History’s story of “Honest Abe” fiction? (Part I)

This blog is fast becoming a historical killing field, filled with the slaughtered carcasses of American history’s sacred cows. And now, one shall usher perhaps the most sacred of them all into the paddock – Abraham Lincoln – the “Illinois rail-splitter”, masonic puppet, actor, and yes folks, a total fiction.

The official, mainstream history of America one encounters in public school and university texts is indeed a blatant fiction, designed to exalt the truthful virtues of dramatic accounts and mythical characters, all of which have been entirely fabricated to induce the masses’ psychological and emotional investment into believing – so it seems in the case of Abraham Lincoln – completely and utterly fictitious absurdities.

For the span of almost two centuries now, the mythical story of Abraham Lincoln has echoed down to the present time as an almost sacred, gospel-like tradition and, anyone daring to question its historical veracity has been summarily labeled a heretic or even worse, branded with the all-purpose, ad hominem pejorative: “conspiracy theorist.”

Thus, the unorthodox perspectives, opinions, and discussions discovered here at Newsspell must be considered quite heretical indeed. Surely, anyone thinking of  subscribing to such heretical musings deserves the most ghastly, painful persecution while tortuously hoisted upon burning stakes.

Well then, so be it.

By way of comparison, the comically anomalous nature of the alleged Lincoln assassination story makes the JFK assassination tale, concocted nearly a century later, appear to be a rather rational chronological documentation of plausible events.

This comparison to the JFK assassination simulated crisis is particularly apt, because it appears that once again, Rockefeller family members had collectively participated in perpetrating yet another grand historical hoax.
Leaving aside history’s indelible, mythical image handed down to posterity and carved into Mount Rushmore, from the standpoint of any thorough and objective analysis, America’s 16th president (7/Kabbalah Zayin the hook, or mind weapon) was essentially a one-term, if not ineffectual executive.

And yet, still more than a century later, American public school history books put forth their best, genuine efforts in continuing to hoist Abraham Lincoln to the lofty status of a mythical demi-god.

The clue to discerning why this should be so is in discovering who or perhaps more accurately, what family, still owns majority stock in the publishing media and thus a virtual monopoly on all print media distributed throughout the American public school system.

While reading on, loyal readers shall certainly ascertain the identity of that family, a prominent family of merchant bankers featured here several times before at Newsspell.

While on the one hand, such texts revel in hyperbole concerning the allegedly slain Civil-War era martyr, they are certainly correct (though in an unwitting if not ironic fashion) in describing the historical image of Abraham Lincoln, the small-time rural litigator transformed to wartime US president, as nothing more than the reflection of an idea placed in the mind, a purely fabricated myth.

Compared to past Newsspell exposes concerning other significant historical events of American history, one finds the popularized historical narrative of the Lincoln assassination to be exponentially rife with not only symbolic, numerological markers, but incredible inconsistencies and, ridiculous improbabilities compounded by glaring contradictions.

Peculiarly, in-depth research avails a most astonishing revelation: most historical scholars of American history admit to not having examined the Lincoln assassination to any great or penetrating degree. Another curious admission made by one noted historian who shall be referenced later on in this installment, is that Lincoln’s body guard was given the evening off on the night in question of the assassination to enjoy a drink in the nearby pub adjacent to Ford’s theater.

And yet, this same historian admits, due to the embers of hostility that still allegedly smoldered between the warring factions of North and South while the end of the American Civil War approached, there still remained enmity toward President Lincoln. Additionally, dangerous threats toward Lincoln by known Confederate sympathizer and would-be assassin, John Wilkes Booth, were known to have been publicly documented.

Does this scenario sound familiar folks? SEE:What really happened to JFK assassin Oswald? (Part III)

Several pertinent questions then remain: why should such obvious historical contradictions be left unexplored by historical scholars and, who gave Lincoln’s body guard the night off, leaving the war-beleaguered president virtually unprotected and vulnerable to attack?

Alas, a general consensus among historical scholars seems to indicate further analysis of such curious anomalies should be summarily ignored in lieu of reinforcing the established and accepted narrative that John Wilkes Booth, like alleged JFK assassin Lee Harvey Oswald nearly a century later, acted wholly and completely alone in creating a fiendish plot to assassinate an American president.

