Scotland goes Hollywood: ‘Dirty Dancing’ in Dunblane

More than anything, the following examination of the Dunblane primary school massacre of 1996 shall represent an in depth glimpse into the very anatomy of a media hoax. When it comes to such media hoaxes, and especially in the  case of the Dunblane massacre, an examination of all logistical elements greatly aided in one’s complete analysis of just how the blueprint for this crisis simulation scheme may have been formulated. Indeed, Dunblane’s success seems to have served as a blueprint for the manufacture and execution of other simulated crisis events from that time forward.

In many ways – as one shall soon readily observe – Dunblane served as a template for similar media hoaxes that subsequently followed years later. But yet again folks, one has – and quite unexpectedly – discovered the participation of a certain Hollywood actress that during the time period of this particular media event was still very much a recognizable household name hailing from an established show business pedigree.

And believe this folks, in order for the media’s farcical presentation of the Dunblane massacre as an actual crisis event to have been successfully believed, a great deal of ‘dirty dancing’ was required.

The first element that struck one as curious when examining the circumstances and media details surrounding the alleged Dunblane primary school massacre of 1996 was the presence of a masonic lodge. Masonic lodge number 9 is situated at 10 High Street, Dunblane, Perthshire, and has been officially holding meetings since its inception in 1695.

This presence of a masonic lodge in proximity with the geographical locality of seemingly every simulated crisis event seems to represent a ubiquitous component of these mainstream crisis stories that always remains occult and unreported to the general public. Such an omission is consistent with what seems to have occurred at the Boston bombing and Sandy Hook live crisis events.

But, why should the public have suspicions over what appears to be mere coincidence?

On the contrary folks, as in actual life and with the execution of simulated live crisis events, there are no coincidences.

One’s research has determined it is not surprising for the general public to lack suspicions. For, the general public has been conditioned to favorably observe lower echelon degrees of the masonic orders as ostensibly occupied with charitable public functions and meetings demonstrating brotherly solidarity, while the true activities of those at the top of the masonic pyramid escape the notice of those lower degrees belonging to the blue lodge masons. This is the sort of astute segregation and clever segmentation never allowing the general public to immediately concern themselves with suspicions, and in turn allows the success of covert operations, the planning and actual execution of which always remains out of public sight, and shielded by the darkness of utter secrecy.

While at the time of this particular crisis event the mainstream media may have portrayed Dunblane as a mere rustic Scottish hamlet or small city, unknown to most, it was the residence of some prominent individuals in powerful positions of international prestige.

One of those prominent individuals was 1st Baron Lord John Reith, the very first Director-General of the BBC. Another prominent Dunblane resident was George Robertson, former politician and Secretary General of NATO. According to the biography of Reith, he was a British broadcasting executive established the tradition of public service broadcasting (read propaganda) in the United Kingdom. Beginning his professional career first as a general manager in 1922, in five short years, Reith was appointed Director-General of the BBC created under royal charter. From there, Reith’s career would go on to scale lofty heights indeed, becoming not only a member of the royal privy council, but also sworn to the Royal Victorian Order established in 1896 by Queen Victoria, and an esteemed knight of the Most Ancient and Most Noble Order the Thistle, an order of chivalry associated with Scotland founded in 1687 by King James II.

As for Robertson, before being named to the position of NATO Secretary General, and prior to the primary school massacre in Dunblane in 1996, he acted as Scotland’s Shadow Secretary of State. If that title alone doesn’t strike one as ominous enough, folks, the description of what exactly the function of this particular cabinet position represents positively smacks of the sinister. The Shadow Cabinet is a feature of the Westminster system of government, consisting of a senior group of opposition spokespeople, who, under the Leader of the Opposition, form an alternative cabinet to that of the sitting government, and whose members shadow or mirror the positions of each individual member of the cabinet.

What this really means folks, is that although the shadow cabinet is formed to oppose Her Majesty’s government, it shall never dispute the sovereign’s right to the throne and therefore the overall legitimacy of the government. A key point to remember here, is that although the Westminster form of government may have originated with the conventions, practices, and precedents of the Parliament of the United Kingdom forming what is commonly referred to as the Constitution, unlike the codified systems of other countries utilizing the identical Westminster philosophy of governance, the British constitution remains uncodified. Offices such as those of the Prime Minister and that of the cabinet, although playing a significant role in the ongoing practice of government, are merely taken for granted and are not mentioned in the terms and conditions of the constitutional text.

