Abraham Lincoln’s Masterpiece ‘Reality’ Theater

History is the recording of fables, manufactured stories by scholarly, academic consensus.

Over time, historical fables can be manipulated or tweaked to fit the capricious tastes of political or social propagandists. While the public’s perception towards the foundational template of the historical narrative regarding the “assassination” of President Abraham Lincoln remains unaltered, still, from time to time, the public has been conditioned to tolerably allow for dramatically inspired narrative elements to be newly introduced into the public discourse and into historical record. In consideration of the bigger picture, as it were, to those counted among the scholarly perpetrators of the story of Lincoln’s historic presidency and the ‘assassination’ fable, the public’s fickle perception of newly introduced details augmenting the historical narrative is irrelevant, as long as a majority among successive generations of the American general public continue to wholeheartedly believe in the core fabricated legend. Namely – that Lincoln ‘freed the slaves’, heroically preserved the American union, and was indeed tragically murdered by ‘assassin’ John Wilkes Booth at Ford’s theater.

However, as shall be further demonstrated, each of these historical assertions hold no veracity and amount to nothing more than blatant falsehoods and deliberately engineered hoodwinks.

It shall also be demonstrated that John Wilkes Booth, the noteworthy theater actor alleged to have been Lincoln’s ‘assassin’, was an intelligence asset of the Pinkertons, the forerunning police/security organization of the U.S. president’s Secret Service, a double agent posed as a Confederate sympathizer/provocateur with connections to not only high-degree freemason Albert Pike but to revolutionary and agent provocateur Guiseppe Mazzini and to a member of the Orsini family, an historically powerful and influential clan of European aristocrats whose genealogical history consists of Vatican pontiffs.

LINCOLN FALSEHOODS & HOODWINKS

Wikipedia and other historical sources inform that Abraham Lincoln was born into poverty in an Illinois log cabin, was uneducated but self-taught and that somehow after having passed the bar exam went on to become an attorney and, later, before being elected U.S. president, he rose to become a small-time state and federal legislator. From a grander perspective and when examined in greater detail, Lincoln’s political ascendance to the U.S. presidency after gaining the nomination of the then newly formed Republican party in 1860 appears puzzling.

According to official historical accounts, Lincoln’s comparatively mediocre career in public, political life peaked in 1849 and was essentially over. Lincoln’s only claim to prominence and burgeoning popular renown subsequent to holding political office and before being nominated for election to the American presidency by the upstart Republican party in 1860 was his series of public debates with Senator Stephen Douglas, in which Lincoln articulated his misgivings concerning the Kansas-Nebraska Act and its relationship to the spread of slavery to newly acquired American territories. Prior to becoming U.S. president in 1861, Lincoln was a political neophyte and lightweight legislator who appeared comparatively unqualified to assume an executive decision-making position overseeing the affairs of State and, as a minor league country attorney, seemingly ill-prepared to assume the role of a major influential political statesman on both the national and world stage.

The popular notion that emancipation of southern plantation slaves stands as the historical hallmark of the Lincoln presidency can be easily dispelled. Assuredly, such a political maneuver was not motivated by lingering moral compunction but merely served as a historical smokescreen for the legal enslavement of all U.S. citizens as debtors to the City of London’s Crown Temple bankers and the Vatican’s Swiss banking consortium.

The American Civil War, over which U.S. president Abraham Lincoln presided, was precipitated to bankrupt the American Republic and to unite the states, both in the northern and southern geographical regions, under the corporate umbrella (aka Crown Corporation) of the United States (aka Virginia Company) headquartered in the city-state/principality of Washington’s District of Columbia, legally establishing it as a corporate subsidiary of City of London’s Crown Temple, the contractual terms and conditions of which are detailed in the District of Columbia Organic Act, congressionally legislated in 1871. Up to that time, the labor pool of southern plantation workers – in a legal context, the term ‘plantation’ denotes a corporate entity – was not a matter of federal administrative record nor had it been uniformly taxed. The establishment of Washington D.C. as the United States, a Crown subsidiary corporation, six years after the cessation of what has been made to historically appear as American civil hostilities, helped to mitigate this problem on behalf of the commercial interests of both the City of London’s Crown Temple and the Vatican’s Swiss bankers. According to Baron vs. Mayor and City of Baltimore 32 U.S. 243, since 1871, the subsidiary Crown Corporation known as the United States has operated under the Virginia Charter of 1602 and the U.S. constitution was legally invalidated by the Vatican’s ratification of the Treaty of Verona in 1822. A little-known fact is that between the years 1853-1857, Jefferson Davis – prior to becoming president, commander and chief of the confederacy – served as President Franklin Pierce’s Secretary of War, and that during Davis’s tenure, huge sums were spent on building up military armaments.  

