Certain individuals have a knack for remaining clandestine while simultaneously keeping a somewhat conspicuous public profile. A paradoxical scenario to be sure. To those among the general public, however, someone with the capability to execute such a deceptive trick would be considered tantamount to a magician. And yet again, such a feat may not too difficult for one in possession of great wealth, wealthy enough to gain some modicum of influential or even controlling interest in the MSM.

In addition, when one’s son is the ubiquitous cult of personality known as “Elon Musk”, chief executive of both Tesla, Space X and chief proprietor of X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter, it may be that much easier, after faking one’s death, for a “dead” man to conceal one’s genuine identity with an appropriated pseudonym attached to an alternate persona. If successful at employing such deceptive tactics, one could conceivably hide among the public arena while operating in plain view.

16593837805180

But why make the hypothesis that the man pictured in the image posted above may be “dead”?

Because it turns out that, upon more extensive investigation, “Errol Musk”, alleged to be the father of “Elon Musk” (AKA Prince Constantijn of the Netherlands) is a British royal in disguise, one who was recently alleged to have “died”. Though there isn’t much biographical information available on “Errol”, enough information remains extant to provide possible clues as to his true identity.

1.) Online biographies reveal that Errol’s mother was British, 2.) There exists a rather well-circulated, but dubious MSM promoted narrative which appears derived from a discarded B grade Hollywood action/thriller script treatment, the reported details of which allege “Errol Musk” fended off an attack from a gang of gun toting home invaders at his plush residence in South Africa.

Suspiciously, this particular widely circulated story is not only ridden with gematria coding, but the veracity of its narrative details – like most if not all such stories promoted by the MSM – crumble to utter dust under the weight of even the slightest scrutiny.

For example, despite being outnumbered and outgunned, this MSM promoted story claims that not only did “Errol” heroically emerge intact and alive, but he managed to gun down three of the seven alleged home invaders.

CROWN ROYALS IN DISGUISE

On many occasions, it has been discovered that several European royals have a penchant for assuming alternative identities, posing as major public figures, whether it be in the Hollywood movie/music/television entertainment industry, high-level politics, the legal profession, or other fields of human endeavor. In the larger sense of describing this phenomenon, many of these are what has been termed on this site as repeat perpetrators of Post-Modern Reality Simulation. This is an idea – facilitated by a post-modern moral relativity or even bankruptcy – which proposes the public’s perception of reality is routinely manipulated then tailored to suit the particular commercial or political interests of thirteen royal families. These families whom genealogically descend from imperial bloodlines of the ancient Roman Empire – Orsini, Aldobrandini, Somaglia, Farnese, Borgia, Breakspear, Medici – have not only sworn eternal fealty to the pontiff in Vatican City (AKA Holy See/Swiss banking consortium) controlled by the Superior General of the Jesuit’s Society of Jesus, but despite what the history books may claim, are still ruling over a triune system of global governance maintained by Admiralty Law (AKA Roman Law), including the City of London’s Crown Temple, its four courts, and Washington D.C. (AKA United States/Virginia Company) which serves as its military enforcer.

The particular “late” British royal implicated in this case – identified as starring in the role of “Errol Musk” – has proved worthy of this ignoble classification. The man alleged to be his son is also an actor, an intelligence trained asset designed to influence public opinion and perceptions regarding the increasingly intimate relationship between digital technologies, specifically artificial intelligence in the form of a cerebrally implanted chip, and the future of humanity.

In a previously published article – Canadian Convoy Smells Like Royal Musk – “Elon Musk”, Space X and Tesla chief executive, was identified as a fabricated character scheme portrayed by Prince Constantijn of the Netherlands.

Below: Elon Musk, Prince Constantijn of the Netherlands

elon-musk-smiling-wide

1337571

Elon-Musk-6

a5edf243a32b97c1f76620754380bf23--dutch-queen-the-younger

Turns out that, too, another son of “Errol Musk”, “Kimbal”, is also a fabricated character scheme portrayed by a Hollywood actor, a rather renowned and famous actor who, upon more extensive investigation, also has a hidden royal identity.

