PM Starmer’s Storm of Lies

Politicians are nothing more than professional liars. While some may be better or more subtle practitioners than their colleagues, never has there been a more blatant example than Kier Starmer, current British Prime Minister. Worse, even when caught in his own intricate web of lies by MSM commentators, Starmer’s first impulse is to remain aloof, unflappable and to proceed with his badly conceived political charade. While exuding the personality of a vacant eyed autism-stricken wind-up toy robot, it seems inconceivable how Starmer could have inspired confidence in anyone, much less galvanize a political constituency to cast votes in his favor, enough to secure his lofty position as the UK’s Prime Minister.

Below: British PM Kier Starmer

Though lately it seems his favorability rating among the British public has plummeted to a shocking nadir, while seemingly oblivious to the growing number of hostile attacks to his failing leadership and unmoved by his shrinking popularity index, Starmer, the former Middle Temple barrister, soldiers on, cast in his dubious role as paper mâché puppet for the City of London’s Crown Temple bankers. Like all such high-level political figures, Starmer wasn’t elected, he was selected then installed into Ten Downing Street precisely because he was judged to be a compulsive and even pathological liar, a propensity which made him useful to his overseeing masters and benefactors, someone who could unabashedly take the blame as the crumbling economy of Britian is significantly downsized and then reconfigured with a digitized currency/ID system centrally controlled by artificial intelligence. It comes as no surprise then to find that “Starmer” has been identified as a fabricated character scheme portrayed by someone who makes his living playing pretend as an accomplished actor, one who has been awarded a Hollywood Oscar and in fact was knighted by the British monarchy.

SOCIALIST OR CONSERVATIVE?

The political spectrum divided into left and right, liberal and conservative exists as a deliberately created and polarizing artifice designed to keep the populace’s attention focused on fabricated issues and diverted from the genuine objectives of the hidden rulers, the true power behind visible governance. This points to the differences in perception regarding the nature of politics between the ruling families and the general public. To the ruling families, politics is the shameless but covert pursuit of self-interest in maintaining hegemonic wealth and power through the commercial and profitable exploitation of human and natural resources, while the proletariat have been educated to believe that historically, politics is merely the democratic struggle of competing ideas, ideologies, and philosophies. While the left side of the political spectrum has primarily remained preoccupied with issues concerning civil liberties and with legislatively imposing limitations on what it perceives to be excessive entrepreneurial and economic liberty, traditionally, those counted on the political right have staunchly remained supportive of eliminating legislative limitations to economic freedom at the expense of civil liberties. From a larger perspective, one political extreme cannot exist without the other, and while the illusion that one side, for a time at least during each election cycle, periodically gains an advantage over the other proves effective in maintaining a balance of political attrition and governing stability useful to the clandestine corporate, sovereign owners, the marketing, promotion of this illusion by the MSM, in turn, keeps the politically misinformed, naive public, regardless of party affiliation, duped into surrendering legal consent through voter registration to a governing system posing as “democratic” but secretly working counter to their interests.

To the extent that both forms of liberty represented by the left and right of the political spectrum remain systematically suppressed, weakened, the hidden owners of governing bureaucracies, the legal system and central banks – City of London Crown Temple, Vatican/Swiss banking consortium – can rest assured their sovereign, princely, and royal liberties, governing hegemony will remain inviolable, protected. To perpetuate the illusion of the left/right political paradigm, the hidden owners need corporate front persons visible to the public, in so far as they are necessary as buffers and conspicuous targets at which the population can from time to time petulantly vent their frustrations and petty hatreds. In that sense, and given that his popularity rating continues to plunge, the UK’s current prime minister Kier Starmer appears to have been set up as the British public’s political punching bag, a ready, reliable but pathetic whipping post. Compounding this state of affairs is the fact that while prior to becoming “elected” prime minister Starmer publicly declared himself as a political conservative, there exists evidence to the contrary, copious evidence from his past that speaks otherwise, evidence which has been all but completely ignored by MSM talking heads, political pundits, and commentators in the UK.

Apparently, according to an article published at https://www.unz.com/article/finishing-the-job-starmer-the-pabloite/, during his youth in the 1980’s, Starmer became a member of Haldane Society of Socialist Lawyers and the co-editor of Socialist Alternatives, a short-lived magazine published in 1986-87 which served as a propaganda outlet for the British chapter of the International Marxist Tendency, a politically subversive organization headquartered in Paris, France. The article goes on to detail that during this time, Starmer was a follower of Greek political subversive Michael Raptis aka Pablo, a radical Marxist and secretary general of Fourth International founded by Leon Trotsky subsequent to his exile from the Soviet Union at the hands of Josef Stalin. Followers of this particular Pabloist brand of Marxism – “entryism” – advocate for subversive infiltration of mainstream political parties so as to masquerade their true intentions. Turns out, since taking up residence at Ten Downing Street, Starmer’s mask has begun to rapidly slip away, and the hidden hand of his political masters is beginning to show itself.