Though Abraham Lincoln is historically credited with ‘preserving the American union’ and ’emancipating the slaves’, these are merely falsehoods perpetrated by a consensus of compromised academics to cover up a darker truth. The truth is that subsequent to the American ‘civil war’, all U.S. citizens born within the contiguous boundaries of the states (aka Crown Estates) were legally transformed into tax paying employees/laborers (aka persons in the form of commercially exploitable human resources/corporate legal fictions) indebted in perpetuity to the City of London’s subsidiary Crown Corporation, the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (aka Washington D.C./Virginia Company).

As shall be further explained, not a shred of credibility can be lent to the popularized story of Lincoln’s ‘assassination’, alleged by historians to have taken place on April 14, 1865. First off, everyone should take note of the occultic codes marking that particular date: 1.) April marks the beginning of Beltane, an occult holiday/fire ritual, 2.) 14th day=77/Alistair Crowley’s Liber Al/Land of Oz, 3.) Year of 1865 (1+8=9/6+5=11) = 9/11(IXXI/death and resurrection ritual of the mythical phoenix/fire bird).

Furthermore, although American history texts accentuate Abraham Lincoln’s rural and poverty-stricken emanations, they are loath to detail Lincoln’s confirmed genealogical connections – as has proved to be the case with a majority of U.S. presidents – with British royalty. More specifically, to British monarch Queen Victoria of the House of Hanover/Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. According to Burke’s peerage and to an article published at civilwar.gratzpa.org – SEE: https://civilwar.gratzpa.org/2011/12/royal-ancestry-of-president-abraham-lincoln/ – Lincoln was not only genealogically related to several previous American presidents, including George Washington, but he was also related to King Edward I, to Queen Victoria and also to commanding confederate civil war general Robert E. Lee.

This verifiable information obliterates the historically accepted idea that Abraham Lincoln was merely a simple country attorney from the backwoods of Illinois who was alleged to have been born in some ramshackle log cabin.

The fact that Lincoln was an attorney before the lightning ascendence of his historic political career began serves as an investigative clue.

The U.S. legal system is controlled by City of London’s Middle Crown Temple, and all attorney’s called to the bar take an oath to serve the Crown Corporation. Taking this into deeper consideration, it becomes evident that the ‘official’ biographical narrative established and agreed upon by historians concerning Abraham Lincoln is a ruse and was erected upon a familiar romantic template – that of one rising from obscure peasantry to world class renown – synonymous with other similar historical figures previously held subject to investigation.

Not surprisingly, therefore, it turns out that further investigation reveals “Abraham Lincoln” was an historical fabrication and as shall be demonstrated a bit later, in depth image comparison analysis indicates that photographs and portraits of “Lincoln” depict the modified visage of one of Lincoln’s prominent contemporaries, a political colleague and high-level public figure, respected statesman and New York attorney of some renown who also happened to be a presidential candidate representing the nascent Republican party in 1860 at the dawn of America’s civil conflict.

MASONIC HIDDEN HAND

Many of the principal historical figures associated with the American civil war – military officers, generals, and even President Abraham Lincoln – have been photographed demonstrating masonic derived gestures and or donned in paraphernalia in the form of headwear which are highly symbolic and of valued but hidden significance to those among the freemasonic brotherhood. Not only was confederate general Robert E. Lee genealogically related to Abraham Lincoln, but photographic evidence suggests he was also a sworn member of freemasonry’s ranks. Additional photographic evidence shows both Lee and some of his military colleagues and contemporaries, both confederate and union, demonstrating the masonic hidden hand (aka left-hand path), better known to freemasons as the sign of the second veil, indicating the sworn masonic candidate has entered the 7th degree of the Royal Arch, a degree associated with the color of purple. Photographic evidence confirms that this identical masonic hand gesture – sign of the second veil – has also been demonstrated by several major historical figures such as Josef Stalin, Winston Churchill (aka Alistair Crowley/Prince George, Duke of Kent/Bob Hope/Jack Benny), Karl Marx, Adolf Hitler (aka King Leopold III of Belgium/Bing Crosby/Allen Dulles/Truman Capote/Alger Hiss/Roman Polanski/Danny Kaye), President Franklin Delano Roosevelt (aka Prince Tassilo von Furstenberg/Jimmy Stewart/Henry Fonda/Fred Astaire/Walt Disney/Walter Cronkite), and Mahatma Ghandi who, like Abraham Lincoln, was also an attorney called to the bar in sworn allegiance to the City of London’s Middle Crown Temple.

