Since, it has been empirically demonstrated US President Donald Trump is a European royal in disguise (Prince Stefano Casiraghi of Monaco), it should also come as no surprise, to one’s loyal readers, the proceedings to impeach the sitting president of the US corporation are fraudulent as well.

In fact, it shall be proved, the congressional “impeachment” proceedings are nothing more than a grand Hollywood-styled production; a prime example of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.

One of the emerging stars of this production, Congressman Matt Gaetz, has shown, on several occasions, a penchant for openly feuding with the Democratic Committee Chairman, Jerry Nadler.

Their puerile but amusing feuds are part of the Hollywood script.

Believe it or not, folks, both the Democratic chairman and the star Republican Congressman from Florida are major Hollywood stars in disguise.

Based solely upon first impressions, the fact no one has bothered to notice the genuine Hollywood identity of Florida’s freshman congressional representative “Matt Gaetz” is surprising.

But those numbered among one’s loyal readers know, the author at Newsspell can always be relied upon.

While watching the video, displayed above, featuring a performance from Florida representative “Matt Gaetz”, take care to notice the nuance, timbre, and tone of the voice.

Does the sound of the voice from Representative Matt Gaetz seem familiar?

If not, it should be.

Shockingly, or, perhaps not, the unvarnished and unmistakable vocal qualities of Gaetz’s host actor have not been altered in post-production.

Nevertheless, “Gaetz” has proved his ability to put on a very entertaining show.

Given Gaetz’s genuine identity, his stellar performance(s) should not come as any surprise, and when the true identity of the Florida congressional representative’s host actor is finally revealed, each of you will no longer wonder why this should be so.

Behind the masked disguise of “Matt Gaetz” is one of Hollywood’s most renowned, award-winning, and both publicly and critically acclaimed actors.

Not only that, folks, but the Democratic impeachment committee chairman, Jerry Nadler, is also a character conversion scheme, a product of Post-Modern Reality Simulation

In the following video clip, you can see Nadler (D-NY) taking a nap on the floor of the congressional committee.

Yes folks, the “Trump” congressional impeachment proceedings are nothing more than a television production.

Meanwhile, the Crown Temple in City of London and their shiftily maneuvering masonic minions have things well-in-hand.


When examining the official biographies of Mathew Louis Gaetz II, there are a number of telltale numerological markers which become readily apparent. The first sign of overt gematria we encounter is the congressman’s officially listed age of 37 which, of course, is equivalent to the 777 joker code of the international intelligence octopus, controlled by the Templar/Jesuit/Masonic triumvirate.

Secondarily, there is the congressman’s official birth date of May 7 (5th month + 7= 12/21/777).

Officially, Gaetz assumed incumbent office on January 3, 2017 (33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry).

Gaetz’s official place of birth is listed as – wait for it, folks – HOLLYWOOD, Florida.

Yes, the biographers assigned to the yeoman tasks of stitching together the narrative mosaics of Post-Modern Reality Simulation derive their perverse amusement from deliberately leaving such conspicuous clues behind.


Gaetz’s official biographers also inform us, he was formally educated at the College of William and Mary. Founded in 1693 by letters patent of King William III and Queen Mary II, William and Mary is the second oldest such institution of university higher learning in the US, behind that of Harvard University.

William and Mary’s current chancellor is, interestingly enough, Robert Gates, the former Secretary of Defense and Director of Central Intelligence. Undoubtedly, Gates’s proximity to the Jesuit controlled company in Langley implies, he knows well the genuine identity lurking behind the character modification scheme currently known to the American general public as, the freshman congressional representative from the state of Florida, “Matt Gaetz”.

Regarding Robert Gates, after his tenure with the CIA, he was named chancellor of Texas A&M. Loyal readers may recall, Texas University was the site of one of the nation’s first mass shooting simulations, back in the 1960’s; a CIA-generated production which starred former NFL star Alex Karras AKA “Charles Whitman” as the murderous culprit. Both the campuses of Texas A&M as well as Texas University, for decades, have represented breeding grounds for prospective CIA agent recruits.

SEE: All along the black magic clock tower

As for Willliam and Mary, not only was it established by letters patent issued by City of London’s Crown Temple, it also served as the educator of many of America’s founding fathers, including Thomas Jefferson, James Monroe, John Tyler, and even Supreme Court Chief Justice John Marshall.

All of these renowned American historical figures were esquires and sworn members of the middle temple of City of London’s Crown Temple.

Located in Williamsburg, Virginia, the history of the college’s establishment is insightfully revelatory, and profoundly germane to the hidden or occult nature of the sovereignty of the United States.


During William and Mary’s inception in 1693, according to Wikipedia, “the college was given a seat in the House of Burgesses and it was determined the college would be supported by tobacco taxes and export duties on firs and animal skins.”

Before delving into the significance of that quote, Wikipedia offers us more examples of gematria coding directly related to William and Mary’s inception during the 17th century.

“The college acquired a 330 acres (1.3km) parcel for a new school, 8 miles (13 km) from Jamestown.” Surely, everyone noticed the ubiquitous presence of the number 33 (high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry) as well as the number 13 which, represents the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families. And, we shouldn’t forget the number 8 (aces and eights/Saturn/mark of the Jesuits).

As for the House of Burgesses, their existence holds a great historical significance, not only as it relates to the establishment of William and Mary but to the inception of the US corporation, and to the true nature of its sovereignty. According to Wikipedia, “from 1642 to 1776, the House of Burgesses was an instrument of gevernment alonside the royally-appointed colonial governor and the upper-house Council of State in the General Assembly.”

The manner in which this ‘instrument of government’ is couched by Wikipedia implies a distinct impression is being purposely formulated. It seems, they wish to establish the impression, the House of Burgesses was left dormant when Virginia Colony declared its independence from the Kingdom of Great Britain.

But this historical conception is misleading.

According to the terms and conditions of 1783’s Treaty of Peace, though King George III granted the American people their independence in 1776, America was still a Crown Temple colony, as it still is to-this-day. In essence, the Treaty of Peace stated the king was the Crown Temple’s arch treasurer, just as Queen Elizabeth II is still the Crown Temple’s arch treasurer today.

This is why, to-this-day, all titles to tenant land ownership are legally granted by the sitting British monarch on behalf of City of London’s Crown Temple, and subject to taxes and liens at the pleasure of the sitting monarch, on behalf of Crown Temple.

The governor of each state (a “state” is legally an estate of Crown Temple, the allodial title holders) is a proxy tax collector working on behalf of Crown Temple and, also by proxy, a chief administrator of Crown Temple admiralty law. The people, as corporations, are subject(s) to Crown Temple and its taxes, liens, and global admiralty system of law.

Historically speaking, the House of Burgesses, in the state of Virginia, was one such proxy legal entity of the Crown Temple, collecting tobacco taxes through the Jamestown corporate entity, a corporate subsidiary of Crown Temple. Still today, the president of the US corporation is merely Crown Temple’s administrative representative, the commander in chief of the District of Columbia’s principality.

This is why, therefore, the impeachment proceedings are inconsequential to the overall interests of the American people, and the American public observes Hollywood actors, like Representative Gaetz, portraying their congressional roles and dutifully reciting their assigned scripts.


When it comes to celebrities and other public figures, the scribes working on behalf of the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families know, the common proletariat love and crave melodrama. Though superficially, Gaetz’s publicly displayed characterization appears as a paragon of moral virtue, it seems his career in public life has not remained immune from suffering controversies.

It is alleged that, in 2008, Gaetz was arrested on charges of driving under the influence while returning home from a nightclub located on the Florida island of Okaloosa. Wikipedia claims, police recorded Gaetz’s vehicle driving 13 mph over the allowed speed limit.