Like “Donald Trump” (aka Prince Stefano Casiraghi Grimaldi of Monaco/Brian Williams/Martin Sheen) in the U.S., Kier Starmer was installed as Prime Minister in the UK to continue the incremental implementation of the UN’s genocidal Agenda 2030/2050 and its seventeen sustainability goals, a global program of social and economic transformation designed to systematically replace employment sectors traditionally inhabited by human resources drawn from the working and middle classes with what has been dubbed the greater efficiency and “sustainability” of robotics and artificial intelligence and to establish a centrally controlled digital currency. Neither Starmer nor Trump can come right out and reveal the reality of the UN’s Agenda to their respective constituencies or to the general public at large of course, and so they must resort to semantically couching their scripted political messaging in alignment with familiar partisan-based jargon. Perhaps this is why mainstream political pundits, so-called “journalists”, and the MSM’s teleprompter reading anchorpersons have chosen to ignore the public record of Starmer’s Marxist past, since addressing that particular issue also risks exposing the rapidly advancing implementation of the UN’s Agenda 2030/2050 and the true objective of its seventeen “sustainability” goals to their targeted audiences. Of course, too, seasoned actors are particularly skilled at following scripts and playing roles, as is the actor portraying the prime minister known to the British public as “Starmer”, an actor who has starred in several high-profile and award-winning cinema productions, including the intelligence themed Kingsman: The Secret Service, and The King’s Speech, a movie with a plot centered around the problematic speech impediment of King George VI who struggled with an uncontrollable stammer. Intuitively, this plot feature turned out to be an investigative clue – Starmer/Stammer – which eventually helped to nail down the identity of the actor behind the modified mask of “Kier Starmer”. Incredibly enough, it also turns out that the spouse of the esteemed British actor identified in portrayal of “Kier Starmer” is also an accomplished voice coach.

SEE: https://katefirth.co.uk/clients/

OXFORD, THE JESUITS & FAKE COURT CASES

According to official biographical sources, including Wikipedia, Kier Starmer obtained a law degree from Oxford University, an institution which has been infiltrated by the Vatican Jesuit’s Society of Jesus. As most may recall from a previous article – Royal Minstrel Show Still Rolling – Oxford’s Campion Hall is hosted by the Jesuit order.  It is perhaps no coincidence then that Starmer, as a young barrister called to the Crown Temple bar after allegedly receiving a graduate law degree from Oxford, developed Marxist sympathies, given that both Marxism and social justice were conceptualized by a Jesuit scholar, Luigi Tapparelli D’Azeglio. An essay published in 2010 at https://www.forcingchange.org/theft-for-all/ by Carl Teichrib, not only points out the conceptually fallacious nature of ‘social justice’ but details the parallel historical relationship between the implementation of social change and social justice through a Jesuit and Marxist context. After becoming a barrister in 1987 and called to the bar of the City of London’s Middle Crown Temple, Starmer’s legal career took off on a fast-track trajectory.

While perceived to be an advocate of human rights, in 1990, Starmer became a member of Doughy Street Chambers and served as legal officer for Liberty (National Council for Civil Liberties), a UK based political pressure group. Founded in 1934, Liberty has featured a number of historical luminaries amongst its membership, including H.G. Wells, a proponent of global governance, eugenics, global depopulation, and Dame Rebecca West, who, due to previous investigation, was identified as a modified fabricated character scheme portrayed by Queen Elizabeth II (aka Lucille Ball, Jean Hill).

