Former Fox News Star’s Hanky Panky

What follows are the results of a reinvestigation into a major MSM figure. Although identified as a yet another fabricated media-generated image, recently, upon further investigation, it was discovered the portraying live-action role player had been misidentified. Bill O’Reilly – the former host of gutter trash tabloid Inside Edition and perhaps the most odious, intemperate gas bagging buffoon the MSM has ever put before the public – was at one time hailed as Fox News’s most popular news commentator.

Below: Bill O’Reilly

It turns out that the loud-mouthed and ill-tempered purveyor of propagandistic raw sewage known as “Bill O’Reilly” is merely yet another in an array of high-profile character modifications portrayed by one of Hollywood’s most iconic actors who, in turn, exists as a “reincarnation” of a “dead” Rockefeller, reportedly kidnapped and cannibalized back in the early 1960’s by a wild tribe of troglodytes while visiting an island in the Southwestern Pacific.

Or – so the “official” MSM created narrative would have the public believe.

SEE: Dead Rockefeller Resurrected Hollywood Star 

POLARIZING BLOVIATOR

After thoroughly reexamining the MSM news career of one “Bill O’Reilly”, it became evident that the development of his television persona was a calculated creation, a deliberate attempt to further degenerate the professional delivery of news and information commentary, shifting the focus away from appearances of competent, credible and objective analysis and pivoting downward towards emotionally driven partisan propaganda which exploited the psychologically conditioned biases of targeted audiences.

With the appearance of Bill O’Reilly dominating the prime-time television airwaves during the late 1990’s and into the early to mid-2000’s, network executives had signaled they preferred the audio-visual thrill of confrontational mayhem rather than orderly, civilized interactive proceedings, to airing news commentary comparable to the low brow quality of that which resembled the Jerry Springer Show in lieu of the sophistication and subtlety of Willliam F. Buckley’s Firing Line or even Meet the Press. O’Reilly’s abrasive and often confrontational style as a news commentator/television host was always rather predictable but on the other hand appeared adopted as a well-rehearsed affectation. Rather than choosing to politely cross examine a guest while hosting one of his shows or engaging in thought provoking, stimulating debate as Buckley would have done in the past, O’Reilly always appeared as a sharp clawed fang bearing rabid Rottweiler intent on first pummeling his guests into submission before finally devouring them.

But make no mistake.

The creation of “O’Reilly” served an ulterior agenda which was not immediately apparent to the general public, television viewing audiences, and voracious consumers of MSM news content, commentary.

O’Reilly’s bloviating bare knuckled tough guy swagger was a cleverly designed calculation to not only increase television ratings through pure sensationalism but to further polarize the political biases of television viewing audiences. Reexamination of O’Reilly’s ‘official’ biographies reveals that, from the very beginning of his career, he and the Hollywood actor cast in portrayal, both with common connections to Disney, were set up as useful tools acting at the behest of the Jesuit-controlled U.S. military/industrial and Hollywood entertainment complexes.

WCVB-TV & EARLY YEARS

Sure enough, a clue revealed itself early on during the course of one’s reinvestigation into former Fox News star “Bill O’Reilly”, helping connect him to the living Hollywood template from which he was further modified. O’Reilly was born in Fort Lee, New Jersey, alleged to be the site of an American Revolutionary War encampment. Despite what successive generations have been taught about the American colonial Revolution, according to the terms and conditions of 1783’s Treaty of Paris, both negotiating sides were represented by attorney’s sworn in oath to the Crown Temple in the City of London, and King George III of the royal House of Hanover (aka Saxe-Coburg-Gotha/Windsor/Rockefeller/Rothschild) retained allodial title of the colonist’s land held in trust on behalf of the Crown corporation. Later, in 1791, with George Washington’s Proclamation of Federal Districts, the colonies (Crown Estates) were transformed into banking districts owned and controlled by City of London’s Crown Corporation with each district populated by a court to protect and ensure the bank’s corporate integrity. 

Therefore, to this day, the United States still remains a districted subsidiary of the City of London’s Crown corporation, operating under the umbrella of the Vatican’s Swiss banking consortium, and despite the alleged heroics of General Washington and his rag tag band of colonial troops, the human resource population is still encamped in a slave gulag enchained to the grotesque financial debt racked up by the United States (aka Washington D.C./Virginia Company) and owed to the Federal Reserve, a private banking subsidiary of City of London’s Crown Temple, Vatican Swiss banking consortium.

SEE: How Crown Temple Rules America (part I)

How Crown Temple rules America (part II)

How Crown Temple rules America (part III)

How Crown Temple Rules America (Part IV)

So much for talk of liberty, freedom, and justice for all, huh?