SEE: Cold Blooded Truth about Truman Capote

SEE also: JFK Hoax Executed by Wizards of Oz

Below: General Ulysses S. Grant, General Robert E. Lee, General William Tecumseh Sherman

The aforementioned Franklin Pierce, the president who appointed Jefferson Davis as Secretary of War, can be observed in the following image demonstrating the hidden hand of the masonic second veil.

Below: Franklin Pierce 

In the following image, everyone will observe that President Abraham Lincoln is donned in a stovepipe hat while surrounded with a pair of what appear to be union military officers demonstrating the hidden masonic hand of the second veil associated with the 7th degree of the Royal Arch. In the context of freemasonry, the wearing of such headgear is a privilege reserved only for the Master of the Lodge.

PINKERTON INTELLIGENCE PLANT

During the course of one’s investigation into the Lincoln “assassination”, a pertinent article was discovered published at https://quod.lib.umich.edu which included the following rather extraordinary claim.

“Very few academic historians have studied Lincoln’s assassination in any depth.” 

In other words, the enormous volumes of ‘official’ historical accounts written by scores of credentialed academics regarding this topic can be characterized as superficial if not dubious in nature.   

This could be due to the fact that whichever direction one’s in-depth investigation into the “assassination” of “Abraham Lincoln” travels, one runs into principals connected to either intelligence organizations, the spy trade, or to the Pinkerton National Detective Agency, established in 1850 by Allen Pinkerton and Chicago attorney Edward Rucker. Between 1870-1890, Pinkerton was the largest private law enforcement agency in the world and at the apex of its notoriety, became the template upon which the American Secret Service was later developed. In the decades following the American civil conflict, Pinkerton agency was often employed to spy on high-level members of the American labor movement and its agents were routinely utilized as labor union busting agent provocateurs. The methods of operation used by the Pinkerton agency – information, intelligence gathering through informants, spies, role playing undercover/planted agents – even influenced methods later utilized by CIA, FBI. The Pinkerton agency is still in operation today and is owned by Securitas AB, a Swedish security company based in Stockholm named in honor of the ancient Roman goddess of security and stability. The Pinkerton Detective Agency’s logo conspicuously features a rather familiar example of occult symbolism – the Eye of Horus, the sun god. 

The Pinkerton Agency first reached national recognition when co-founder Allen Pinkerton became noted for his alleged foiling of a plot on the life of President Lincoln in Baltimore, Maryland. Interestingly, census records from this period list the Booth family as Baltimore residents. While various historical sources and even Jesuit/CIA controlled Wikipedia admit that reports, rumors of the conspiratorial plot on Lincoln’s life shortly after being elected in 1860 may have lacked credibility, it was insistent warnings made by Pinkerton, William H. Seward and Seward’s son Frederick which nevertheless persuaded the newly elected chief executive to give credence to claims that a possible assassination plot was afoot and that their concerns for the president’s safety deserved taking necessary and even extreme precautions. At one point after his inauguration, Lincoln even went so far as to threaten members of the Maryland legislature suspected of confederate sympathies with arrest. Somehow historians, academics ignore this documented act of despotism while hailing Lincoln as a slave liberator.

Nevertheless, the fact that William H. Seward, appointed as Lincoln’s Secretary of State, played a prominent role along with Allen Pinkerton and his legions of spies, informants as culprits to assassination alarmism so soon after Lincoln’s election and presidential inauguration served as a key clue in not only detecting the level of chicanery and deception involved but helped with confirming identification of the man behind the mask of the legendary historical fabrication known as “Abraham Lincoln”. It seems also likely that Lincoln’s alleged Baltimore plot was a Pinkerton fabrication, designed primarily as a public relations stunt to widen the scope of the agency’s profile. 

But before getting much deeper into Abraham Lincoln, there is the question of Lincoln’s alleged “assassin”, John Wilkes Booth. As is well known and historically documented, during America’s civil war period, Booth was an acclaimed theater actor. Undoubtedly, at some point, Booth’s noted skills as a professional actor attracted the interest of Allen Pinkerton and his private secret police agency as to the prospect of planting Booth in the spy trade as a role-playing intelligence asset.

After all, if the study of ‘history’ has taught us anything, it’s that professional actors also make great spies, intelligence plants.

According to most historical sources, though Booth resided in what was then demarcated as union territory during the American civil war, inexplicably, he evaded being called up for enlistment or drafted for military service.