There’s that number, again – 13.

Though he was arrested, it is alleged Gaetz refused to be administered a breathalyzer test.

After much legal wrangling, the charges were, later, allegedly dropped, with the incident, thereafter, expunged from Gaetz’s record.

It is also alleged, between the years of 1999 and 2014, Gaetz received a total of 16 speeding tickets. Loyal readers will, of course, recognize the presence of the number 7 which represents the Zayin derived from the Kabbalah alphabet.

After taking office as Florida representative, Gaetz became embroiled in a controversy involving a resolution written by one of his congressional aides.

Reportedly, the resolution brought before the House Judiciary Committee was found to contain information from a source considered disreputable.

The source of the content was alleged to have been derived – according to Wikipedia and Foreign Policy magazine – from /r/The_Donald, “a pro-Trump subreddit notorious for both its embrace of conspiracy theories and its gleeful offensiveness.”

Foreign Policy magazine is published by Graham Holdings Company, owners of mainstream publications such as Newsweek and the Washington Post. The latter publication, the Washington Post, has always had a cozy relationship with both the CIA and the State Department, and has proved itself a reliable pipeline – or, perhaps it is more accurate to say, sewer pipe – for the dissemination of government propaganda.

Regardless of the alleged validity of such narratives related to the biography of “Matt Gaetz”, it is clear his character’s fabrication, not surprisingly, is being utilized as a weapon of psycholgocial warfare, to discredit both alternative news researchers and to malign the empirical worthiness of their research conclusions which may be perceived to fall beyond those considered accepted mainstream perceptions, or, those which reach beyond the boundaries of what are considered politically correct parameters.

The character persona of “Donald Trump”, after all, was set up as a symbolic totem in dialectical opposition to the social and political agendas of the thirteen families.

“Donald Trump” exists as a forbidden concept, an ideologically oriented trap, designed to readily identify and to easily facilitate social media targeting of those who could be deemed as political dissidents, social undesirables and, or perhaps worse, dreaded “conspiracy theorists”.

Obviously, Wikipedia has made a clear effort to infer, the character fabrication of “Matt Gaetz” was created to serve an identically covert but no less sinister purpose as a weapon of psychological warfare.

Turns out, President Donald Trump’s fake impeachment proceeding isn’t the only production “Matt Gaetz” has starred in.

How ironic, therefore, we should discover Matt Gaetz’s host actor once starred in a movie about a fake nautical disaster.


That’s right folks, there can be no doubt. Ear biometric, facial recognition, and voice analysis prove Academy-Award winning Hollywood actor Leonardo DiCaprio is the host actor hidden behind the fabricated political character scheme of Florida Representative Matt Gaetz.

Leonardo DiCaprio:

Matt Gaetz:

Leonardo DiCaprio:

Matt Gaetz:

Here’s another, though less well-known, Hollywood portrayal from DiCaprio which – considering his host actor’s characterization of “Matt Gaetz” – may nevertheless appear familiar.


The stewards of Post-Modern Reality Simulation must be getting either sloppy or lazy. It appears, the identical host actor who the CIA script writers have cast as “Don Gaetz”, the character scheme fabricated to fill the role of father to the Florida congressional representative, is also portraying the role of Congressional Committee Chairman, Jerry Nadler – Tommy Lee Jones.

Several components of facial geometry between Nadler, Gaetz, and Tommy Lee Jones have proved to match. Most notably, the geometry of the noses, brow ridges, and teeth appear to be identical.

Though it appears various formulations of light shading and even prostethics have been strategically utilized to aid with the concealment of Jerry Nadler’s host actor, ear biometric analysis indicates a match between both Nadler, Don Gaetz, and Tommy Lee Jones .

Amusingly, you may have noticed, there have been several times during the impeachment proceedings, when Chairman Nadler has conferred with someone seated behind him, presumably to remind the character of his assigned script.

Don Gaetz:

Tommy Lee Jones:

Don Gaetz:

Tommy Lee Jones:

Jerry Nadler:

Tommy Lee Jones:

Jerry Nadler:

Tommy Lee Jones:

Jerry Nadler:

Tommy Lee Jones:












87 thoughts on “Is “Congressman Gaetz” a titanic Hollywood Fraud?

    1. What makes the “Gaetz” characterization so convincing is the fact the actor doesn’t feel the need, unlike many of the others participating in this congressional charade, the committee chairman included, to regularly consult his teleprompter to recall his script. Only an actor the caliber of DiCaprio could pull this off with such aplomb. Both voice and facial comparison analysis confirm this hypothesis.

      1. In the past I saw some Heads of state read leaflets, after some stagings, such as that of Andrey Karlov in Ankara in 2016. The whole scene was full of Masonic symbolisms. I must say it was one of the worst and most ridiculous stagings ever.

  1. Confidentially, I have witnessed this staging first hand, right here in my very own neighborhood involving police and first responders. Compartmentalization remains the key element as to how this is successfully executed, and the subsequent accounts in periodicals and newspapers are always coded. In fact, if you read your local newspapers with a cold and objective eye, every facet of every issue is riven with their symbolism and gematria coding.

      1. I viewed the video sample – concerning the Titanic hoax – you provided in your last comment. I don’t happen to believe there was any ship that sank, and the entire story was a complete fabrication promoted by the same banking principals who owned the newspapers. The key figures, in the execution of the hoax, appear to have been both Molly Brown and Smith, the alleged captain of the doomed vessel. The hypothesis, concerning the insurance scam, certainly, appears plausible. Allow me to thank you, for providing a valuable volume of fresh research material – I’m most appreciative.

      2. There was an act passed by the U.S. Congress in 1851 that limits the liability of shipping companies for maritime disasters and mishaps, with the purpose of protecting the shipping industry as it was an integral part of the American economy. It’s still the law today. Basically, this is a legal loophole that allows maritime monopolies to skirt responsibility and place all their problems on the victims or the “government” to handle. That explains why companies like the White Star Line continued operations without any serious problems until the “Great Depression” when it merged with Cunard, its former ‘rival’ in the shipping industry, after events like the fake Titanic disaster, whose aftermath was heavily influenced by the law itself, as you’ll see in a minute.

        “The owner of every vessel mentioned at the beginning of this article invoked the Limitation of Liability Act to defend their interests. Even the owners of the Titanic, which never reached U.S. shores, filed a Petition for Limitation of Liability in New York. Instead of being given time to heal, the survivors of these incidents and the families who lost loved ones were faced with a choice: take legal action now or forever surrender the right to do so.

        When a vessel owner seeks protection under the Limitation of Liability Act, they file a civil lawsuit in Federal District Court. All potential claimants (including anyone injured and surviving family members) are notified. They each receive certified letters informing them that the vessel owner is suing them.

        As a part of a Petition for Limitation of Liability, the vessel owner also claims that the craft was worth a certain amount of money. If the ship sank, the value could be zero. For the Titanic, the value was estimated at less than $100,000: $300 for the 14 remaining lifeboats and $92,000 for the ship’s earnings. Under the Limitation of Liability Act, the owners of the “unsinkable” ship sought to limit claims for damages to this value. For the families of the 1,517 people who were killed and the 711 survivors, this would have equaled just about $41 each.”

      3. I’m not surprised to learn such loopholes would be legally sought out in an effort to remain partitioned from any and all liability. Also, I couldn’t help but notice, the numerological markers: “14 lifeboats”, $41 dollars, both equaling 77. As that video I recently viewed pointed out, the number of 77, within an occult context, is associated with Saint Corona.

  2. And speaking of shipwreck hoaxes, there is a lot of fakery in the Lusitania story. I have found a couple pictures of Lusitania “victims” that look like paintings almost. Wanna see them?