One’s primary hypothesis would indicate that, as in the case of other major historical events, the naked truth is almost always buried beneath an avalanche of lies and topped off with ornate fixtures of obscuring myths.

Before sifting through the particulars of the Lincoln assassination event, it shall be necessary to establish and amplify the broader historical perspective.


During the era of Abraham Lincoln, not only were great technological strides being made, but it was also a time of great economic transition. Prior to this time, America’s economy had been primarily agriculturally based.

However, moving forward into the mid-nineteenth century, America’s incremental transition from an agrarian society into an industrial giant had begun to rapidly advance.

In order to smoothly facilitate America’s transition into the industrial age, it had been foreseen that vast expansions in terms of total workforce capabilities were required. Geographically speaking, with strides toward industrialized mass production of commercial goods already well underway in the Northeast, it was envisioned that machine-aided farming implements and mass production would greatly enhance the overall profitability of America’s vast, agriculturally based plantations, located primarily in the nation’s southern regions.

But such a monumental transition also required a change in the legal and administrative status of the plantation workers, so that their labor could be efficiently, legally, and profitably taxed by the US corporation.

Recall that the US corporation was founded as a commercial outpost for the sole benefit of the thirteen, ruling elite families. Prominent merchant banking families, such as the Rockefellers and Rothschilds, were deployed at the behest of these families to help monopolize all human and natural resources, thus establishing for their ruling elite masters a hegemonic industrial power that, in future, could be used as a geopolitical stalking horse as well a lucrative economic haven from which to continually draw monstrous profits. Conceptually, industrialization was merely a created tool which the ruling elite families could ably wield in service to their ongoing quest to secure and maintain vastly profitable American commercial markets for the foreseeable future.

Such a sweeping transition to a fully industrialized economy required not only changes to the legal, administrative, and taxation systems, but in order to fully facilitate the unimpeded flow of commercial trade production and distribution, massive alterations and construction overhauls to geographically strategic infrastructures were required in the way of new railroad systems, commercial toll roads, bridges and sea ports.

And how was all of this industrial progress ultimately financed?

As clever merchant bankers, those numbered among the shrewdly calculating Rockefellers and Rothschilds knew that to generate and safely secure profits while minimizing financial risk, one must never foolishly invest their own capital in any prospective commercial business project or venture.

Rather, with the issue of bonds and high-interest bearing loans to the united franchised states falling under the legal umbrella of the US corporation, merchant banking families such as the Rockefellers and Rothschilds envisioned establishing sources of financial revenue in perpetuity from the return on the interest alone. With the influx of the first wave of migrant workers from Western and Eastern Europe just beginning to populate the growing metropolitan urban centers of the American North during the era of the mid-nineteenth century and, with the so-called “emancipation” of the “slaves” employed on the vast agrarian farms called “plantations” located in America’s southern regions, the ruling elites anticipated the growing emergence of an exponentially vast and legally taxable workforce from which to draw generations of enormous profits.

But, knowing the masses would not willingly shell out their hard-earned taxes derived from their labor to finance such a grand project, they needed an epic and dramatic event capable of inducing the public’s maximum emotional investment. Thus, in order to make America’s incremental transition from an agrarian based economy to a fully industrialized one appear to be the natural course of history, the ruling elites knew they needed to do what they’ve always done throughout the centuries: divide the people into opposing sides then greet them to oppose one another through the course of a stage managed conflict or war.

By the beginning of the American industrial revolution, the Rockefellers, along with other prominent and elite families harboring mutual financial interests, had majority control in the stock of all major metropolitan newspapers on both sides of the Mason-Dixon line. The Rockefellers then realized, it would become a rather simple matter to favorably control the flow of information concerning what the public read about the war, without them ever realizing the entire affair may have been a theatrically stage-managed psychological operation, designed to marshal enormous tax profits from the commercial monopolization of vast amounts of human and natural resources.

In order to make the war appear legal, of course, the Rockefellers needed complete control of the US corporation’s legally elected executive branch, with the power to enact extra-legal executive orders that during a declared state of war, could legally override any standard constitutional procedures and checks and balances. At this juncture of American history, this is where the mythical figure of Abraham Lincoln came into play.

