What would be the odds placed on a pair of figures from the same British royal family – with their identities thinly veiled by pseudonyms, of course – becoming witnesses to U.S. presidential “assassinations” separated by over six decades of history? Though one should think the odds would be pretty long, if not impossible to calculate, nevertheless, such has been discovered to be quite the case. Then again, in the realm of Post-Modern Reality Simulation, all manner of fantastic scenarios can be made to appear plausible. “Jean Hill”, purported by the MSM to be a resident of Dallas, Texas, claimed to have witnessed the “assassination” of John F. Kennedy in Dealy Plaza on November 22, 1963. Almost sixty years later, on July 13, 2024, “Greg Smith” claimed to have witnessed the “attempted assassination” of former U.S. president Donald Trump.
SEE: JFK Hoax Executed by Wizards of Oz
Trumping the MSM’s Assassination Lies
While both “assassinations” proved to have been staged hoaxes, psychological operations respectively planned, managed by alphabet-lettered agencies CIA, FBI with the complicity of both the MSM, U.S. corporate government, so too, both key “assassination” witnesses – “Jean Hill”, “Greg Smith” – have been identified as live-action role-playing actors, members of the British royal family cast in high-profile roles, whose public testimonies as key witnesses to the events they both claimed to have observed first-hand proved to subsequently help formulate prevailing public narratives, the implications of which hold great historical import, consequence.
Below from L to R: Jean Hill, JFK assassination witness, Greg Smith, Trump assassination witness
It would appear then; it turns out that this peculiar occupation – presidential assassination witness – seems to run in the family, so to speak. After all, devious perpetrators of grand media hoaxes are always in need of reliable witnesses whose testimonies would appear credible, perhaps even beyond reproach. But as everyone shall soon observe, such occurrences are not a matter of happenstance, coincidence or chance.
LADY IN RED
Norma Jean Lollis Hill was a key witness to the JFK “assassination” who later testified before the Warren Commision. As detailed, explained in several previous articles published on this site, the Warren Commission was a staged sham charged with solidifying in the public’s mind that “Lee Harvey Oswald” operated as a “lone assassin”. But not only did the “assassination” prove to have been a well-staged psychological operation, as well, the principal figures in what developed into one of American history’s most colossally dramatic stage plays also proved to be actors cast in roles with their genuine identities hidden behind pseudonyms.
SEE: Anatomy of a Hollywood Death Hoax II
Therefore, it should surprise no one to discover that “Jean Hill”, alleged to have been a key witness to JFK’s “assassination”, was also a media-generated fabrication uniquely positioned to lend credible testimony in helping transform the public’s perception into believing an elaborately staged, contrived, CIA-directed Hollywood production involving the culpability of the U.S. corporate government was a valid, spontaneously inspired historical event. Hill appeared in the famous Zapruder film donned in a long red raincoat, a wardrobe choice which subsequently led to her being dubbed the ‘Lady in Red’.
Given this, is there anyone who finds it to be a matter of coincidence that, yet another Trump “assassination” witness is shown not only to be wearing a T-shirt adorned in the color of red but a red colored bracelet in the following screen shot?
No – certainly not.
The “Lady in Red” is imbued with occult significance.
According to spiritualnexus.net, the ‘Lady in Red’ symbolically represents the divine feminine essence, or Isis, the yin archetype balancing the masculine yang.
The website at spiritualnexus.net also informs that “the scarlet woman calls us to unleash our desires, act on our impulses, embrace sacred sexuality and unlock greater aliveness.”
Populations living only to satisfy their sensual, material desires – a preferred scenario when considering the maintenance of governing hegemony – are much easier to manipulate, control, and to govern.
The color of scarlet or red is also synonymous with Mars, the ancient Roman god of war.