Perhaps this was because Booth was already employed as a Pinkerton spy.

An article published at clevelandcivilwarroundtable.com, details that during late1864, Booth was travelling back and forth between Boston, New York, Philadelphia, and Washington. While in Montreal, Booth met with George N. Sanders, a known European revolutionary and political radical. Sanders, in turn, had met regularly with other European revolutionaries and political radicals such as Guiseppe Mazzini and Felice Orsini, a member of the wealthy, powerful, and influential Orsini family which has three Vatican popes listed on its family tree. Both in writing and spoken word, Sanders, Mazzini, and Orsini made no secret of their preference for assassination – even if the act were only symbolic – as an effective means to further revolutionary political objectives. 

Meanwhile, throughout the period of America’s civil war, Robert E. Lee and confederate president Jefferson Davis had correspondence and held meetings with James Clark, a fellow West Point graduate and Jesuit trained professor at Georgetown University, a Jesuit founded institution. Mazzini had known correspondence with confederate general and sovereign grand commander of the masonic Scottish Rite Albert Pike, author of the weighty and legendary masonic tome, Morals and Dogma, which outlined the Jesuit-controlled masonic order’s future plans for three world wars. 

According to an article found at https://history.state.gov, written correspondence between Jefferson Davis and Vatican Pope Pius IX is recorded in the congressional record, correspondence which apparently was known to William H. Seward, Lincoln’s Secretary of State. Davis’s letters penned to Pope Pius were an appeal to the pontiff and to the Vatican to officially recognize the confederacy as sovereign territory, a calculated maneuver which only bolstered the union’s resolve in later moving forward with legislation such as the District of Columbia Organic act, legally positioning the states firmly under the corporate umbrella of City of London’s Crown Temple and dooming successive generations of American citizens in indebted servitude to the Vatican’s Swiss banking consortium. As for Booth, while still residing in union territory, posing as a confederate spy during most of 1864 prior to Lincoln’s “assassination”, it appears that the renowned theater actor was not only recruited as a Pinkerton intelligence plant but busy acting as a double agent. Which brings us to examining the ‘official’ historical record of the Lincoln “assassination”. On its face, the entire story is tantamount to gross absurdity.            

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS!  

From any objective standpoint, the ‘official’ historical account of Lincoln’s “assassination” does not appear credible. Clues that the veracity of the historical record is dubious are quite manifest. For one, the “assassination” took place at Ford’s theater, a structure designed for public enjoyment of scripted amusements known as plays. This detail exists as an in joke among the hidden Jesuit-controlled masonic perpetrators of Lincoln’s “assassination” hoax while serving as a cruel mockery to the unsuspecting general public. Booth had appeared on stage at Ford’s theater many times, starring in several Shakespearean productions, some of which Abraham Lincoln personally attended. Wikipedia reports that the theater’s proprietor, John T. Ford, was a personal friend of John Wilkes Booth and a friend of the Booth family. On the night of April 14, 1865, historical accounts report that, despite being armed with a knife and a loaded derringer, Booth was admitted to Lincoln’s balcony after passing a note to the usher. Since Booth’s confederate sympathies and his stated intentions to do the president harm were publicly well-known, it seems unlikely, even absurd, that Booth would have so readily and easily gained access to the president. More absurdly, it is claimed that the man appointed as Lincoln’s personal security guard, John Frederick Parker, a member of the metropolitan police force, was absent from Lincoln’s balconied theater box and was out having drinks at a nearby tavern with Lincoln’s valet and his coachman, where he proceeded to get drunk and fall asleep. However, it turns out, this sort of bizarre behavior was not uncommon. Parker had a reputation as a drunkard and as a regular patron of brothels, and though he had been previously reprimanded for derelictions of duty by his superiors, Parker’s employment as a police officer somehow remained intact.

After gaining ready access to the president’s theater box, it is claimed Booth proceeded to draw out his derringer, killing the president with one shot to the back of Lincoln’s head. Booth then reportedly drew out his concealed dagger to stab Major Henry Rathbone, a union military officer seated in proximity to the president and his wife. Rather than escape the way he came in, through the balcony doorway, it is alleged that Booth vaulted over the balcony’s ledge and on to the stage with the bloody dagger still clasped in his hand, whereupon he delivered a line in classical Latin to the audience from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar – ‘Sic Semper Tyrannis!’ (Thus, always to tyrants!).