From the time of his inauguration in 1861, Lincoln’s sole purpose would be to smoothly effect the legal prosecution of the “war”. Before his election to a second term in 1864, Lincoln composed a sealed document, the historical significance of which is still largely overlooked by historians. Nonetheless, the document stands as quite significant in demonstrating how, on behalf of his banking masters who funded his election campaigns, Lincoln was able to nullify established constitutional tenets while remaining in office during a declared state of “war” should his benefactors fail to secure him the “election” in 1864.

As it turned out, of course, Lincoln didn’t find it necessary to publicly exercise his pledge to defend the union in wartime as an insurance policy, because his ruling elite benefactors were able to fix the election in his favor. However, it is important to point out that, this extra-legal maneuver of Lincoln’s has never been rescinded, meaning the US corporation would remain in a perpetual state of “emergency” or “war”, thus justifying the continued siphoning of enormous tax profits.

Now moving forward into 1865, while assured of complete control of both the US corporation’s executive branch, the newspaper print media and an American public blinded by what they had been conditioned to believe was the fog of a Civil War, the Rockefellers were able to marshal forth more than the required man power and enormous financial resources in moving their industrial revolution scheme forward with lightning speed.


Though this fact is not regularly accentuated by American historical texts, Lincoln’s alleged assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was a renowned Shakespearean stage actor. Reportedly, even Lincoln himself, well before the fateful evening of April 14, 1865, had witnessed the accomplished young actor perform on several occasions.

Oddly, historical scholars seem to ignore Booth’s genealogical relations to not only the president’s first lady, Mary Lincoln, but to the president himself (More on this later).

As loyal readers have certainly surmised, these facts represent anomalies that cannot be wholly or even partially dismissed when attempting to formulate and compile a complete and accurate historical analysis of the 16th American president’s alleged assassination. Like seemingly all such dramatic, historical narratives featuring the alleged involvement of lone madmen, the fact that Booth strangely seemed to have lacked a discernable and clear motive for killing the president, therefore begs obvious speculations as to what his ultimate motivation may have been.

Here is an account from a noted historical scholar, Doctor Michael W. Kaufman, who speculates that despite ‘considerable concern among those closest to Lincoln about his security at the end of the Civil War and for the president’s life’, Lincoln’s alleged assassin was successful in his murderous endeavor perhaps because he was so determined to “immortalize” himself. (https://www.abrahamlincolnsclassroom.org/abraham-lincoln-in-depth/president-lincolns-assassination/

“Booth managed to organize and run a dangerous plot – undetected – in the face of unprecedented government paranoia. While many people assumed that hidden forces were behind the assassination, other speculated that Booth acted on his own. The reason: he wished to immortalize himself. Within days of the shooting, newspapers began to report that an anonymous source had once heard Booth talk about killing the president. Asked why he would do such a thing, he quoted a couplet from the Colley Cibber version of Richard III:

The daring youth that fired the Ephesian dome

Outlives in fame the pious fool that reared it.

“The story spread quickly, and it became the basis of the most popular explanation for Lincoln’s killing. But it has the character of modern urban legend. Though it sounded authoritative, its original source has never been identified.”

Urban legend, indeed.

And, Kaufmann hints upon what are the most essential ingredients in the success of any large-scale psychological operation: 1.) The perceived authority and conditioned trust factor of the information’s source rather than considerations of the nature of the information’s substance, no matter how dubious and 2.) The repetitive nature of the information which best secures the targets uncritical emotional and psychological investment, therefore ensuring their wholesale belief in what it is they are repeatedly being told.

Although one shall proceed to highlight those aspects of the Lincoln assassination narrative that seem most anomalous and even dubious, yet another interesting tidbit concerns Lincoln’s body guard who was inexplicably – despite the palpable existence of what were claimed as imminent threats to the president’s life – sent off to the nearby pub for a drink

And what folks, do you suppose the name of Lincoln’s body guard was – wait for it folks – PARKER, John Parker.

Parker is a name seemingly recycled endlessly in connection to psychological operations that later leave an indelible imprint upon not only history books, but succeeding generations of those that either read or hear about them and unquestioningly believe the unconfirmed veracity of every detail.

Not only should loyal readers recall the name of Parker from the Sandy Hook mass casualty simulation in 2012, but is should also be noted the name Parker sums to 69 in English Ordinal gematria (6=33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry).