RICH PLAYBOY

Official biographical accounts and recorded public testimonies of “Elon Musk” indicate his father “Errol” has a checkered past, that for most of his rather cinematically adventurous life, he’s been what could be characterized as a rich playboy, reputed to have indulged in what could also be described as morally questionable if not borderline criminal behavior. Though some of these biographies also claim “Errol” is a well-educated man, alas, they don’t reveal exactly where he was educated, or at which institutions of higher learning. One supposes, those responsible for fabricating the details of his official biographies presumed that everyone would, while overlooking such lack of specificity, simply suppose that “Errol Musk” is somewhat of a self-made man, one who has lived his life with the expectation of winning at roulette through sheer luck.

While examining Errol’s biographies, it appears much ado has been made concerning the personal friction between “Errol” and “Elon Musk”.

According to an article published at news.com.au, “Elon has referred to him {Errol} as a ‘terrible human being’, adding: ‘Almost every evil thing you could think of, he has done’.”

In fact, several MSM sources claim that, since the late 1990’s, both Errol’s sons, Elon and Kimbal, agreed to financially support their father, on the strict grounds that he behaved himself. Apparently, for the most part, MSM sources further claim, “Errol” hasn’t lived up to his end of the bargain.

Deeper analysis may reveal that this disreputable biographical portrait may actually have merit and may in fact emanate from what amounts to a shocking glimpse into the genuine psychological profile of the “late” royal host actor (live-action role player) cast in the role of “Errol Musk”.

Official biographies inform that “Errol Graham Musk” was born in 1946, in Pretoria, Transvaal, South Africa. That name existed as yet another clue as to the actor’s genuine identity. Turns out, Errol’s middle name – “Graham” – is derived from another famous fabricated character modification into which his royal live-action role player was formerly cast.

SEE: Hollywood Billy Graham’s Royal Smoking Gun

What is truly contradictory, while the world-renowned evangelist “Billy Graham” posed himself as a “man of God”, “Errol Musk”, though some official biographies claim he was a Christian, appears to have dedicated a majority of his life to the pursuit of iniquitous desires. Then again, while leading double lives, such contradictions manifest from a dualistic philosophy consistent with high-degree freemasonry.

Before gaining a reputation as an amoral sexual philanderer with a penchant for pursuing all manner of iniquities, “Errol Musk” was alleged to have worked as a pilot, an electromechanical engineer, property developer, sailor, and ‘consultant’.

As alluded to earlier, several online biographical accounts confirm, Errol’s father – Henry James Musk – was South African, and his mother – Cora Amelia Robinson – was British. They also inform that after accumulating significant wealth as an engineering consultant, real estate developer, and owner of mines and natural resources infrastructure as a young man, “Errol” married his “high school sweetheart”, Maye Haldeman, a Canadian model and dietician, in 1970. But after the marriage produced three children, at the end of the decade, in 1979, they were amicably divorced.

In addition to owning mines, a yacht, and a Cessna aircraft, several websites claim “Errol” also collects thoroughbred racehorses. One of the larger mining establishments “Errol” was alleged to have owned was an emerald mine near Lake Tanganyika, Zambia, a claim which has been steadfastly refuted by “Elon Musk”.

Such contradictions, controversy, appear to haunt Errol’s life story. Nevertheless, those elements have only served to enhance the frequency of mystery and intrigue swirling around the man known as “Errol Musk”.

“He {Errol} didn’t own an emerald mine,” Elon said in answer to the claim on Twitter, dated December 29, 2019. “I worked my way through college, ending up – $100K in student debt,” Elon went on to amplify. “I couldn’t even afford a second PC at Zip 2, so I programmed at night & website only worked during day. Where is this bs coming from?”

After divorcing his “high school sweetheart”, “Errol” married Heidi-Marie, a widower. As a man reportedly at the mercy of sensual temptations, during a marriage which lasted eighteen years, and after having two daughters with Heidi-Marie, “Errol” saw fit to shack up with his stepdaughter, Jana Bezuidenhout, an illicit imbroglio which snowballed with passionate intensity and, according to newsunzip.com, yielded Errol’s sixth child out of wedlock. Everyone surely took note of the gematria coded into the article’s information published at newsunzip.com: 18 years of marriage (3 6’s/666)/6th child (3+3/33/highest degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry).