    The lady in the third photo was a *Booth-Jones* and she was *8* years old when she “died” on the Lusitania. The Booths and the Joneses have been involved in several hoaxes for centuries. John Wilkes Booth of the Lincoln assassination hoax and Alex Jones of the InfoWars psyop comes to mind. We all know that the Lusitania event was the catalyst for the United States’ entrance into WWI (and war is a hoax), and we know how these events are faked (the Titanic hoax for example). So we have every reason to suspect that this one was faked, too.

    Even more bizarre is the fact that passengers boarding the Lusitania were warned by Germany of imminent danger to the ship and their lives. Yet we are supposed to believe they ignored the warning and foolishly drowned to their deaths in the Irish Sea despite knowing that half of the world was going to war against each other at this time. Something’s amiss here.

    For more information on the Lusitania psyop, visit:

    What do you think?

    1. I’ve taken some time to examine the images you’ve provided. The first appears to be a complete fabrication, possibly a painting comped with an exposure. The image of the alleged “dead” appear to be early examples of paramedic training dummies. Yes, the entire scenario, involving the Lusitania – similar to that of the Titanic – also appears to have been a complete fabrication, utilizing the power of suggestion to induce fear and trepidation among the proletariat.

      1. I agree. I suspect that it was also a massive insurance scam since many prominent people were allegedly on the Lusitania when it “sank” and many valuable items were supposedly brought with them on that fateful voyage. That’s a lot of money, probably worth billions in today’s currency. I am quite sure many of the first class passengers had life insurance policies and owned stock in insurance companies like the Astors of the Titanic psyop. Whatever happened to the Lusitania? That is yet to be seen, but it is starting to look like a live-action drill with no real victims than a premeditated act of murder, like the fake 9/11 attacks. Perhaps the survivors were the only ones ever on board the ship and once they finished emptying the vessel it was scuttled (intentionally sunk) with no casualties, though it is likely no ship sank at all and the Lusitania wreckage is another hoax. The fictitious loss of lives were added later for the drama of it all and to act as a sales-pitch to conjure-up American support for World War One. Plus, many wealthy Americans on the Cunard liner probably knew the United States was soon going to be embroiled in the international conflict and because of that fact they felt it necessary to disappear from the scene for extended periods of time or until the war was over and they could resurface under new aliases. We shall see.

      2. I agree with the latter scenario you’ve presented. The entire episode was fabricated. Let’s face it, periodicals were the major form of media, and all of those had been monopolized by the families. All they needed was the power of suggestion for the details of the psychological operation to be believed by a majority of the American public: photographic depictions of a ship sailing the seas on the front page(s), lists of simulated victims, and repetitive doses of crude wartime propaganda. Let’s not forget too, this era of time corresponded with the Spanish flu “pandemic”. What if, the real purpose of the “war” was to test the effectiveness of the vaccines on unwitting enlisted servicemen, using news of a world conflict as a grand cover?

      3. Although, too. on second thought, one can never deny the possibility of a vast insurance scam. However, there can be no doubt, the “war”, which immediately followed the Lusitania psychological operation, was far more profitable for the families.

      4. The idea that a hoax world war was a cover for a massive medical experiment on the masses involving vaccines AKA a “flu pandemic” is certainly a plausible idea. WWI, of course, was also a cover for the monopolization of power and resources by the ruling families, as you may know. The League of Nations was also formed after the war, which was an attempt to officiate a one world gov’t. It failed miserably, but it laid the groundwork for the present one world gov’t: the United Nations, formed after WWII decades later.

        I suspect the “Black Plague” from the Middle Ages may have served similar ends as well: to weed out or relocate unwanted populations and to crush or monopolize industries and societies so the ruling “anointed” bloodlines can prosper and expand their control grid. Around the time of the plague, “wars” and “civil unrest” between tribes and kingdoms was happening. There were also “famines” around this time. I suspect all of the above were created or manipulated to inflict chaos and division upon the mass population for the same end goals: to enrich and empower the bloodlines running Europe at the time.

        There were also artificial famines before, during, and even after the “French Revolution” which resulted in staged uprisings and social chaos, all of which paved the way for the rise of a banana republic, a “Corsican” (Jewish) dictator ruling the French empire, a (temporary) restoration of the old order, and more “revolutions,” “wars,” and banana republics. Same with the “Bolshevik Revolution” in Russia (WWI – 1917), but instead of several revolutions and ever-changing regimes, they got eight decades of the USSR/”Iron Curtain” and are now openly run by a corrupt capitalistic oligarchy with “Putin” as their frontman-in-chief after the Cold War ended in the early 1990s. Order out of chaos 101.

        The “wars” and “revolutions” we see throughout history were also covers for something deeper: race wars. Before the Renaissance Era and the “Age of Enlightenment,” the “Old World” was predominantly run by an elite class of melanated (black) nobles and royals (that’s probably where we got the term “Black Nobility” from). But there was an influx of “albino” or fair-skinned people migrating and breeding with the indigenous darker-skinned populations of the European continent. Slowly, once predominant colored ethnicities were phased out and replaced by the incoming albinos who now are the dominant ethnic group in Europe for the time being. After purging and subjugating the original Europeans, the conquerors inaugurated an extensive campaign of historical revisionism and whitewashing of artwork and sculptors once belonging to the vanquished blacks.

        Similar attempts were made in the Americas where the same people tried, with varying degrees of success, to purge and subjugate the indigenous black Americans and whitewash their history. They then promulgated the lie that the real “American Indians” were in fact descendants of or were once slaves from Africa who were trafficked into the “New World” via the Atlantic slave trade. I have shown previously how that story makes no sense on any level. You cannot cram hundreds of people into small wooden ships and transport them from one place to another for two or three months with very little food and water and still manage to keep many of them alive. Almost all of the human “cargo” would have died in those conditions inside those ships by the time the trips were over. The slave trade psyop was created to explain where all the black people came from as well as to incite racial tension between the races.

      5. Here are newspaper frontlines about the Lusitania “disaster”:–newspaper-headlines-headline-news.jpg*6JjCYIwtgpPW-UQL_ntWwA.jpeg

        As you can see, just like in the first reports about the Titanic event, the numbers always change. Had this been a real tragedy, the numbers wouldn’t fluctuate so much, they would be pretty close. Certainly the newspapers would’ve known where the numbers came from and tried their best to cross-examine their sources before publishing the figures if this wasn’t a hoax and if there was no intention to mislead and confuse their readers. But as the evidence shows, that wasn’t the case at all.

        Another story from the Lusitania saga was that of millionaire businessman A. G. Vanderbilt, Sr. He allegedly died on the ship while travelling in first-class on a business trip. During the sinking, he reportedly gave his life jacket to a woman with child despite the fact that he couldn’t swim without one. Rather odd, if you ask me.

        In the same Wiki article, it mentions that his wife and descendants inherited incredible sums of money from his will after his “death”. It appears as though the Vanderbilts made bank off of this scam, as did many notable people involved.

        “After Alfred’s death aboard the Lusitania in 1915, Margaret bought a 316-acre estate in Lenox, Massachusetts, with a 47-room mansion. She remarried twice, first on June 12, 1918, in Lenox Raymond T. Baker (1875–1935), a politician with whom she had a daughter, Gloria Baker (1920–1975). The claim for his estate was put forward Margaret, who by that point was already remarried. The net value of the estate, after the payment of all debts and funeral and administration expenses, was $15,594,836.32.

        By the terms of his will, Margaret and his three sons would inherit $1,180,098.18. In addition, for their maintenance and for the support and comfort of his widow and children, he expended and contributed approximately $300,000 annually.”

        In today’s currency, the $1.1M inheritance (1915) would translate into $30M, annual inflation adjusted.

