian” had been, “a member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly since 2003…”

Is there anyone who noticed anything suspicious about the dates included in Wikipedia’s official entry for “Gladys Berejiklian”?

Certainly, those whom frequent this site noticed more than one numerological marker.

When the numerals included in the date of “22 September 1970” are added together – 22+9+19+7 –  they sum to 57/5+7=12. As everyone is also quite well-aware, when subjected to the law of occult mirrored reversal – the occult concept symbolically represented by the reflecting pool observed among the images of Canberra in New South Wales posted immediately above – the number of 12 equals 21 or 3 7’s which, in turn, sum to 777, Alistair Crowley’s joker intelligence code.

SEE: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/777_and_Other_Qabalistic_Writings_of_Aleister_Crowley

But that’s not all.

When the second date – “23 January 2017” –  listed in the preceding Wikipedia excerpt is added to the year – “2003” – “Gladys Berejiklian” entered New South Wales’s Legislative Assembly – 24+19+5- we are left with a sum of 48 (4+8=12/21/777).

Added to this, Wikipedia lists the official birth date of “Gladys Berejiklian” as 1970 (19+7=26/2 6’s or 12/21/777).

Turns out, as well, the number of 70 is equivalent to the age of the royal princess who has been identified as the host actor (live-action role player) behind the mask of the politician known to the public as the former Premiere of New South Wales, the disgraced “Gladys Berekjiklian”. 

In essence, having encoded Alistair Crowley’s 777 into an officially published biographical entry, the Jesuit-trained desk jockeys at Langley’s CIA are covertly signaling to the public that “Gladys Berejiklian” existed only as a well-crafted media persona, one which was contrived into a fabricated character scheme and portrayed by a live-action role player, a deliberate perpetrator of the phenomenon of Post-Modern Reality Simulation. 

IDENTICAL EPIDERMAL LANDMARK

Below, from L to R, Gladys Berejiklian, Anne, Princess Royal

While carefully scrutinizing the succession of images posted above, everyone will begin to notice there exists an identical facial landmark in common between the fabricated character scheme known as “Gladys Berejiklian” and her host actor (live-action role player) Princess Anne of the royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (AKA Windsor/Hanover/Rothschild/Rockefeller).

While directing  attentions towards the facial geometric regions located near the right eyes belonging to both “Gladys Berejiklian” and her host actor, Anne, Princess Royal, everyone will begin to notice – as was discovered to be the case between US congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and the British royal identified as her host actor, Meghan, Duchess of Sussex – there exists a distinctive, conspicuous, and identically located birthmark in common between them.

Although the epidermal contours along the bridge of the nose belonging to the fabricated character scheme known as “Gladys Berejiklian” has been strategically distorted and donned with latex stippling and her host actor – Anne, Princess Royal – has been outfitted with disguising contact lenses, facial recognition and image comparison analyses confirm the architectural and epidermal structures, dimensions of the chins, lips, and earlobes are identical.

KNIGHT OF THE GARTER & ROYAL ORDER OF THE THISTLE

A former Olympic equestrian, Anne, Princess Royal also happens to be one of the most highly decorated among the British royal family. She has also been highly regarded by the BBC (AKA MI7) as one of the hardest working royals on behalf of the interests of the British royal family. As for Princess Anne’s royal decorations, she is numbered among the Knights of the Order of the Garter, an ancient military-styled order of chivalry founded by Edward III of England in 1348. According to Wikipedia, “It {Knight of the Garter} is the most senior order of knighthood in the British honorary system, outranked in precedence only by the Victoria Cross and the George Cross.

In addition to having been knighted into the Royal Victorian Order – a dynastic order of knighthood established by Queen Victoria in 1896 – Anne, Princess Royal has also been initiated into the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order of the Thistle which, again, according to Wikipedia, “is an order of chivalry associated with Scotland” and founded by King James VII of Scotland (AKA James II of England and Ireland).

The thistle, according to sacred-texts.com, is a phallic symbol comparative to the occult symbolism represented by the obelisks located at the Vatican in Rome, in Washington D.C., and in the City of London’s Crown Temple. As everyone observed among the preceding image(s) posted at an earlier juncture in this article, an obelisk-like structure has also been built in Canberra, New South Wales, the capital of Australia.

SEE: https://www.sacred-texts.com/eso/sta/sta22.htm 

As the second child and highly decorated only royal daughter of Queen Elizabeth and the late Prince Phillip Mountbatten, Duke of Edinburgh, is there anyone who still suspects it was due to mere coincidence that Anne, Princess royal of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, would be entrusted to execute the genocidal sustainability goals of the UN’s Agenda 2030 on behalf of her mother Queen Elizabeth II while posing under the cover of a political pseudonym – “Gladys Berejiklian” – attached to a  media-driven fabricated character scheme? 

Indeed, certainly not.