In times of crisis, the obvious weaknesses of these unwritten aspects by those countries practicing the Westminster system become particularly observable. Such was the case during the constitutional crisis that sprang up in Australia when in 1975, Sir John Kerr – it is rumored by some at the secret behest of Her Majesty the British Queen Elizabeth II – dismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam, summarily replacing him with opposition leader Malcom Fraser.

Could it be the high political and social contacts of these two Dunblane residents were instrumental in helping to perhaps create the necessary crisis conditions in order to seek advantage from these very uncodified constitutional weaknesses? Could it be, in exerting efforts to execute a large scale psychological operation, the inherent constitutional weaknesses of the British Westminster system were deliberately exploited? Could it be this exploitation was carried out with the implicit knowledge the conditions of perceived public crisis brought to bear subsequent to the Dunblane massacre, would allow for greater facilitation in bringing to passage the sought after gun legislation?

And there is an additional consideration – could the successful execution of the Dunblane psychological operation served to have significantly advanced the professional political careers of both Reith and Robertson, perhaps even leading to the latter’s appointment as NATO Secretary General?

Also noteworthy is the fact Dunblane’s Queen Victoria co-educational boarding school for children of those in the British Armed Forces, is managed and funded by the Ministry of Defense. Additionally, the entire north side of Dunblane is dominated by the Hydro Hotel, currently owned by the Hilton Group. The Hilton Group, according to, are heavily invested by largely the same stockholders as those of MGM Resorts in Las Vegas, a location which most recently featured prominently in a simulated crisis event heralded by the American mainstream media.

Coincidence? Not a chance folks.

But perhaps just as significantly, what strikes one as perhaps even more astonishing, is the seemingly motiveless nature of the act committed by a mad lone gunman. A lack of motive seems to be a recurring feature of these mainstream crisis events, suspiciously lending credence as to the idea of their manufactured nature.

“The official Dunblane mainstream news narrative”

Mainstream news sources allege the massacre of 16 primary school children and their teacher were ruthlessly executed in less than three minutes at Dunblane, near Stirling, Stirlingshire, Scotland by lone gunman Thomas Hamilton reportedly carrying 4 (Kabbalah door of perception) handguns on the 13th of March 1996 (March the 3rd month)=313(7)/1996=25, or 2+5=7+16(#of victims)=1+6=7(777)=intelligence joker code).

The Dunblane massacre is also alleged to have been, and still remains, the deadliest mass shooting in British history.  In retrospect, the mainstream narrative concerning Dunblane seems suspiciously similar to Sandy Hook and other American mass shooting crisis events, centered around the hot button issue of the immediate need for enacting additional gun control legislation, and the necessity for public petitions calling for a ban on the private ownership of handguns.

What better psychological impetus than the murder of innocent children to first rivet the public’s mass attention, then secondarily – through further emotional inducement on the part of public officials – compel the masses to fall for the trap of not only surrendering the last deterrent at their disposal against tyrannical government, but to become susceptible to the cynically motivated emotional gambit and manipulation of a government sponsored psychological operation.

Utilizing the traumatic and emotional bait of the murder of innocent children, the wider general public then feels favorably compelled (or spelled) in allowing public officials on their behalf to curb, surrender, or even sacrifice certain individual and inherent rights for the good of the collective and the safety of the community at large.

Striking while the emotional iron was hottest, the British government and local Dunblane officials achieved exactly what they sought in the wake of the alleged massacre, quickly enacting a pair of new firearms acts, which to no surprise, greatly restricted public access to and ownership of firearms.

Of course, before that eventuality could be realized, and to further bolster the deceptively weak legal position of pubic officials in the eyes of the general masses, the Cullen Report was hastily issued forth (like the Patriot Act enacted in the wake of 9/11 and most likely composed beforehand) recommending tighter controls on handgun ownership. The report also dealt with the issue of tighter school security measures, and the vetting of individuals seeking to work within the school environment with children under the age of eighteen.

However, in light of the fact the high masonic orders always love to carry out their concocted political dialectics before achieving a desired legal and political synthesis, the Home Affairs Select Committee (the masons love the theater of blue ribbon panels), though in agreement the need for tighter controls on gun ownership may have been necessary, determined an outright public ban was not. No doubt, the purpose of this committee was impaneled only for the purposes of appearances – to demonstrate that democratic principles were not being deliberately trampled. But, democracy is merely an ideological mask worn by those public officials sworn to the high masonic orders and occupying decision making political positions ultimately controlled by the ruling elite Jesuit families.