During the divorce proceedings, “Errol” reportedly revealed that, added to his relationship with Jana Bezuidenhout, he had carried on numerous adulterous affairs.

CLINT EASTWOOD STYLE

“Elon Musk’s scandal-ridden dad Errol has told how he killed three armed intruders Clint Eastwood-style in South Africa – while his young daughter clung to his leg,” crows an article published back in 2022 at news.com.au.

As alluded to earlier, the tale of Errol’s gun-toting heroism alleged to have been performed in 1998 at his upmarket property in Sandton, Johannesburg appears all-too-similar to the ridiculous “hammer attack” incident involving the spouse of former US House speaker “Nancy Pelosi” (AKA Jane Fonda/Dolly Parton/Dawn Hochsprung/Mary Sherlach/Princess Lee Bouvier Radziwill), “Paul Pelosi” (AKA Hollywood film director Roger Vadim).

SEE: Pelosi Case Hammered Wide Open

Nancy Pelosi Gets Nailed Once Again

According to news.com.au, on a late afternoon sometime in 1998, Musk arrived with his six-year-old daughter, Ali, to check on his vacant rental property in Johannesburg, which, at the time, it is claimed, was being repainted for an incoming tenant.

“At 5pm local time, news.com.au reports, “Ali wanted to take a bath in the main bedroom…”

Right away, we can observe the first instance of coding in this particular story.

The number 5 is synonymous with the pentagram, an occult magical talisman.

When Errol searched for a towel, it was then, he was confronted “by a gang of seven men in the lounge area.” The gang opened fire, Musk claims, nevertheless, Errol withstood the attack unharmed and survived the vicious onslaught of bullets. Musk then fled upstairs to a bedroom to retrieve a loaded 357-magnum placed upon a shelf top where his daughter couldn’t get at it.

“I killed three, one bullet went through two of them,” Musk claims.

Certainly, everyone detected Alistair Crowley’s Kabbalah inspired 777-code (seven men/killed three=3 7’s/777) embedded in Musk’s fake news story. The reference to Hollywood actor Clint Eastwood made by news.com.au is also a dead giveaway that this story involving “Errol Musk” is an MSM-concocted hoax. Of course, this isn’t surprising, because, as everyone may recall from the article concerning American televangelist “Billy Graham”, the royal host actor identified in portrayal of “Errol Musk” was also identified as Hollywood/television actor James Arness, cast as the gun toting avenging town sheriff in western styled television series Gunsmoke.

By the time Musk reappeared in the lounge area to return fire, so the story goes, most of the intruders had absconded, save one. What news.com.au claims happened next is truly nothing short of fantastical. In a one-on-one standoff reminiscent of such confrontations seen in classic Hollywood westerns, Musk felled the remaining intruder with a second shot into the victim’s groin. For some reason, these sort of MSM-derived stories almost always seem to enjoy dropping in references to genitalia.

Apparently, before being felled by Musk’s uncanny marksmanship, the remaining intruder was armed with a 9mm pistol from which he managed to fire off a shot at close range, miraculously missing Musk and embedding into the middle of a half-opened vinyl paneled door.

Keep in mind, during this entire fantastical scenario, news.com.au also claims his daughter, Ali, was clinging for dear life to her father’s leg while, like Clint Eastwood’s Dirty Harry, “Errol” proceeded to mow down the invading villains with just two shots from an expertly wielded magnum pistol.

Perhaps just as suspiciously, the news article published at news.com.au doesn’t mention anything about a subsequent police investigation, nor does it bother to verify any of the names of the alleged intruders in connection with Musk’s wild home invasion incident.

Just why would that be so?

Because, evidenced by the following statement from “Errol Musk” as reported by news.com.au, the entire ridiculously detailed incident was fabricated as distractive clickbait and as a promotional media vehicle.

“Asked if he is some Clint Eastwood, he {Musk} replied, “Well, you can say so. Yeah, why not?”