As explained in another previously published article – Kennedy’s Chappaquiddick Drowned in Lies – the idea of the divine feminine or Isis derived from ancient Egypt, Greece, and Rome and developed into a pagan religious system centered around a mystical, archetypical mother goddess whose magic held the capability to cheat fate and death. Later, after the commencement of Roman Emperor Constantine’s Council of Nicaea in 325, the symbolism of Isis or the divine feminine was transformed into the idea of the Virgin Mother Mary which became an archetypical foundation for the development of the universal religious system which is known today as Roman Catholicism. In addition, the divine feminine or Isis, also known as Semiramis, is symbolically represented in the form of the Statue of Liberty erected in New York City’s harbor. The surname of ‘Hill’ is also an occult reference to the ancient seven hills of Rome, upon which the Roman Empire was founded and, more specifically, to Rome’s Capitoline Hill, the location of Vatican City (AKA Holy See or Swiss banking consortium) controlled by the Jesuit’s Society of Jesus. Accordingly, in relation to the plight of Jean Hill who was alleged to have been coerced by the Warren Commission to alter her “assassination” testimony, Wikipedia mentions that Victoria Emma Pagan, a professor of classics at University of Florida, compared Hill to Hispala Faecenia, a freedwoman and rich courtesan from ancient Rome involved in giving testimony that helped put a stop to the Bacchanalian scandal of 186 BCE, stating that “each had knowledge of a vast conspiracy, threatened with physical harm if they did not support the official versions, and were ‘deemed unreliable by authorities by virtue of their low social status’.” The name ‘Norma Jean’ is also synonymous with that of the Hollywood actress Norma Jean Mortenson AKA Marilyn Monroe, identified as a fabricated character modification of Jaclyn Kennedy Onassis (AKA Shirley Temple Black/Judy Garland).
SEE: Over the Rainbow & Back in Black
IBM & CIA
Wikipedia reports that the man alleged to have been Jean Hill’s husband, Bill, was an employee of Science Research Associates, a Chicago-based publisher of educational materials and reading comprehension products which, in 1964, the same year the Hill’s divorce was finalized, was bought out by IBM. Beginning in 1965, converging with the U.S. corporate government’s passage of the ESEA (Elementary and Secondary Education) Act which standardized American public-school curricula and federalized bureaucratic oversight of elementary and secondary school districts under the Department of Education, SRA’s production line of secondary school products sharply increased.
“Among the new products was the National Educational Development tests,” reports Wikipedia, “a series of standardized tests sold to schools as a method of testing student’s likelihood of qualifying for tertiary education.”
Later, during the 1980’s, SRA produced IBM PC and Apple II software. Yes, even then the path to remote learning systems intended for American public-school students controlled by artificial intelligence had begun to be paved and has now become a fait accompli. Surely, the chronicling of these events entailing standardization of the American public school system under centralized control represented but the first steps towards psychologically conditioning, transforming successive generations of impressionable American elementary and high school students into passive, docile taxpaying workers who, throughout their lives, would remain unquestioningly obedient to the authority of the State.
According to medium.com, IBM has had a long-standing relationship with the American intelligence community and CIA. “The CIA has a long history of placing NOC’s (non-official cover personnel) at IBM,” confirms medium.com, “and among other American corporations operating outside the U.S.”
PROBLEMATIC EYEWITNESS TESTIMONY
One particular aspect of Hill’s eyewitness testimony, as heard in the video excerpt posted immediately below, contrasts sharply with JFK’s “assassination” as depicted in the Zapruder film which wasn’t released to the public until more than a decade later.
“The president and Mrs. Kennedy were in the backseat,” Hill claims in the video, “{they} had a little dog between them looking at it.”
There’s only one problem with Hill’s initial statement to the MSM: There was no dog observed in the Zapruder film positioned between the president and the first lady. According to Wikipedia, “At Zapruder frame 313, where Kennedy was shot in the head, Hill was only 21 feet away, leftward, and slightly behind him {Kennedy}.”
Surely, everyone noticed Wikipedia’s account in relation to “Jean Hill” contains not only the number of 21 which also equals 3 7’s or 777, Alistair Crowley’s Kabbalah Joker intelligence code, but that the word ‘leftward’ is a sly reference to the occult left-hand path, associated with breaking societal taboos, practicing magic, and worshipping dark forces.
Keep in mind that in the context of intelligence-directed, MSM-promoted psychological operations, the practice of magic has nothing to do with any dark supernatural interventions, but rather has more to do with the manipulation, conditioning of a population’s perceptions, mass behaviors, and also their pacification and ultimate control through calculated utilizations of weaponized mass media. To that end, this was the purpose, objective of placing “Jean Hill” in Dealy Plaza as a ‘witness’, so that her subsequent testimonies would influence the widespread distribution of narratives which could be construed as conspiratorial in nature, narratives which could be then refuted by those in positions of authority such as the Dallas police, Dallas County Sheriff’s office, and CIA-controlled Warren Commission.
“In her Warren Commission testimony,” Wikipedia reports, “she {Hill} stated that a Secret Service agent told her right after the attack that another Secret Service agent, watching from the courthouse, saw a bullet strike ‘right at my feet’ and kick up debris. Hill was also one of several witnesses who stated that at the end of the assassination they saw smoke lingering near the grassy knoll picket fence corner.”