      6. Yes, that’s an insightful point. Undoubtedly, the specifics of these “events” – regarding fundamental statistics as well as narrative details – always appear to alter, particularly over the span of time. Also, some of the pictures of the vessel on the front pages of these periodicals don’t seem to match. Regarding Magaret Vanderbilt’s mansion, surely you noticed, the number of rooms appears symbolic of Euclid’s 47th problem, which stands as a telltale sign of the involvement of the masonic order.

      7. Indeed, the clues are everywhere in the storyline as are the discrepancies. As for the fact that the photos of the Lusitania look different, that can be easily explained with the fact that the owners of the ship made alterations on it overtime. Prior to 1912, the Lusitania only carried 16 lifeboats, as was required by the U.K. Board of Trade since 1894. After the Titanic hoax, the Board of Trade changed its maritime safety regulations and additional lifeboats were added on the ship. Before the First World War, the Lusitania’s four funnels were painted red and black, the color scheme for all Cunard liners in commercial service at the time. When the Lusitania entered service as a semi-warship during WWI, the funnels were repainted black to camouflage the vessel.

        It is also likely that the pictures are showing different, but virtually identical, ships. It is said that the Lusitania had a twin sister-ship, the Mauritania. Perhaps some of the photos show her but are misattributed as the Lusitania to cause confusion.

      8. I’m sure you also noticed that they claim the Lusitania was torpedoed at 2:33 pm near the Irish coast and sank in 18 mins. The numerology alone blows this case as a Masonic hoax.

      9. Even the Lusitania’s design is full of symbolism. For example, her draught (vertical distance between the waterline and the bottom of the hull) was 33 ft. 7 in., her length was 787 ft., and her displacement was 44,000 tons.

      10. Vanderbilt was also a Skull & Bonesman. That alone pegs him as a “spook” of the highest order. And let’s not forget this is the family that gave us “Anderson Cooper”, tying him directly to the Lusitania hoax.

        Further research shows that Skull & Bones also enjoys ties to the medical industrial complex AKA “modern medicine”. Many of its members were involved in the tobacco industry and controlled the movements opposing the business. That explains why “anti-smoking” laws have such a widespread impact on public health. This can be tied to the Vanderbilts via the Whitney dynasty. One of Alfred Vanderbilt’s in-laws was a Whitney.

      11. Absolutely, Skull and Bones are filled with agents connected to CIA. As for Cooper, I’ve no doubt of his family’s connections to such a hoaxed event. His family is a nest of snakes and he’s nothing more than an actor, and a well-trained professional liar. I’ve got an expose on “Bill Clinton” coming up. But, before then, I will prove “Tupac Shakur” is still alive, and he’s been right in front of our faces the entire time.

      12. Upon reconsidering your suggestion that the Lusitania was a phantom liner, I am now open to that possibility. The Lusitania is said to have had a twin sister ship called the Mauritania. Were they played by one vessel and the photos of them together are forgeries?



        Here is a photo of the two Cunard liners together in 1911. It’s likely one of them was pasted into the photograph, perhaps the ship to your right.

        The Mauritania would outlive her older sister ship, only to be scrapped alongside the Olympic in the 1930s during the Great Depression. Perhaps that’s what really happened to the Lusitania?

      13. Though I have yet to fully examine the images in any great detail, I’ve arrived at the hypothesis that photo-shop technology has existed long before it was ever commercialized for the retail market. I noticed, while examining the images of Adolf Hitler (AKA Bing Crosby/Leopold III) that many of the same photo shop techniques – though much cruder and more elementary than what can be done presently – had been used to alter and rake the images. This seemed to be the case with many of the images taken from the same time period. According to the BBC radio 4 program I mentioned previously, the technology of photography was made available to the British royals long before cameras appeared in retail markets. Though this may, too, sound implausible, I also believe the doomed ship known to history as the Titanic may never have existed either.

      14. “Though this may, too, sound implausible, I also believe the doomed ship known to history as the Titanic may never have existed either.”

        It’s actually a very plausible idea. I have been pondering about that theory for quite some time. I suspect that the Titanic was actually the alter ego of the Olympic, her older sister ship – meaning one vessel played two ships.

        That may also explain the Olympic-Hawke collision, which “happened” in September 1911 (nines and ones, as usual, like 9/11), months before the Titanic “collided” with an iceberg and “sank”. Perhaps they needed the Olympic for the Titanic project and they realized a fake collision would serve as a perfect cover for the Olympic‘s makeover. The story also served as a perfect psyop to prime the public for the upcoming Titanic hoax. With that accomplished, they got busy refurbishing the Olympic as the Titanic for several months: changes in window configurations, changing nameplates, augmenting the interiors a little, etc., etc. Then they sent the “Titanic” to sail on her “maiden voyage” in April 1912 with her (preselected) passengers and crew, staged a live-action boat drill near the coast of Newfoundland, emptied the ship, then sailed the Titanic back to Belfast and reverted her back to the Olympic.

        Here are photos from the 1911 collision. The left picture looks like a paste-up. The right picture looks almost like a painting or heavily drawn over.

        Here is a colored photo of the Olympic (background) and the Titanic (foreground) in Belfast, after the Olympic-Hawke collision. It looks to be another paste-up. It’s very likely the ship in front of the “damaged” Olympic was copied from the ship in the background, resized, repainted, had three of her four funnels removed, windows blacked out, and repasted into the photograph as the Titanic in the early stages of her fitting out.

      15. The scenario you’ve presented is quite plausible, however, consider this: What if, the ruling families, knowing that air travel, in the coming decades, would be the primary mode of overseas transportation, they sought to both fund and execute these psychological operations, in an effort to begin to scare prospective travelers away from ships and dirigibles (Hindenburg hoax) in lieu of passenger airliners?

      16. Keep in mind that the Olympic was making a return trip to the UK from NYC during the Titanic “disaster”, which confirms my suggestion that she was still in operation at the time after the accident with HMS Hawke several months earlier. She was headed by Herbert Haddock, who was initially the captain of the Titanic before E. J. Smith assumed the role. Haddock was also a member of the Order of the Bath (CB) and a chaperon to King George V, so he wasn’t a nobody.

        The Haddock bloodline:

        The Olympic left Southampton for New York a week before the “Titanic” left the same port for the same destination on April 10th. The Titanic was allegedly completing sea trials at the same time. I think it’s likely that the photos we have of the Titanic during her maiden voyage actually show the Olympic disguised as the fictional Titanic on her fictional “first” and “final” voyage. It’s likely the photos weren’t even taken during the Titanic’s maiden voyage to New York. Most likely those were taken well before that. That means the whole “maiden voyage” was fake too, just like the sinking.

        “RMS Titanic left Southampton on April 10, 1912 for her maiden voyage to New York, whilst the Olympic departed New York at 3 PM on April 13. There was considerable excited chatter amongst passengers and crew that the two ships would pass each other at sea. However, as fate would have it on April 14, 1912 at 11.40 PM the Titanic struck the iceberg and commenced to list.”

        There are too many tell-tale signs to make any of this a coincidence. The timing and the circumstances all fit for a single vessel faking two ships, two voyages, and one disaster at the same time.

      17. 3 pm=33, along with a monarch’s chaperone – a member of a masonic order – who was captain prior to Smith. Indeed, not coincidental. The operation was executed before dawn, and under the cloak of morning’s darkness. Typical masonic methods of operation. All they needed were high-degree masonic figures in place and compartmentalized witnesses or “survivors’ who could either have been easily compromised, blackmailed, or sworn by masonic oath to say they were on board a vessel called “Titanic”. This is how these sorcerers weave the spell known as “history”.

      18. Also 11:40 PM, the time of the Titanic’s alleged collision with an iceberg. 11 x 4 = 44, the number of the 44 kings of Israel in the Bible.