ERROL & A ‘DEAD’ PRINCE CONSORT

All of the aforementioned biographical information concerning Musk notwithstanding, some of the other details of Errol’s biographies – his ownership of yachts, mines, natural resource infrastructures, for example – invite a single pertinent question. Who else would harbor an interest in sailing, yachts, thoroughbred horses, and aircraft?

Someone among the British royal family, for instance?

The “late” Prince Phillip served as an officer in the British royal navy during WWII. Added to that, a documentary on the British royal family which briefly aired on the BBC before being banned reportedly due to the fact the royal family disapproved of the production, revealed that the “late” Prince Phillip – like “Errol Musk” – was an active and licensed pilot, one that, up to that period of time, had flown over forty-seven types of aircraft, logging over two-hundred hours of flight time per year. But the biographical commonalities between “Errol Musk” and the “late” British prince consort don’t end there. Turns out, for most of his life, the former Duke of Edinburgh was also an avid horse racing enthusiast. According to an article published by the LA Times in 2021, Phillip was the “longest serving president of the international {equestrian} federation.”

SEE: https://latimes.com/sports/newsletter/2021-04-10/remembering-prince-phillip-horse-racing

Obviously, some biographical details related to the “late” Prince Phillip (AKA Billy Graham/James Arness/Dick Van Dyke) have been recycled for the fabricated character scheme known as “Errol Musk”.

Extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analysis confirm that though most images of “Errol Musk” are modified with photo shop manipulation, not only is it possible to detect the “late” Prince Phillip and “Errol Musk” have facial landmarks in common, but teeth analysis also demonstrates similar if not identical alignments, shapes, and contours.

Below: Errol Musk, Prince Phillip

errol-musk-800x425

Prince-Philip-Duke-Edinburgh

errol-musk-800x425

Screenshot (53)

errol-musk-2

Prince-Philip-Duke-Edinburgh-age-health-healthy-716673

16593837805180

Prince-Philip (1)

errol-musk_7776

Img349789112

It was hypothesized earlier in this article that Prince Phillip’s penchant for modifying himself into various high-profile fabricated character schemes most likely conceptually derives from the idea of duality, an idea synonymous with the occult tenets of high-degree freemasonry. Therefore, it is no surprise to learn that on the eve of his marriage to the future Queen Elizabeth II (AKA Lucille Ball/Jean Hill/Dame Rebecca West/Hollywood actress Ruth Gordon), Prince Phillip was initiated into the Order of the Garter which, according to esotericfreemasons.com, “is one of the oldest and most exclusive Freemasonry orders in England.”

Though Wikipedia admits this, as if it were an insignificant afterthought in a paragraph placed near the bottom of the biographical page entry for the former Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Phillip, an earlier more prominently displayed statement makes this dubious claim regarding Phillip’s participation in Freemasonry: “According to one journalist writing in 1983, Phillip’s mother-in-law and his uncle Lord Mountbatten had unfavorable views of Freemasonry; after his initiation, Phillip took no further part in the organization.”

KING KIMBAL CRUISE?

The genuine identity of “Kimbal Musk” goes even further to demonstrate that the “Musk” family is an MSM-generated fabrication, designed by the Jesuit military-styled intelligence apparatus as a mass behavioral/social engineering scheme.

351ef6c6d9ad30026151f545a0d6eb75

Kimbal20Musk

In fact, deeper analysis indicates the advancement of the sort of technological industries with which both “Elon” and his brother “Kimbal” are involved seem to be designed to more rapidly facilitate the global implementation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen “sustainability” goals.

While “Elon Musk” is focused on scaling up his digital brain-link to facilitate the implementation of the “Internet of Things”, an attempt to centrally control all human resources with artificial intelligence, his brother “Kimbal”, according to an article published at futurism.com, “has a Silicon Valley plan to feed America.”