When considered in the context of intelligence-directed exercise simulations, Wikipedia is essentially admitting – as was the case with the most recent Trump “assassination” – that Secret Service is nothing more than a troupe of actors charged with performing scripted roles in support of legitimizing a preplanned media narrative.
Hill claimed to have also seen a man who she later identified as resembling Jack Ruby – identified as yet another media-generated fabrication – running westward away from the Book Depository building in the direction of the railroad tracks behind the grassy knoll. Though Hill’s testimonies were not confirmed by either the Dallas police or the Dallas County Sheriff’s office, throughout the ensuing years, they nevertheless founded the basis for numerous books, movies, and television documentaries, profit making vehicles which, though largely embellishing the MSM’s official historical narrative with conspiratorial musings, nonetheless ironically served the purpose of not only validating the JFK “assassination”, but in misdirecting a majority of the American public away from ever considering that the entire scenario was a grand, elaborately planned theatrical hoax to serve the ulterior objectives of a Jesuit/CIA-directed psychological operation.
As alluded to in previous articles, thorough examination of the Zapruder film demonstrates it to have been shot in successive takes and spliced together using what is termed in Hollywood and television production parlance as ‘B roll’ footage. Jean Hill’s testimony concerning a dog placed between the slain president and the first lady implies as much and actually exists as a clue concerning the true nature of the famous Zapruder film and how it was produced. The presence of such an animal may have been part of the “assassination” script and, though included in the shot of one of the first of many successive takes of the “assassination” in Dallas’s Dealy Plaza, such a scene was probably removed in post-production and left on the Zapruder film’s cutting room floor, omitted from the final cut which was finally presented to the public and American television audiences more than a decade after the fact. By then, of course, everyone amongst the American population had forgotten the contradictory nature, details of Jean Hill’s initial testimony given to the MSM.
Detailed audio analysis of Hill’s voice revealed some interesting if not telltale results.
If one listens closely to Hill’s audio featured in the opening seconds of the following video excerpt, her Texas accent appears to be an exaggerated affectation, and if listened to more closely still, on certain syllables, though “Jean Hill” attempts mightily to conceal it, it is possible to detect a subtle but distinct accent common to the British upper classes.
According to Wikipedia, “Jean Hill” also became a consultant for Oliver Stone’s 1991 film JFK. Ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analysis demonstrate that “Oliver Stone” is a fabricated character scheme portrayed by Hollywood executive Barry Diller, a serial perpetrator of Post-Modern Reality Simulation. In 1965, Diller was employed by ABC and promoted to Vice President of Television Programming Development. While serving in this capacity, Diller pioneered the concept of the ABC’s Movie of the Week, made-for-television movies presented as a regular series of 90-minute films produced exclusively for television. From there, Diller’s career moved onto Paramount Pictures Corporation/CBS, where he produced hit television shows such as Laverne & Shirley. Desilu Productions, an independent television production studio owned by Hollywood actress/comedienne Lucille Ball, fell under the corporate umbrella of Paramount Television/CBS Studios, which meant that the professional careers, mutual business interests, of both Diller and Ball intersected. As detailed in a previous article – A Partridge & the Prince of Darkness – CBS and CIA have a long history of mutual cooperation, collaboration.
Below: Oliver Stone, Barry Diller
JEAN HILL=QUEEN ELIZABETH II (LUCILLE BALL)
Extensive facial recognition and image comparison analysis confirm that “Jean Hill”, alleged JFK “assassination” witness was a media-generated fabricated character scheme portrayed by Queen Elizabeth II (AKA Lucille Ball) of the royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (AKA Windsor/Hanover/Rockefeller/Rothschild). Turns out, the late Queen Ellizabeth II (AKA Jean Hill/Lucille Ball) was more than familiar with Trump “assassination” witness “Greg Smith”.
Below: Jean Hill, Queen Elizabeth II
Below: Lucille Ball, Queen Elizabeth II
MR. SMITH GOES TO BUTLER
In the wake of what was immediately framed by the MSM as an “assassination” attempt on former U.S. president “Donald Trump”, a man identified as “Greg Smith” instantly emerged as the very first “eyewitness” to be interviewed by the MSM. Sporting what appeared to be a fire red Ronald Mcdonald wig, the seemingly oafish “Smith” was somehow readily discovered and interviewed by BBC’s blind reporter Gary O’Donoghue who is apparently the British news network’s chief correspondent in Washington D.C.