        As for the “survivors”, I believe they were nothing more than undercover intelligence operatives and crisis actors (such as silent film actress Dorothy Gibson, who was a first-class passenger on board the ship) who were paid to promote this hoax. After all, there are millions of people who work for worldwide intelligence, so conscripting a few hundred agents to be willing participants in a massive psyop like the Titanic wouldn’t be hard at all for them.

        One such example would be Edith Rosenbaum (AKA Russell), who was one of the high-profile survivors of the fake disaster. She came from a wealthy Jewish family and would later work for military intelligence as a correspondent during WWI.

        Speaking of actors, DYK Dorothy Gibson released the first Titanic movie a month after the “disaster”? I’m not joking! She even wore the nightgown that she wore on the ship in the film, which added an “authentic” touch to the production (LMAO). Since the disaster would still be fresh in her mind, it seems extremely odd that a person who just survived a horrible tragedy would capitalize on it by producing a film about what happened and making money off of it. Conveniently, the B&W silent film is lost because all the known copies were “destroyed” in a fire in March 1914, months before the First World War broke out, according to Wikipedia. Convenient.

        Gibson was one of the first people to leave the Titanic in lifeboat no. 7. Seven, as we all know, is an occult symbol and a hoax code. This hoax is “drowned” in numerology and allegorical references.

      19. A “Survivor” stars in a film a mere one month after the “disaster” – priceless! – and the number of the lifeboat was ‘7’. I sometimes wonder if these people will ever consider they are more transparent than glass? Of course, once such fabricated historical legends are cemented in the public’s consciousness, they can be profited from in perpetuity.

      20. Here’s a review of the “lost” film “Saved From The Titanic” (1912):

      21. Yup. How ridiculous is that? Of course these people are aware that they are telling such transparently absurd lies, but because they know the vast majority of the public will never catch onto their labyrinth of deceptions, they can say anything, no matter how ludicrous, and get away with it. Plus, since no one was harmed, who is going to hold them accountable for propagating these stories? The “victims” aren’t even real, so basically there’s nothing people can do about it (even if they find out) except not believing in the stories without first vetting them for veracity and not allowing themselves to foot the bill for these big hoaxes. The recent example of the Coronavirus, with its own patently ridiculous story, is proof of how hopeless the masses truly are against the lie system. Like I said previously, most people are no different than Stockholm syndrome patients.

      22. Hopeless, yes. All they had to do, right from the beginning of the “pandemic”, to find out the entire exercise was merely a simulation, was to consult with the New England Journal of Medicine to discover that the term coronavirus was defined as the common cold, the human anatomy’s natural process of shedding itself of toxins. I believe, if memory serves, there is a link left to that very journal entry in one of my articles, published last year.

      23. Edith Russell, a Titanic “survivor”, retired her fashion & writing career in 1937 (which began in 1911, 26 years earlier, 2×6 = 12, as in 1912), the year the Hindenburg, “the Titanic of the skies”, was “destroyed”.

        In 1911, she was involved in a car accident while traveling to a horse race in Deauville, France. Her fiancé, Ludwig Loewe, “died” in the crash. Loewe came from a prestigious Jewish family who was involved in weapons manufacturing (this is important since Edith later played a key role in WWI as a news correspondent/propagandist). 1911 was also the year of the Olympic-Hawke “collision”. No coincidence, I am sure.

        She was also a godmother to Peter Lawford and Patricia Kennedy’s children in her later years, indirectly linking her to yet more hoaxes associated with that family such as the JFK “assassination”.

        “Although retired from her work as a fashion buyer in Paris from about 1937, Edith Russell continued traveling extensively.[30] She remained active socially, befriending many celebrities during her stays in the south of France, Majorca, Lucerne and Rome, including the Duke of Windsor, Benito Mussolini and Anna Magnani. In addition, Edith maintained a close friendship with the couturier Jenny and actor Peter Lawford and his wife Patricia Kennedy, who made her a godmother to their children.[31]”

        She also “sued” the White Star Line for the loss of her 19 pieces of luggage (don’t the 19 hijackers of 9/11, another Titanic-style event, ring a bell?) soon after the disaster. Wikipedia says it was “one of the largest claims filed against the shipping company in the aftermath of the disaster.” Ironically, Rosenbaum didn’t insure (?) her luggage before the Titanic “sank” because the ship was “unsinkable”, making the whole case fallacious to say the least.

        The luggage was stored in room 63 (6+3 = 9, number of completion, 9/11. Also the symbol of the Ninth Satanic Cult) on E-deck, four-decks below Rosenbaum’s suite A-11 (eleven, again). E-deck is also where Scotland Road (Scottish Rite Freemasonry?) was located according to the Titanic’s blueprint layout. E looks like a flipped 3. 33, perhaps?

        Here’s some info on her family origins. Apparently, “Rosenbaum” refers to wild roses. Perhaps an esoteric reference to the Rosicrucians? “Rose” is also the name of one of the main characters in the movie Titanic (1997) – Rose DeWitt Bukater (more commonly known as Rose Dawson), played by Kate Winslet. I guess that’s where they got their inspiration for “Rose” from.

      24. It reminds me of some of the photos of Thomas Andrews of the Titanic hoax fame. They all look very weird and spooky, to say the least.

        They all look like paste-ups and/or painted over. What do you think?

        Additional photographs are to be found here in case you’re interested:

      25. These examples which you’ve kindly provided remind me of the images of the alleged 9/11 victims which, without exception, proved to be complete fabrications.

    2. Speaking of vaccines, here’s some information on vaccination during the Spanish Flu “pandemic”:

      In 2015, there was a senate bill passed that mandated multiple vaccinations for veteran soldiers. That may partially explain why there are so many “disabled” veterans. U.S. soldiers have always served as perfect guinea pigs for mass experimentation, of course.

      Before Covid-19, the WHO was spreading fear about the flu influenza of 2009-10. History repeating itself again and again, because the same people are always scripting the stories.

      1. The taxpayers (us) were also grifted of billions of dollars for the production of these vaccines via Big Pharma companies like Novartis during the H1N1 psyop. They made lucrative contracts with the United States corporation for the production and distribution of these inoculations.

        And to add further insult to injury, many of the overpriced drugs people take were also funded with tax dollars through agencies like the NIH and the NHS. Not only that, but Congress refused numerous times to allow drug price negotiations for those on social welfare programs like Medicare and Medicaid, which is very telling considering that they hold lucrative investments in Big Pharma that makes them fabulously wealthy.

        That also includes “public servants” who pretend to fight against medical giants like Pfizer, such as Rep. Joe Kennedy III of the infamous Kennedy bloodline.

        “On the campaign trail, Rep. Joe Kennedy III (D-Mass.) casts himself as a fighter who takes on big pharma. His disclosure shows he’s profited from rising drug prices. Last year, he reported owning up to $2.1 million in stock in pharmaceutical and health products companies in a family trust. Those include industry giants such as Johnson & Johnson, Merck, Abbott Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co and Pfizer.”

        And just like the present Coronavirus scam, as VP, “Joe Biden” also managed the staged crisis, albeit behind the scenes. He also played a role in the Ebola scam, which was a cover for public handouts to vaccine manufacturers.

        “Obama asked Biden, who already served as the administration’s unofficial liaison to the Senate, to meet with congressional leaders to lobby for nearly $9 billion.

        “During the meeting, something came up, someone tapped Obama on his shoulder and he had to leave,” recalled then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.). “Biden wound up running the meeting and making the case for more money. From that point forward, he basically took over on the swine flu deal.””

        “The supplemental funding bill came through, to the tune of nearly $8 billion.”