But there also exists another historically notable anecdote concerning Fort Lee. According to various sources, including Wikipedia, during the turn of the twentieth century, Fort Lee became America’s film capital before Hollywood, California gained that title later on.

SEE: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Films_shot-in-Fort_Fort_Lee_New_Jersey

During the latter stages of the 19th century, American inventor Thomas Edison had a film studio in Fort Lee, called ‘Black Maria’. Turns out, Fort Lee was also the film set location for the shooting of ‘Big’, which included the host actor (live-action role player) identified in portrayal of “Bill O’Reilly” among its cast. The movie was distributed by Twentieth Century Fox, owned by The Walt Disney Company. O’Reilly would go on to work for both CBS and ABC television networks, the latter of which is owned by parent company Disney General Entertainment Content. For his work at ABC between 1986-1989, O’Reilly was bestowed with a pair of Emmy and National Headliner Awards for excellence in reporting, which indicates just how far into the nether regions of the septic tank professional mainstream journalism had sunk by then. Before that time, aspects of O’Reilly’s nascent career in the television news industry during the late 1970’s, early 80’s when he was employed by several local news stations – including WCVB-TV located in Boston at News Center 5 – appears unremarkable, save for a few interesting and relevant biographical details.

WCVB-TV, where O’Reilly was employed during the mid-1980’s as a reporter and a columnist-at-large, had been involved in a legal dispute over its call sign and broadcast licensing. In 1972, a local group known as Boston Broadcasters, led by Leo Baranek, a noted acoustical scientist, expert and MIT professor, won a court decision on behalf of the fledgling station to earn the legal right to provide a greater share of local oriented programming to one of the largest television/radio broadcast markets in America. Harvard educated Baranek co-founded Bolt, Baranek, and Newman, an American research and development company headquartered in Cambridge, Massachusetts. Founded in 1948, the company became a wholly owned subsidiary of Raytheon, producers and manufacturers of the Patriot anti-missile system utilized in both Persian Gulf conflicts involving the U.S. military, wars for which the bombastic Bill O’Reilly served as an ardent and unapologetic MSM cheerleader. Baranek’s Harvard-connected scientific mentor, Frederick Vinton Hunt, was responsible for developing sonar for the purpose of military oriented applications. Baranek’s BBN received most of its funding from DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency), the creator of ARPANET (aka the internet) and due to this was able to make advances not only in the field of acoustics, but computer technologies, quantum information, and synthetic biology, the latter of which is closely tied to if not synonymous with the concept of transhumanism. 

SEE: https://www.synbiowatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Genewatch_Meiogenics.pdf     

HOAX HUCKSTER 

O’Reilly’s other claim to fame is as a New York Times best-selling author. The Times, of course, as has been pointed out in several previously published articles, is nothing more than a propaganda vehicle for the U.S. State Department, Jesuit-controlled U.S. military/industrial complex (Pentagon), CIA, FBI, Council on Foreign Relations and, more recently, vaccine peddling corporate pharmaceutical giants such as Pfizer and GlaxoSmithKline. With one mere glance at the titles and subject matter of O’Reilly’s co-authored tomes – Killing Kennedy, Killing Lincoln, Killing Reagan, etc. etc. – one can readily ascertain, presume that, while lending his name to such projects, O’Reilly may not only harbor an unhealthy death fixation, but that he is also nothing more than a two-bit huckster of historical hoax narratives. Each of O’Reilly’s books has been mass marketed, heavily promoted for the sole purpose of reinforcing fabricated hoaxes, historical myths, those which have also been assiduously pounded into the heads of successive generations of brainwashed American public-school students, college undergraduates.

But perhaps one shouldn’t be too hard on Mister Bill, because it is doubtful that he wrote one word appearing in the books which bear his name as an author. Rather, it appears likely that stamping O’Reilly’s name on the dust jacket was merely a calculated publicity stunt on the part of the publishing house, a method of exploitive marketing, promotion to brand a commercial product with a famous name to increase, maximize sales. Perhaps not so coincidentally, according to Wikipedia, the renowned Hollywood actor who has portrayed “O’Reilly” for years has also tried his hand at being a published writer with a collection of short stories and a novel published in 2023. Added to this, in 2017, O’Reilly’s name brand was lent out to promote the Marxist-derived socio-political agenda known as DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion).  