SEE: Something Royally Wrong with Rally Gunman Witness

Later, in 2008, Starmer was appointed head of both Crown Prosecution Services (CPS) and as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). In 2011, Starmer introduced reforms that included the first test paperless hearing, a technocratic maneuver which carries with it negative implications for the future of legal and court proceedings. Legal documents published in digital format can be routinely manipulated or even manufactured, and without a formal, physical paper trail to cross reference, records of admissible evidence collected by investigators and intended for presentation before judge and jury in high-profile cases can be conveniently expunged from both court and public records to suit the objectives of prevailing social and political agendas and those of Marxist leaning legal crusaders such as Kier Starmer. While heading the CPS and DPP, Starmer saw fit to reopen the 1993 Stephen Lawrence case, in which an eighteen-year-old black youth was allegedly stabbed to death by a band of six white perpetrators. Posed as a human rights crusader, Starmer argued that the crime was racially motivated. Upon further investigation, the crux of this case appears dubious. According to Wikipedia and other MSM sources, it is alleged that though the assailant’s stabbings punctured the victim’s lungs and severed major arteries, Lawrence was somehow able to abscond from the scene of the crime, running one-hundred and twenty meters before collapsing from severe blood loss. Surely, everyone detected the presence of numerological markers in this MSM promoted story which was likely to have been yet another media-generated hoax.

1.) 18 years of age=3 6’s or 666, 2.) six perpetrators (3+3) =33, highest degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry and 3.) one-hundred and twenty meters=12/21(law of occult mirrored reversal) or 3 7’s/777, Alistair Crowley’s Kabbalah joker intelligence code.

But there is an additional biographical detail just as damaging to the credibility of this MSM-driven story. Prior to his “murder”, perhaps unsurprisingly, Lawrence was an actor. According to Wikipedia, Lawrence starred as an extra in For Queen and Country, a film which also starred Hollywood actor Denzel Washington (aka Frankie Lymon/’Freeway’ Ricky Ross/Jay-Z) who has also proved to be a serial perpetrator of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.

Everyone will also surely notice that in the following image, Lawrence is donned in a black and white striped sweater, colors synonymous with the black and white ritualistic tracing boards which adorn freemasonic lodges. Notice also that a diamond is embossed on Lawrence’s sweater. In English ordinal gematria, the reduction cipher of the word diamond equals thirty-three, equivalent to the highest degree of Scottish Rite freemasonry. In addition, Lawrence is displaying a raised clenched fist, a gesture symbolically synonymous with Marxism, a political philosophy adopted by Starmer.

Turns out, the Steven Lawrence case wasn’t the only high-profile media-generated hoax with which Starmer was associated. According to documents released online by Reclaim These Streets, a feminist charity and fundraising organization associated with radical anarchist environmentalists Earth First, the group sought legal consultation from Starmer’s Doughy Street Chambers prior to launching their public protest subsequent to the alleged murder of thirty-three-year-old Sarah Everard on March 3rd (33), 2021.

Once again, there’s that omnipresent masonic numerological marker – 33 – appearing twice in the same news story.

Meaning, the Sarah Everard event was fabricated, scripted, and staged with the help of high-level freemasonic members of the British police guilds, including Metropolitan police chief Cressida Dick (aka Tatiana von Furstenberg/Sandy Hook’s Nelba Marquez Green/Patsey Ramsey/Tammy Taylor/Kim Goldman) then promoted by the MSM to mass market a social and political agenda of paramount importance to the ruling families, the majority owners of the central banks and corporate television networks.

SEE: DeSantis Deception Delves Much Deeper

As for Reclaim These Streets, though claiming to be non-profit, such organizations are not immune from the seduction of instant publicity and overwhelming financial support offered to them in the wake of such manufactured agenda-driven news stories in the form of donations from an unsuspecting public moved to sympathy for their cause through barrages of emotional manipulation and psychological coercion of their sentimental sensibilities at the hands of BBC (aka MI7) and other corporately owned MSM television networks.

PM STARMER=SIR COLIN FIRTH

In the pair of following images – noted/arrowed with red marker – everyone will begin to notice through mere ocular comparison the identical epidermal architectures of the respective chins, jawlines, eyes, noses, cheeks, and brows. Extensive facial recognition, image comparison analysis confirms this while ear biometric comparison analysis demonstrates that the epidermal and structural architectures of the respective lobes and inner ears are identical.

Below from L to R: Kier Starmer, Sir Colin Firth

Regarding the ears, everyone will observe in the following pair of images – as indicated by arrowed red marker – that the top outer portion of the ears sloping into the respective lobes both have a unique and distinctive architecture, helping to positively identify award-winning British actor Sir Colin Firth as the host actor in portrayal of the current British PM, “Kier Starmer”. Comparative teeth analysis also demonstrates that “Starmer” and his live-action role player Sir Colin Firth have identically shaped, structured, and aligned cuspids.

Below from L to R: Sir Colin Firth, Kier Starmer

In addition, image comparison analysis indicates that the respective spouses of both PM “Starmer” and Sir Colin Firth appear strikingly similar.