        On the Ebola response, Politico says thus:

        “Once again, Biden served as a conduit to Congress, helping push through $5.4 billion in emergency funds. This was a tougher task than during H1N1. The House was under Republican control, and much of the Ebola money was heading overseas, to help contain the virus in Africa.”

        In early December 2019, weeks before the start of the Coronavirus “pandemic”, the taxpayer-funded vaccine group GAVI (also one of the doners to the Gates Foundation, btw) pledged almost $180 million to producing the Ebola vaccine for distribution to developing nations, which are “free of charge” to the recipients.

        And just like the Coronavirus vaccines, both the H1N1 and Ebola inoculations come with complications that do cause adverse reactions to some who receive them, although they usually mislead us into believing that they are “rare”, which is actually because they are rarely reported after injections, as one “public health” internal memo admits, not because the severe side effects are actually rare.

        “A sharp increase in the number of narcolepsy diagnoses in children was noticed shortly after immunization campaigns for the pandemic 2009 H1N1 vaccines in Finland and Sweden. Subsequent analysis confirmed an association between the European AS03-adjuvanted pandemic 2009 H1N1 vaccine (PandemrixTM) and narcolepsy onset in several northern European countries. Immunization with this vaccine is thus no longer recommended in children [1-3].”

        “Among the 15,399 adult subjects vaccinated with rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP (the name used for the vaccine pre-licensure) during the clinical development of the vaccine, there were two reports of serious vaccine-related pyrexia and two reports of non-fatal anaphylaxis. …. Vaccination with ERVEBO may not protect all individuals. Its safety and effectiveness have not been assessed in immunocompromised individuals. The vaccine may be less effective in immunocompromised individuals.”

    3. Another aspect of this “tragedy” that completely blows the whole story is the “wreck” of the Lusitania. Like the Titanic “wreck”, much secrecy and uncertainty has surrounded it for a long time. Decades after the “sinking”, the British admiralty reportedly attempted to destroy the alleged Lusitania wreck in order to cover up evidence that it contained explosives inside the bowls of the ship. Unsurprisingly, the wreck is in terrible condition, with its superstructure already collapsing on itself, making it incredibly hard to identify the vessel as the infamous Cunard liner. How convenient.

      “The British government has always been evasive about the presence of munitions on Lusitania. Two cargo manifests were submitted; the second, filed after the ship sailed, indicated there were light munitions on board. Some believe the ship was carrying much more, however, and that the British Navy attempted to destroy the wreck in the 1950s to conceal its military cargo.”

      While doing further digging, a commenter has suggested that perhaps Alfred Vanderbilt, Sr. did not die on the “ill-fated” ship, but reappeared as Vladimir Lenin, the leader of the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution in Russia. Knowing that the Russian Revolution, like its earlier counterpart the French Revolution, was manufactured by the industrialists to destroy the church and the aristocracy in Tsarist Russia, it’s not implausible to believe that one of their own would assume the identity of a fake revolutionary in order to control the opposition there. After all, Lenin himself is said to have quipped, “the best way to control the opposition is to lead it.”

      “A famous multimillionaire “died” on the Lusitania…Alfred Vanderbilt, a few years later Lenin showed up bearing a remarkable resemblance to him…With added goatee…😉”

      Alfred Vanderbilt:

      Vladimir Lenin:

      1. Yes, that quote of Lenin’s describes very accurately the method operation utilized for the execution of psychological warfare. My next article will feature some devastating information – regarding the ingredients of both the AstraZeneca and Pfizer “vaccines”. In fact, as shall be explained, in detail, they are not vaccines at all, but, rather, delivery systems for an operating system code which will activate a persons (human resource) connection to the “Internet of Things.” The ingredient which facilitates this process: “Graphene lipids”, an artificial Nano-tech developed by Imperial College, London and financed by – who else? – the Gates Foundation.

      2. Very interesting. I think you’ll also find my suggestion that Vanderbilt and Lenin were the same person very plausible, too. If it’s proven to be true, that means it has huge implications for the storylines of the “Russian Revolution”, the Lusitania, and WWI.

      3. I’ll start looking into that. The probability Stalin belonged to the Churchill clan, close to the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha – given what has been proved concerning FDR (AKA Randolph Churchill) and Winston (AKA Alistair Crowley) – should not be thoroughly discounted either.

      4. By the way, I wanted to thank you for posting the link to the video concerning Saint Corona. The informational content proved invaluable for another article I have coming up soon.

  3. Speaking of “Matt Gaetz”, his fictitious surname reminds me of Bill Gates. Gaetz, Gates. Similar names. I believe there might be a connection between the two. After all, most famous people are closely related to each other by blood.

    1. You’ve made a very perceptive observation. It seems, the pseudonyms of these character fabrications are often recycled with, in this case, a letter or two altered. As to your second point, that may very well be. By the way, in my next article, I shall attempt to delve into deeper detail as to how split screen projection was utilized in the case of yet another character fabrication – JFK Junior.

      1. What’s particularly humorous, is that some of these trolls – in the past, at any rate – used email addresses, some of which traced right back to someone – a freemason, it turned out – whom is well-connected to the source of the organization running/paying these miscreants – NEMLAC, a private police organization.

  4. I have found some information relating to life insurance claims in the Lusitania saga. They are here:

    There was dispute regarding Germany’s alleged role in the “disaster” and whether or not the German gov’t was liable to pay compensation to the friends and relations of the Lusitania “victims”. Pretty interesting, if you ask me.

    1. Great finds. These are extraordinary documents. If read carefully, it is clear, based on the terms and conditions of the Treaty of Peace – between Germany and the US – this “event” was manufactured as a casus belli. My examination of the other information, available on the site, confirms my suspicions, the ship, known as the “Lusitania”, never existed.

      1. Indeed, it was engineered to be a “casus belli” – that is to provoke chaos and confusion for all parties involved – so as to bring in their ‘order’ out of the manufactured chaos.

        As for the claim that the Lusitania never existed, that is a bit of a stretch, IMO. There seems to be plenty of photographic and video evidence of its existence (including footage of the Lusitania leaving New York on her last voyage in May 1915: – at 5:05, you can see the Lusitania’s nameplate on her starboard bow).

        However, I do agree that the Lusitania “disaster” was a complete fabrication – in reality a live-action boat drill that was turned into an epic wartime tragedy by the establishment media of the time – and most likely the Lusitania herself never even sank, just like the Titanic a few years earlier. She was probably scrapped in some scrapyard in Belfast or refitted into a new ship that served a couple more years until she was of no use – probably in the 1930s during the “Great Depression”. By 1915, the Lusitania was in commercial service for eight years and was not making a lot of money due to WWI. So she had to be rid of.

      2. You may be correct about the latter point – the ship not existing, Though – for the purpose of legitimizing the psychological operation (photo-ops, etc.) – it seems possible, they could have temporarily repainted or refitted the rear of the ship with a new moniker. Also, though you’ve produced verifiable evidence the ship was in service and was not generating a profit, in the official account, there does exist the familiar numerological marker of 8 (aces and eights). At any rate, I think we can both agree, there exists more than sufficient evidence, this was a manufactured historical event.

      3. And keeping in mind the fact that they demanded compensation from Germany for losses, that means it was another taxpayer grift. Not to mention the fact that the U.K. “government” helped fund the building of the Lusitania on behalf of Cunard, so they were screwing people through that angle, too.

        The Titanic itself was also inadvertently a taxpayer scam, or at least that’s my reading of official sources. Until 2017, the British “government” held investments in the Lloyd’s of London. By 2009, their shareholding power increased to 43%, and that followed a £20.3 billion bailout of the institution during the manufactured recession of 2007-08.

