Within an investigative context, minute details are akin to clues hidden along jungled pathways culminating into ultimate revelation.
After studying the performance of the actor featured in the following video excerpt – alleged to be “Phillip Mudd”, American media commentator and former counterterrorism official at both CIA and FBI – everyone will begin to surely notice similarities, in both tone and nuance(s) of voice as well as physical mannerisms, in common with a Hollywood/television actor who rose to stardom during the era of the 1980’s, one who is perhaps most famous for having been cast in the lead role of the Hollywood science fiction blockbuster ‘Back to the Future’.
During his interview with CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, “Mudd” – a surname which, gematria calculation informs, equals 21, 3 7’s, or 777 in English Ordinal Reverse Reduction, Alistair Crowley’s joker intelligence code – attempts to elaborately spin a ridiculous yarn concerning a car bombing which was alleged to have been carried out by a terrorist, a terrorist he claims to have later spoken with. This narrative represents a gross prevarication undoubtedly created by CIA’s intelligence handlers then delivered by “Mudd” while on air with a theatrical flourish of intense but feigned emotional hysteria. Furthermore, this dubious tale detailing an act of alleged “terrorism” was likely thoroughly concocted to not only bolster in the minds of the targeted audience demographics the utility and continued necessity for CIA and FBI’s domestic and global surveillance efforts to combat “terrorism” and to keep the general public “safe” from “terrorists”, but to justify further tax expenditures beneficial to annual budgetary expansions. Upon viewing the video posted immediately above several more times, it also becomes apparent through detailed ocular analysis that certain portions of the facial geometry belonging to “Phil Mudd” have been strategically modified with CGI layering/animation during CNN’s post-production phase.
What “Mudd” fails to reveal, however, is that the American general public are the genuine target of these alphabet lettered agency’s vast surveillance dragnet and are therefore regarded as potential “terrorists”.
As shall be further detailed later on, the confirmed identity of the Hollywood actor in portrayal of CIA/FBI counterterrorism official “Phillip Mudd” confirms several salient points.
One – that high profile Hollywood actors/celebrities are also well-trained intelligence assets and agents who are regularly contracted to perform under pseudonyms in the guise of high government officials to influence public opinion and perception and, through the effectiveness of their scripted public performances to elicit desired emotional responses in their targeted audiences, to justify greater tax expenditures allocated towards alphabet lettered US corporate government agencies acting under the aegis of and in concert with the Jesuit-controlled US military/industrial/Hollywood entertainment complex.
Two – in the case of former counterterrorism CIA/FBI official and MSM commentator “Phillip Mudd”, it becomes apparent his positive identification as a media-generated fabricated character scheme, portrayed by a strategically modified Hollywood actor, Michael J. Fox (666), legitimizes the premise that both CIA and FBI have historically utilized such modified character schemes for the purposes of plausible deniability regarding their various taxpayer funded psychological operations and, three, by virtue of placing such modified characters acting under pseudonyms who cannot be legally prosecuted in any court operating under Admiralty (AKA Roman/Maritime) Law before the public’s eye as “official” spokespersons, they are provided with an impenetrable shield against the possibility of legal scrutiny or worse, criminal prosecution.
But, given that “Alejandro Mayorkas”, the current chief of US Homeland Security, has also been identified as a fabricated character scheme, portrayed by another famous Hollywood actor – more on this will be revealed in another article, coming soon – there arrives an additional, and perhaps even more sinister, hypothetical premise to consider.
Namely, that the office of Homeland Security exists merely as a brass plated front or proxy for Jesuit-controlled CIA, created as a US corporate government funded bank depository from which CIA can clandestinely but legally funnel, in the way of double dipping, more tax dollars into its already bulging coffers both to sufficiently fund and to dramatically expand its domestic and globally connected surveillance and psychological operations.