The larger question is: Why did the BBC feel the need to dispatch its chief correspondent to a Trump political rally on July 13, rather than the more prestigious and highly visible Republican National Convention which was scheduled a mere two days hence?
The answer: Because BBC, which is dialed in with British intelligence, had been tipped off concerning the execution of a psychological operation involving the cooperative efforts of FBI, Secret Service, operating under the auspices of Homeland Security, which could then be subsequently spun into a headline dominating, ratings grabbing, news story of major proportions.
As confirmed by a piece published at aljazeera.com, from its inception, BBC (AKA MI7) has existed as nothing more than a propaganda mouthpiece for British intelligence, MI5, MI6. The article published at al Jazeera – https://aljazeera.com/opinion/2018/11/23/when-the-bbc-did-fake-news/ – authored by Hamid Dabashi points out that the BBC’s propaganda machine both enabled and facilitated the CIA/MI6 coup of 1953 in Iran involving the ouster of Mohammad Mossadegh. To emphasize this point, Dabashi’s article includes a quote from Josef Goebbels. “There is a way in which the British, despite the narrowness of their political thinking, are ahead of us – they know that news can be a weapon and are experts in its strategy.”
As for the BBC’s O’Donoghue, according to Wikipedia, he was educated at London’s Oxford University where the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations, Britain’s psychological warfare bureau connected with MI5 and Winston Churchill (AKA Alistair Crowley), was founded in 1922 by the Royal Institute of International Affairs. While watching, listening to O’Donoghue’s interview with “Greg Smith”, it is clear that, like “Jean Hill”, Smith is acting as a deliberately well-placed intelligence operative regurgitating talking points designed to establish a prevailing media narrative.
“Greg Smith claimed to have seen a man with a rifle on a rooftop minutes before shots were fired at a Donald Trump rally in Pennsylvania,” reported bbc.com. “Mr. Smith was listening from outside the rally and said he saw the gunman around five minutes into Trump’s speech. Mr. Smith said he tried to alert the authorities for three to four minutes but thought they probably could not see the gunman because of the slope of the roof.”
Surely, everyone noticed the coding evident in the preceding quote from BBC’s article.
“5 minutes” + “three to four minutes”(7) = 12, 21 or 3 7’s, 777, Ailstair Crowley’s Kabbalah Joker intelligence code
Furthermore, Smith’s quotation cited by British intelligence-controlled BBC begs a pertinent question. If the authorities – police, Secret Service – were incapable of observing, spotting the alleged gunman due to the sloped nature of the rooftop, then how is it Smith was keenly able to so readily observe, identify him?
But then bbc.com gives the game away with this quotation from a statement Smith made to BBC’s Gary O’Donoghue: “Why is there not Secret Service on all these roofs here,” he {Smith} asked. “This is not a big place. It’s a security failure, 100% security failure.”
Smith’s latter statement about a “security failure” was scripted to establish a prevailing MSM narrative which would, in turn, be further spun to manipulate the public’s perceptions and to authenticate the “reality” of a theatrically staged simulation, a psychological operation involving the casting of well-placed intelligence assets posing as witnesses, rally attendees.
Which brings us to determining the genuine identity of Trump “assassination attempt” witness “Greg Smith”.
Though facial recognition and image comparison analysis clearly demonstrated several similarities between the respective facial geometries – epidermal shape, proportional structure, of the respective noses, nasal cavities, nasolabial folds, brows, brow ridges, chins, lips, eyes – belonging to both “Greg Smith” and Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex, ear biometric analysis proved to be initially more difficult. As readily observed after close ocular examination, Smith’s appearance has been modified. In addition to the bizarre fire red Ronald McDonald wig, portions of stippling have been strategically applied to Smith’s ear lobes. However, biometric comparison analysis of those respective portions of the inner ear proved to be identical. Audio analysis indicates that Real-Time Expression Transfer for Facial Reenactment was strategically employed for the BBC’s interview, not only to better hide the royal identity of Smith’s live-action role player, but to eliminate the probability – as turned out to be the case with JFK assassination witness “Jean Hill” (AKA Queen Elizabeth II/Lucille Ball) – of anyone among the American general public detecting any discernable traces of an upper-class British accent, thus compromising the identity of the role portraying actor, intelligence asset.
126 thoughts on “Something Royally Wrong with Rally Gunman Witness”