Booth’s Shakespearean oration included as part of the ‘official’ Lincoln “assassination” historical narrative exists as yet another clue from the hidden Jesuit/masonic perpetrators, revealing the theatrical and scripted nature of the staged hoax. With tongues firmly planted in their cheeks, the hidden perpetrators of the hoax (psychological operation) are also clueing the deceived public in to the fact that Booth’s speech while on stage at Ford’s theater after assassinating Lincoln is also reminiscent of the famous monologue from Act II Scene VII Line 139 – “All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players” – of Shakespeare’s comedy As You Like It.

Yes, it was a comedy, and the hidden perpetrators – Jesuit lackeys, masonic jokers – are still laughing at the oblivious proletariat for interpreting scripted fables as American history.

It should be noted that Booth’s previous role in Julius Caesar starring as Marc Anthony was hailed by New York theater critics as one of the most stunning portrayals they had yet seen and yet the possibility that Lincoln’s “assassination” was just another acting job for Booth has never occurred to those considered rationally minded historians, academics.

Furthermore, despite what must have been the earsplitting volume of a gunshot in a closed theater designed for acoustical effectiveness and his prolonged and rather conspicuous struggle with Rathbone up in the presidential theater box overlooking the stage, historical accounts uniformly claim that Booth’s murderous rampage went largely unnoticed by the capacity audience due to the fact, so it is claimed, that Booth’s gunshot had been muffled by the audience’s laughter in response to a humorous exchange among the actors on stage at Ford’s theater. That particular claim appears utterly preposterous, of course, but nonetheless it remains generally accepted and unquestioned by historians, public-school history students and teachers. It seems equally preposterous that no one seated among the theater audience, namely Charles Hamlin, a union military officer and son of Lincoln’s then Vice President, Hannibal Hamlin, who was reported to be in attendance with his sister, chose not to intervene and confront the president’s “assassin”. Instead, we are led to believe that, after performing his dramatic Shakespearean-inspired speech, Booth remained unmolested, merely absconded from the stage and escaped to safety.

Given the absurdity of the Lincoln assassination narrative, it appears the audience at Ford’s theater on the evening of April 14, 1865, were active participants in a staged psychological operation enclosed in a highly controlled environment. More suspiciously, soon after the “assassination”, Ford’s theater was appropriated by the U.S. corporate government which issued an order that the theater would thereafter be prohibited from being used as an entertainment venue. Later, it was inhabited by the U.S. War Department as a government record office.

In the immediate aftermath of Lincoln’s “assassination”, Lafeyette Baker, an investigator and spy employed at the National Detective Bureau, assembled a search team to apprehend Booth who remained at large. Investigative intuition signals that Wikipedia and other MSM sources are being coy about Baker’s job description in a deliberate attempt to conceal that Baker, like Booth, was another Pinkerton agent. According to the aforementioned article published at https://quod.lib.umich.edu, Booth had escaped to a tobacco barn located on a farm owned by the Garret family where he remained at large from Baker and his search party for twelve days before, it is alleged, a man named Boston Corbett discovered his whereabouts and proceeded to gun him down.

Surely, everyone noticed that the number of days Booth was alleged to have remained hidden, according to historical, academic sources, is marked with occult significance: Twelve days/12=21(law of occult mirrored reversal) =3 7’s/777, Alistair Crowley’s Kabbalah joker intelligence code.

As for Abraham Lincoln, image comparison, facial recognition, and ear biometric analysis turned up a shocking revelation, serving as the coup de grace which completely undermines the official historical account of not only Lincoln’s alleged “assassination”, but the legendary status bestowed to his presidency by scores of compromised academics and historians.

LINCOLN=SEWARD=DAVIS

Comparative image comparison, facial recognition analysis between William H. Seward and Abraham Lincoln indicate that the proportional structures of the respective eyes, brows, nasolabial folds, noses, and cheekbones are similar if not identical. Ear biometric analysis confirms the epidermal structures, shapes of the respective ears are identical. Everyone will also observe that the respective hairlines are also identical. It should be noted that in many of the images featuring Abraham Lincoln, it appears that portions of the facial geometry have been strategically modified. For example, the prominent mole observed on the lower half of Lincoln’s face appears to be an epidermal fabrication. The faux beard also appears to have been strategically applied as a theatrical affectation.

Below: Abraham Lincoln, William H. Seward

More remarkably, image comparison and ear biometric analysis indicate that the epidermal structures, proportionality, and shapes of the respective ears observed in the following images are identical. Comparative facial recognition analysis also indicates that the epidermal structures of the respective noses between confederate president Jefferson Davis and William H. Seward is proportionally identical. 

Below: Abraham Lincoln, William H. Seward, Jefferson Davis