The ruling elites know incremental change appears more palatable to the passively minded public than the government simply stamping down their boot. Emotionally inducing the public into voluntary surrender of its inherent rights and privileges appears more democratic, and is almost always rather more efficient and profitable in the long run than risking legal difficulties and public outcry in simply force feeding immediate draconian measures.

This is the true nature of such mass manipulative psychological operations – get the public to first believe, and then they can be deceived.

More curious still,  however, were reports of complaints lodged and recorded in documents –  availed only after the fact – concerning alleged lone gunman Thomas Hamilton, who it is claimed while serving as Dunblane summer camp scoutmaster had been found to be in violation of charges of assault, obstructing police and contravention of the Children and Young Persons Act of 1937. Such availed reports always cement in the minds of the public the inherent guilt of the alleged suspect, who conveniently, in the case of the alleged Dunblane massacre, chose to commit suicide. In terms of the execution of large scale psychological operations, such suicidal denouements on the one hand spare the need for a trial, and on the other, facilitate not only the psychological effects of mass public closure, but hasten the necessity for greater speed of whatever prefabricated legislation requires immediate passage.

PPP (Private/Pubic Partnerships)

In the wake of the Dunblane massacre, not only were restrictive laws regarding private gun ownership enacted, but public officials, arguing for greater security in the schools, moved to make PPP deals, or business agreements between the private and public sector. Although the public may have only become recently aware of the growing prevalence of these sorts of deals between public officials and private companies, perhaps the greatest example of PPP would be the predominant existence of the Federal Reserve bank in America since 1913.

Although the argument in support of privatization of public services often stresses that delivery of such public services can and will become more efficient through private distribution, the true essence of most PPP deals isn’t reflective of this common misconception. In truth, most PPP deals have been nothing more than rackets that support corrupt forms of vast political patronage, and covertly represent transparent efforts on the part of federal governments to masquerade expanding intrusiveness into the lives of the individual.

An article published by the UK Daily Record in 2013 perhaps best illustrated the debt slavery future generations of Dunblane residents have now been saddled with at the hands of a PPP agreement made by their public officials shortly in the wake of the primary school crisis event. Perhaps this was the chief impetus all along, to manufacture a crisis simulation that would nonetheless have an actual and preferred psychological effect on Dunblane residents, such that they would feel compelled to readily ascent to public officials and their prefabricated solution in addressing school security concerns going forward.

According to a statement made by SNP councilor Steven Patterson in 2013, Dunblane residents are on the hook for 425 million for Stirling’s new schools and new protective security measures. And in condemning the ‘debt legacy’ of the then Labour administration, Patterson added that although the PPP school estate had a capital value of 83 million, the estimated cost to the taxpayer going forward would be an astronomical 424 million, with the debt being paid up until 2041.

But debt slavery to their global financial pyramid scheme has and always will be the paramount end game of the ruling elite Jesuit families.

One wonders, if presently there exist any residents in Dunblane pondering the enormity of the psychological ruse precipitating their perilous fall into such a cosmically enormous financial quagmire. Not to sound overly pessimistic folks, but one imagines future residents of Dunblane will dutifully enslave themselves into penury without ever once contemplating they have been played for suckers. Though not prone to making gambling wagers, one would certainly be willing to place most favorable odds the public officials in whom the residents of Dunblane have entrusted their best interests shall avoid the great folly of ever daring to inform them.

Dirty Dancing in Dunblane 

Yes folks, one has to admit this was a very clever casting indeed.

Though Jennifer Grey, the renowned American Hollywood actress, 1980’s teen icon and daughter of academy award-wining actor Joel Grey was still not far removed from her stellar roles in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off and Dirty Dancing in 1996, those in the British Isles, and everywhere else, failed to recognize her cast in the role of grieving Dunblane parent.

Surprisingly, Jennifer’s voice was not hidden with voice synthesis in post-production.

It is probable however, given their esteem for Grey’s abilities, the directors of the Dunblane production thought her more than passable mimicking of a Scottish dialect would keep her identity secret and seal the deal.

Oh, and the Teddy Bear was a nice touch, huh folks?





2 thoughts on “Scotland goes Hollywood: ‘Dirty Dancing’ in Dunblane

Leave a Reply