“Kimbal Musk” is aligned with several non-profit organizations – “Kitchen Community”, “Square Roots Project” – dedicated to revolutionizing the concept of farming and the production of food. While perusing the details of the article published at futurism.com, it doesn’t take long to deduce that the non-profits Musk is shilling for are related not only to promoting implementation of “smart” cities and the UN’s sustainability goals but applying digital technology to food production to fit within the UN’s global “smart” city model. The former non-profit organization affiliated with “Kimbal Musk” – Kitchen Community – has implemented a plan installing “learning gardens” in Memphis, Tennessee area public schools to teach students about “vertical farming”. The latter, “Square Roots Project” – note, the term ‘square’ as it relates to freemasonry: ‘squaring the circle’, black and white masonic lodge tracing board symbolic of duality – is a program designed, according to futurism.com, to “train young farmers to grow greens for sale with nothing but LED’s and enhanced water in Brooklyn {New York City} shipping containers.”

LED’s – enhanced water systems?

Detailed information contained in an article published at https://www.idesuk.com/lighting-internet-things/, explains how LED lighting is directly related to facilitating the Internet of Things, a blockchain digital grid system designed to centrally connect and control smart cities and inhabiting human resources with artificial intelligence. It follows then that the term ‘enhanced water systems’ likely implies that the water supplies connected to UN “smart” cities will contain carcinogenic graphene-oxide chemical compounds and nanoparticles, facilitating – with the help of digital “smart” meters – the tracking, tracing, and ultimate control over human resource water usage.

But in addition to these deceptions, extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analysis demonstrate “Kimbal Musk” is not who he claims to be. Like his father “Errol” and brother “Elon”, “Kimbal” is a media-generated fabricated character scheme – a modified Hollywood actor in disguise.

Below: Kimbal Musk, Tom Cruise

Additional analysis indicates, the facial geometry of the Hollywood live-action role player – “Tom Cruise” – identified in the portrayal of the fabricated character scheme known as “Kimbal Musk” has been strategically and skillfully modified with silicone-based stippling and prosthetics, which is why, for most of his career, he has never appeared to significantly age. This sophisticated modification process has also well-hidden the British royal who has portrayed, in addition to “Kimbal Musk” (AKA Tom Cruise), a virtual array of legendary Hollywood personas – Al Pacino/Keith Richards/Bruce Springsteen/Cat Stevens/Christian Bale – renowned in both the Jesuit-controlled movie and music industries, and even, in the case of the “late” iconic anchorman Ted Koppel, the MSM

It should also not be forgotten – as observed in the video excerpt posted immediately above – that “Tom Cruise” played the role of a “doctor” who, over one decade ago, performed during a press conference subsequent to the Aurora, Colorado movie theater shooting hoax.

SEE: Charles and Ted’s Not So Excellent Adventure

Extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analysis confirm that Prince Charles – now King Charles III – is the host actor in common with all of the aforementioned fabricated character schemes.

Below: Tom Cruise, Prince Charles

Below: Prince Charles, Tom Cruise, Kimbal Musk

8 thoughts on “Errol Musk: ‘Dead’ Man Resurrected?

  1. Another anomaly that comes to mind is Elon Musk’s recounting of his early years. I find it laughable that despite coming from a wealthy background, he couldn’t even afford a second computer, not to mention his student loans, while in college/university – and the computer he did use was semi-functional at best. It reads like another shallow, cliche sob story that’s the usual drivel spewed by fakes like Musk, which is done, of course, to garner the sympathy of the gullible peasants. That, or his rich father simply refused to help out Elon out of animosity for him, though that still wouldn’t have stopped him from receiving financial support from his rich friends or family members besides his father.

    1. Shallow indeed when one understands the methods of operation meticulously applied and utilized to manipulate targeted audiences. “Elon Musk” was fabricated as a media image, a cult of personality for the purpose of executing a sophisticated social engineering/behavioral modification program tailored with specific messaging designed to psychologically influence certain targeted audience demographics. Unfortunately, from the looks of things, this CIA/intelligence directed programming has been widely successful.

  2. Thank you for another fascinating read. It’s funny how homely I’ve always found Charles and how gorgeous Tom Cruise always was. Yet I can see the same face behind the hair and the varied facial expression now that you show them side by side.

Leave a Reply