Its Full Reverse Reduction sums to 39 which reduces to 3 (12/21/777 intelligence joker code/3=EE/33)

In recounting some of the more absurd details of the Lincoln assassination, it shall be important to recall that the alleged assassin, John Wilkes Booth, was not only an actor but related to the president’s first lady, but not in the identical fashion alternative researchers have lead you to believe (more on that revelation later).

And folks, Booth was not just any run-of-the-mill actor, he was primarily noted for his performances of Shakespearean tragedies, particularly his critically acclaimed performance in the legendary Bard’s Richard III.

It is also important to note that, in terms of the International Brotherhood of Freemasonry and their connections to the establishment and constant reinforcement of historical myths through the staging of historical events, the pantomime repetition of Shakespearean tragedy. echoed throughout American history, marks a key cornerstone in understanding the true nature of the prevailing actor based reality. SEE: Diana: The myth made people’s princess (Part IV)

Though it is claimed Lincoln attended several of Booth’s performances prior to the fateful evening of April 14, 1865 at Ford’s theater, the published accounts of one Mary Clay, a friend of the Lincoln family and who along with the president, his first lady and several others reportedly attended Booth’s performance in “The Marble Heart” at Ford’s theater on November 9, 1863, read very oddly to say the very least (from page 243 of Mary, Wife of Lincoln, published in 1928 and written by Clay’s niece, Katherine Helm):

“In the theater President and Mrs. Lincoln, Miss Sallie Clay and other gentlemen farther around. Twice Booth in uttering disagreeable threats in the play came very near and put his finger close to Mr. Lincoln’s face; when he came a third time I was impressed by it, and said, “Mr. Lincoln, he looks as if he meant that for you.” “Well,” he said, “he does look pretty sharp at me, doesn’t he?” At the same theater, the next April, Wilkes Booth shot our dear President. Mr. Lincoln looked to me the personification of honesty, and when animated was much better looking than his pictures represent him.” Mary Clay, in her reminiscence, was off by a year when she said the president was shot “the next April.”

Reading this, does the manner of description indeed resemble the after-the-fact accounts of crisis actors participating in the latest mass casualty crisis event promoted by MSM, designed to make the targeted audience believe an actual event was witnessed?

It seems, Clay’s account, documented in print years later, resembles a desperate and deliberate effort to place a corroborative witness at the scene of a manufactured crime.

The passage of text cited above provides a clear glimpse into the ruling elite’s methods of psychological operation, in that the power of suggestion is always utilized to maximum effect in bringing imaginary ideas or images into material being.

But not only was the Lincoln assassination a staged psychological operation, but in every case investigated, the president’s attendance at Booth’s performances appears to be a genuine attempt to set up a continuing narrative of time, place, and detail, all designed to lead the target of the psychological operation to the inevitable conclusion that there can be no doubt Booth killed the 16th US president on the night in question at Ford’s theater.

Which leads one to an interesting but perhaps inevitable hypothesis.

Given it has already been established that by the mid-19th century, the Rockefellers had acquired firm control of the US corporation’s banking structure and the print media and, given loyal readers also know that the Rockefellers were the prime participants in the JFK hoax assassination taking place nearly a century later, could it be that both President Lincoln and his alleged assassin, Booth, were not who history claims?

Could it be, that as in the case of the simulated JFK presidential assassination, Rockefeller family members were once again playing at performing historical roles on history’s grand stage play?

When watching the video displayed above, did anyone notice the conspicuous numerological markers associated with this historical event?

Time of assassination: 10:15=25/7 Kabbalah Zayin/the mind weapon

Alleged weapon of assassin: .44 caliber pistol=44/destruction code

Assassin Booth shot to death, April 26=26/2 6’s/12/21/777/4+26=30/3/EE/33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry

Lincoln died at 7:22=29/2 9’s/18/666/occult mirror reversal=2 6’s/12/21/777

# of states funeral train passed through=7/Kabbalah Zayin the mind weapon

In dramatic anticipation of part II coming very soon, in the meantime, one will leave loyal readers with a pair of images. Looking closely, can you see any similarities?

John D. Rockefeller:


Abraham Lincoln:





Leave a Reply