        “The government acquired a 43% shareholding in Lloyds in 2009 following a £20.3 billion intervention in the bank. Shares were sold through accelerated bookbuilds (ABBs) in September 2013 and March 2014. ABBs involve selling a large block of shares to institutional investors overnight.”

        There’s more on this public-private partnership scheme in Britain. Apparently, it’s a little more complicated than that.

        Before the British state ceded direct involvement in the market, there was this event in 2012. The Costa Concordia disaster was another bonanza event that upon closer inspection makes no sense, such as the fact that no proper precautions were taken to ensure safety and the crew was poorly trained. The captain of the ship, Francisco Schettino, apparently rose to prominence in the Carnival Corporation, the ship’s owner, despite his lackluster CV, which indicates that his connections rather than his talents propelled him to success. There were allegedly 33 deaths from the event. Lloyd’s bailed the cruising giant to the tune of billions of pounds, which indirectly costed the British taxpayer at the time, as the U.K. still held stocks in the company.

        “The latest estimates suggest the cost of the disaster to insurers will exceed $1 billion, making it to the most expensive marine loss of all time. The most expensive insured marine loss before the Costa Concordia sank was the Exxon Valdez in 1989, which cost insurers about $500 million.”

      4. It’s been noted that the Costa Concordia story has many parallels with the Titanic scam. Heck, they even played “My Heart Will Go On” as it was sinking. And I heard somewhere that some of the people onboard the ship even were related to those from the Titanic event, although I cannot pinpoint that source as of now.

        ‘Titanic theme tune played in onboard restaurant as doomed cruise ship started to keel over’, claim Swiss brothers:

        It seems like as if they rehashed the Titanic hoax with this one. Except the only difference is something did happen, whereas in the Titanic’s case, nothing really happened.

    2. The Rothschilds were also directly connected to the Lusitania and the Titanic. The same family who engineered and greatly profited off of the hoax known as the First World War. Pretty telling, if you ask me.

      1. Martin Rothschild was the also uncle of famous poet Dorothy Parker (nee Rothschild), showing you that family infiltrated and corrupted literature as well, like everything else. She was also on the “Hollywood blacklist” for her “left-wing views”, according to Wiki, but most likely that’s propaganda made to make her look like an ‘outsider’ to the more “conservative” establishment in American show-business and to sell her as an “intellectual liberal progressive” who was championing “human rights” (LOL).

  5. The genealogy of British actress Kate Winslet. Like Leonardo DiCaprio, she is a crypto-Jew. A Abrahams is in her family tree. She’s also a Lidman, a Plumb, a Sims, a Bridges, and a Wells. All in the family.

    Her family crest sports three dolphins. In “Titanic” (1997), dolphins swim with the great ship as Jack makes his epic “I’m the king of the world!” pose. Perhaps it’s a subtle nod to Winslet, who plays Rose in the movie:

    Winslet family crest:

    The dolphin is also an important occult symbol. In the TV series *Spongebob*, dolphins are portrayed as an Illuminati master race. Of course, we all know who was behind that show 😉

    Bikini Bottom is also a reference to a nuke testing site. Mathis has uncovered the nuke hoax many years ago.

    1. You’re correct about the “Titanic” scene with the Dolphins and, as well, its likely connections to occult symbolism, and to the family crest. If one looks closely at the ‘undersea’ footage in the accompanying ‘Titanic’ documentary film – also produced by James Cameron – one can detect the use of CGI and even miniature props. Likely, these scenes were filmed -much like NASA’s ‘spacewalks’ – under the surface of a massive indoor pool using especially prepared props. Also, you’re correct about Oprah, she is Erin Moran, who also portrayed 80’s pop singer Pat Benetar. As for Oprah’s ‘spouse’, “Steadman”, he’s portrayed by Scott Baio. Penny Marshall is the host actor behind the Hollywood persona of “Whoopie Goldberg”.

  6. The Titanic hoax also led to government regulation of radio communications. We have seen similar results from other Titanic-style hoaxes like 9/11 and Sars-CoV-2 (COVID-19). In Europe, for example, Holocaust “denial” (or, more accurately, questioning the veracity of the claim that six milliom Jews were murdered by the Nazis) is a criminal offense that can put your in jail or prison. Censorship has always been one of their top priorities to ensure damage control and to protect themselves from unfettered scrutiny that can potentially do serious damage to their power structure.

    “While the sinking of the Titanic showcased radio’s potential value as a life-saving technology, it also raised questions about the need to control its use. The lack of clear guidelines concerning shipboard wireless equipment and interference from amateur operators had hindered rescue efforts and cost lives.

    Congress, which had previously hesitated to regulate the airwaves, seized upon the disaster to pass the Radio Act of 1912. This law divided the electromagnetic spectrum between amateur, government, and commercial users and mandated that all American operators …. had to be licensed. …”

    “Radio communication (originally known as “wireless telegraphy”) was developed in the late 1890s, but it was initially largely unregulated in the United States. The Wireless Ship Act of 1910 mandated that most passenger ships exiting U.S. ports had to carry radio equipment under the supervision of qualified operators, however individual stations remained unlicensed and unregulated. This led to numerous interference issues, including conflicts between amateur radio operators and the U.S. Navy and commercial companies, with a few amateur radio enthusiasts alleged to have sent fake distress calls and obscene messages to naval radio stations, and to have forged naval commands, sending navy boats on spurious missions.[1]

    The U.S. policy of unrestricted stations differed from most of the rest of the world. The 1906 International Radiotelegraph Convention, held in Berlin, called for countries to license their stations, and although United States representatives had signed this agreement, initially the U.S. Senate did not ratify the treaty. However, the U.S. was told it would not be invited to the next International Radiotelegraph Convention scheduled to be held in London in June 1912 unless it completed ratification, so on April 3, 1912, the U.S. Senate formally accepted the 1906 Convention, and began work on legislation to implement its provisions. The issue gained importance twelve days later due to the sinking of the Titanic,[2] and the new law would also incorporate provisions of the London Convention signed on July 5, 1912, although the United States had not yet ratified the new treaty. The resulting Radio Act of 1912 was signed by President Taft on August 13, 1912, and went into effect December 13, 1912.[3]”

    1. This is another excellent and revealing discovery regarding the Titanic hoax. One supposes, too, the passage of such legislation would have effectively precluded any further investigation into the authenticity of the alleged distress calls sent by the Titanic to any possible rescue ships in the immediate vicinity of the North Seas. Telling also, that the London Convention had such influence over a prospective bill’s passage in the US senate.

      1. Yes, it appears to have also been one of the reasons behind this legislation relating to the Titanic event – to inhibit any further investigation into the authenticity of the radio communications sent by the White Star liner and by other vessels nearby to each other and to neighboring land operators, which could potentially expose the whole project as a sham.

        It also reminds me of the recent actions taken by the same “U.S. gov’t” and other nations around the world to restrict or prohibit third-party/independent missions to the alleged Titanic wrecksite, supposedly done to protect the wreck from looters. More likely they are yet again attempts to cover up the Titanic hoax by prohibiting outsiders from doing further investigation into the area where the wreckage is said to be.

        As for London, it has always controlled America from the very beginning, as we all know so well, so it’s not surprising that it would play such a key role in the issue regarding maritime radio communications in the United States. London is also home to the City of London, which played a huge part in the Titanic insurance hoax. Lloyd’s, after all, insured the Titanic.

      2. Here’s something you may find relevant to this particular topic. Google maps has blurred images of the Gaza strip. This, one could also suppose, has been done so that curious individuals, such as you and I, won’t be able to detect the entire conflict – like the Covid-19 psychological operation – is a complete and utter hoax/media distraction. Simultaneously, NATO and Russian troops are cooperatively performing/staging “exercises” near the Ukrainian border region. Could this be in preparation to hoax WWIII?