SEXUAL HARRASSMENT SNAFU

An article published at variety.com – SEE: https://variety.com/2017/tc/news/bill-oreilly-fired-sexual-harrassment-fox-news-timeline-1202372546 – details how a series of sexual harassment allegations published in the New York Times ended O’Reilly’s illustrious career at Fox News in April of 2017. First thing everyone will immediately notice is that the article published at variety.com detailing a “timeline” of O’Reilly’s professional demise is studded with several occult numerological markers, sending a clandestine message to those in the know that this story is a fabricated hoax, designed to satisfy an ulterior agenda. The article alleges, according to a piece published by NYT prior to April 1st, 2017, that O’Reilly and Fox’s parent company 21st Century Fox – latter acquired by Disney in 2019 – offered to pay out a sum totaling thirteen million dollars to five women armed with accusations of sexual impropriety to presumably stave off any further negative publicity and to prevent the allegations from being aired in open court. Right from the first paragraph, with Variety magazine using a CIA-controlled publication such as the New York Times lacking any and all credibility as its prime source and while also taking into consideration the obvious presence of numerological/occult markers, one can safely assume this story involving “O’Reilly” is yet another manufactured MSM hoax.  

1.) 13=unity among freemasons, thirteen ruling families, 2.) 5=pentagram (witchcraft/magical talisman), 3.) 13+5=18 (3 6’s/666). 

The timeline published by variety.com claims these allegations aimed at O’Reilly began on April 1st or 4/1, a date which when applied to the occult law of mirrored reversal also equals the number of 14, 2 7’s or 77 (Alistair Crowley’s Liber Al/Land of Oz).

14+2017(2+17=19) = 33, highest degree Scottish Rite freemasonry.  

Later in the article at variety.com, we are told that a feminist non-profit activist group called Ultraviolet turned up at Fox News to stage a protest, vehemently denouncing O’Reilly and the network for appearing to protect someone they perceived to be a sexual predator harmful to the safety of women in the corporate workplace. According to NYT via Variety, the five women were accusing O’Reilly of a “wide range of behaviors”, including “verbal abuse, lewd comments, unwanted advances and phone calls in which it sounded as if Mr. O’Reilly were masturbating.”

One supposes such sensational, though unsubstantiated, accusations make for great copy and greater circulation, especially when they are associated with a mainstream brand name like Bill O’Reilly. 

Further investigation into the Marxist/feminist Ultraviolet reveals the group had received millions of dollars in funding from Cultural Engagement Laboratory and its sister organization Center for Cultural Power which, in turn, are both funded by the Ford Foundation and George Soros’s Open Society. As previously reported, Ford Foundation is connected with Council on Foreign Relations and to the Foundations Platform f20, an umbrella organization covering a slew of other private foundations, including the private foundation of Prince Albert II of Monaco. Foundations Platform f20’s steering committee is dominated by none other than the Rockefeller Brothers Fund. As everyone will soon observe, these connections not only indicate probable collusion in fabricating a major media event, but it is also no coincidence that the money trail also leads straight towards the doorstep of the Rockefeller family.

Furthermore, according to an article published at influencewatch.org, both CEL and its sister organization are focused on issues involving immigration, climate change, gender, and abortion access issues, issues which, not surprisingly, are also integral to the seventeen “sustainability” goals of the UN’s genocidal Agenda 2030/2050. After the appearance of Ultraviolet at Fox News corporate headquarters, some of Fox’s key advertisers – Mitsubishi, Mercedes Benz, Hyundai – began to retract their supporting ad blocks slated for O’Reilly’s television time slots, citing support of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in the corporate workplace and in denunciation of O’Reilly’s alleged but legally unsubstantiated behaviors. Actually, the entire O’Reilly sexual harassment affair acted as an elaborate smokescreen for an ensuing and ongoing corporate/network consolidation shakeup, with Disney stepping in to take control of 21st Century Fox, Fox News’s parent company, a mere two years later.      

O’REILLY=HANKS/ROCKEFELLER

Comparative ear biometric and image comparison analysis between the following pair of images – one of which is claimed to have derived from O’Reilly’s high school yearbook – confirms that “Bill O’Reilly” is a media generated fabricated character scheme portrayed by Tom Hanks (aka Michael Rockefeller). The architectures, shapes, and contours of the respective ears proved to be a perfect match. Hanks (aka O’Reilly, Rockefeller) is a serial perpetrator of Post-Modern Reality Simulation, having portrayed a number of media-generated characters, including Hamish Harding (Titan submarine hoax) and former New Jersey governor Chris Christie. 

Below from L to R: Bill O’Reilly, Tom Hanks 

Below from L to R: Bill O’Reilly, Tom Hanks, Michael Rockefeller

Facial recognition analysis confirms that the epidermal architectures, shapes, and contours of the respective hairlines, eyes, brows, chins, noses, and jawlines are identical. 

Below: Tom Hanks, Bill O’Reilly

 

But that’s not all. Image comparison analysis also strongly indicates that the respective spouses of both Hanks and O’Reilly are one and the same. 

Below: Maureen McPhilmy, Rita Wilson