      3. Intriguing. It looks like they are planning for something bigger to come – perhaps after all mass hysteria over the Coronahoax subsides. That may explain the recent developments in Ukraine. I find it revealing that Google is blurring birds eye images of the “Gaza strip”. There is no reason for doing so if there was nothing to hide. Wouldn’t they want to show evidence if this regional “conflict” in the Middle East is real?

      4. Regarding the blurred images of Gaza, that maneuver seems suspicious, if not very revealing. By the way, some of the revelatory information published in the next article, coming soon, will feature a link to a site soliciting actors to role play doctors, nurses, and vaccine volunteers in a pathetic effort to promote the Covid-19 hoax propaganda.

  7. And if anyone thought the whole Titanic saga couldn’t get anymore ridiculous, they’d be wrong. Just look at the recent “missing” Titan submersible story, which is obviously staged to resell the Titanic hoax:

    They also admit that the said submersible had no certifications to dive the open ocean, which is further evidence of the fake. Not to mention that it was a flimsy design that clearly couldn’t survive severe water pressure near the bottom of the Atlantic.

    1. Yes – completely laughable. The fact they’re willing to flog long dead horses and tilt at hopelessly broken windmills is testament to how desperate they’ve become.

      1. Desperate they are, indeed. Just like with Lady Di and JFK, they probably became more concerned that more people were catching on to the Titanic insurance hoax, so they invented this story as a way of reselling the scam, not to mention acting as a cover for fake deaths by the submersible’s uber-rich passengers. Apparently, thought that periodically sharing phony Titanic wreck footage and photos weren’t enough to solidarity this myth in the public mind.

        It’s also no coincidence that one of the suspects involved in this story are related to the famous Straus couple, alleged to have died on the Titanic itself. To quote NPR:

        “OceanGate founder and CEO Stockton Rush is married to Wendy Rush, the great-great-granddaughter of Isidor and Ida Straus, who choose to remain onboard the sinking Titanic together so that others could escape to safety in their place.”

        This paragraph from the same article is especially laughable, for it retells the story of the multimillionaire’s heroism in the face of tragedy and death, whereby he’s more concerned about the safety of . Reminds me of the crocodile tear infested stories of Alfred Vanderbilt’s ‘heroism’ in the Lusitania disaster from three years after the Titanic ‘sank’. Cue the violins.

        “”And, my great-grandfather said, ‘No. Until I see that every woman and child on board this ship is in a lifeboat, I will not enter into a lifeboat myself,'” said Kurzman, who grew up hearing the story from his grandmother, the Straus’ oldest daughter Sara.”

        On Ida Straus, hers also enjoy the same farcical treatment of heroic fortitude and loyalty in the face of disaster. To quote:

        “”She basically said, ‘We have lived our whole life together and if you are going to remain on the boat and to die as the boat sinks, I will remain on the boat with you. We will not leave one another after our long and wonderful marriage together,” Kurzman said.”

        Isidor Straus is also famous among some conspiracists for supposedly opposing the passage of the Federal Reserve, for which J.P. Morgan and co. ‘offed’ him and his wife. Of course, none of that is true either, since Mr. Straus actually supported central banking in the U.S. and, like so many others allegedly on board, faked his death.

      2. More than anything, the “official” story of the Titanic is testament to the psychological power of emotionally laden historical narratives. But while everyone has been held in thrall for over a century, very few have bothered to peruse the actual content of the ensuing investigations into the White Star Line. As was found to be the case with the 9/11 report – and as astutely pointed out, in the case of the “death” of Lady Diana, the JFK “assassination” – issued by the U.S. corporate government, the testimonies offered by White Star Line employees are rife with inconsistencies, contradictions, and outright lies which, nevertheless, provide a most revealing vista into the clever but nefarious insurance scam executed by the perpetrators. Meanwhile, all else which everyone has been told is pertinent to this case is merely window dressing to entertain and distract the public who remain blissfully blinded by manufactured drama.

      3. This is particularly true when it concerns the myriad anomalies and contradictions found in eyewitness accounts about how the Titanic sank. Some say the ship broke up while others claim she sank intact. Here are a couple video examples of such anomalous contradictions in text-to-speech form:

        This reminds of the same problems we encounter with survivor testimonies from the Boston Massacre psyop, many of which contradict each other on certain aspects of the story, such as who was responsible or how the tragedy transpired.

      4. Regarding the recent story of the ill-fated submersible, I could not help but notice, it seems some of the details of the MSM narrative have already undergone subtle alterations. They’re also starting to accentuate human interest drama which is always a feature of these MSM psychological operations. Added to that, there’s been more than a smattering of gematria coding and freemasonic symbolism present. Then again, one supposes, they have to keep the population(s) distracted from the lethal side effects of the “Covid” “vaccines” which, as I’m sure you’re aware, have belatedly manifested.

      5. Definitely. They always have to change up their stories overtime to keep up with or make up new trends and to overwrite older narratives that no longer work for them. And, of course, such stories also serve as convenient distractions from more important issues, such as mass vaccinations or government corruption.

        We see the same thing with the Titanic story itself. For instance, prior to the so-called wreck’s “discovery” in 1985, they used to claim that the Titanic suffered a long gaping gash on the starboard side of her hull which caused her to sink relatively rapidly in one piece. Now, they say she suffered small punctures and openings on her starboard hull frame that spans 6 of her 16 ‘watertight’ compartments, which caused her to slowly take in water and sink, only breaking up towards the end of the sinking.

        These storyline alterations alone indicate that we’re looking at contrived fabrications.

      6. I just watched the ridiculous press conference of some Coast Guard officer from Boston. In addition to the asinine statements, I couldn’t help but notice the propensity of these “public officials” to mangle the English language to the point of utter inarticulacy. More generally, it is pertinent to point out that MSM executives are well aware the Titanic narrative harbors such a perverse but irresistible romanticism for a majority of the population. In essence, they know a story like this will mean an instant ratings grabber.

      7. It’s like they don’t even bother to appear remotely believable or understandable anymore. They stupified the masses to oblivion with the engineered destruction of education systems worldwide and the increasing amount of brazen garbage propagated by mainstream outlets, so they’re speaking ‘inarticulately’ in an attempt to placate to their dumbed down audience.

        As to your second point about the masses’ creepily emotional obsession with the Titanic, I think it can be best said that this is one of the reasons why the Titanic is so popular with the general public and why so much content is made about this story while most shipwrecks barely even merit a paragraph or film dedicated about them. It’s why James Cameron’s 1997 blockbuster movie about this story is such a huge commercial success, raking in billions of dollars annually from gullible fans and oblivious viewers buying and selling his merch – with the said movie, of course, including the cheesy romance of its fictional main characters (Jack and Rose) to spice things up a little more.

        Aside from the massive insurance scams that followed the Titanic saga, the incessant amount of media coverage and popular dramatizations made about this single event alone garners billions in annual profits for the ruling families who own shares and hold leading positions in the news media and entertainment industries, which are the same people that profited tremendously from ripping off the insurers of the infamous ocean liner.

      8. Just before you submitted your reply, none other than – guess who? – James Cameron, a high-level masonic initiated employee of Hollwood’s military/entertainment industrial complex, was wheeled out to ostensibly explain this fake “tragedy” donned in a masonic black and white sweater emblazoned with the symbol of the horned bull.

      9. It certainly ain’t a coincidence why his reappearence happened in a timely fashion, at least not in my book. Nor did it happen by chance that he was flaunting his Masonic status for the whole world to see. Just as scripted as the entire story itself.

      10. Yes, the Hollywood director’s appearance and the story being promoted are both obvious contrivances. It also seems possible Cameron was taking advantage of an opportunity for self-promotion.

Leave a Reply