Many seemed to enjoy the anecdotal stories of celebrities serving as spies. Due to considerable reader response, one decided to add a second installment. Hollywood has long worked hand in glove with government agencies, both the FBI and CIA. Unknown to most, CIA and its assorted sub-departments recently had a considerable hand in not only developing scripts for academy award nominated films Zero Dark Thirty and Argo, but also presided over the production of reality television series Top Chef and the cable television drama series Covert Affairs, and even best selling books such as The Devil’s Light. Continue reading “CELEBRITIES SOMETIMES MAKE THE BEST SPIES (Part II)”
Throughout it’s storied history, NASA has made several extravagant claims, many of which have gone unquestioned by media and public alike. NASA justifies it’s continued taxpayer funding predicated on the idea it is performing ground breaking feats of science; astronomy and space travel. But, despite remaining virtually unquestioned, do these extravagant claims bear any resemblance to the truth? Is NASA primarily concerned with the furtherance of scientific knowledge, or is it merely a PR agency for the US government and the Department of Defense? Continue reading “NASA SCAM IS TAXPAYER BLACK HOLE (PART III)”
This next series of blog posts will serve to connect some dots in terms of the world conspiracy, now coming to fruition in the 21st century. Recently, I composed a post, concluding Aldous Huxley’s Brave New Word was not just an imaginative dystopian work of literature. Rather, it represented an elite blueprint for social, religious, and economic global control. In addition, Huxley had not written the book from the remove of a perceptive observer. In fact, he was an insider, belonging to the bloodline of an elite family, privy to the machinations and central purpose of an overall global agenda. Continue reading “UNHOLY TRINITY: SEX, DRUGS, ROCK and ROLL (part I)”
This is a cautionary tale, about the distortion of an entire area of scientific study. This is how, with skillful semantics, the media sorcerers developed a political campaign into a bureaucratic bandwagon. Now, bombarded with daily dosages of propaganda, broadcast through television, newspapers, and magazines, many never think to question the fundamental philosophical and scientific assumptions proffered by those promoting the climate change agenda.
As one shall immediately observe, there is indeed much to question.
Throughout human history, climate has always changed.
Public figures trumpeting the climate change agenda however, want one to believe ‘climate change’ is anthtropogenic. It is now assumed, because of man’s exponential levels of carbon emissions, a climate apocalypse will soon befall the globe. Contrary to this dubious claim, however, is the fact climate change is not driven by human industrial activity and subsequent carbon emissions.
Rather, it is driven by the activities of the sun.
But, within the scientific community, and the public at large, it has become increasingly politically incorrect to suggest anything other than the standardized climate change orthodoxy.
To those most faithful adherents, nothing other than mankind and industrial growth is the culprit for changes in global climate. From any objective standpoint, with regard to the ‘climate change’ agenda, it is clear political perceptions have triumphed over scientific realities.
From even cursory observation, it is clear the climate change movement has transformed from scientific consensus, to political protest movement, and lately, to quasi-religious cult.
According to the accepted climate change dogma, mankind’s industrial revolution is leading the globe into the certain throes of climate disaster.
Thanks to the modern conveniences developed during the industrial era of the early twentieth century, luxuries once only available to the rich, have become abundantly available to almost everyone. Novel technologies, have made life easier and richer. Modern communications and transport, have made the world seem less foreign and distant.
The question remains, have these developments had any significant, if any, impact upon the world’s changing climate?
Turns out, the main tenet upholding the climate change agenda, that humans are the main source of carbon dioxide produced in the atmosphere, is at odds with established scientific data, compiled over a period of several decades. However, if one were to listen to the shrill bleating of climate change zealots, they regard CO2, or carbon dioxide, as an industrial pollutant.
This is a fallacy.
Carbon dioxide is a major building block of life, produced by all living things.
One often hears the zealous mantra, that mankind must ‘reduce it’s carbon footprint’. This, is chiefly predicated on the idea of post-war climate statistics, demonstrating the earths climate has warmed, due to the exponential increase of industrial activity.
In fact, most of the earths temperature rise occurred before 1940, and has precipitously dropped going forward into the 21st century.
Contrary to climate change consensus, mankind’s overall carbon dioxide production levels are minute, comparative to other natural sources. Bacteria, animals and vegetation are responsible for over one-hundred fifty gigatons of annual carbon dioxide production, as opposed to less than six and one half gigatons representing the globes total annual industrial output.
In fact, volcanoes and the earths oceans are responsible for a much larger percentage of carbon dioxide production, than the collective output of the world’s over six billion human population.
Furthermore, global warming is not the result of increased levels of carbon dioxide.
It is quite the opposite.
Increase in carbon dioxide production levels has been shown to be directly proportionate to increase in global temperatures. But, this is the sort of sinister chicanery repeatedly plied by media sorcerers and elite propagandists.
They pervert lies to appear as truth.
While it is true, there is a direct link between carbon dioxide and the earths overall temperature, climate change propaganda has distorted the true nature of that relationship. In other words, science is being distorted to fit a predetermined and prevailing political agenda. The fundamental assumptions of the climate change movement are based on a series of systematic inversions, distortions, and lies by omission.
The international inter-governmental panel on climate change, a non-government organization created under the auspices of the UN, remains notorious for its ‘notable’ consensus, consisting of over twenty-five-hundred scientists. Turns out, a great percentage of this list is padded out by survey experts, magazine reviewers, and climate journalists. In addition, the percentage of legitimate scientists listed is dubious as well. Though not reported by the media, many of these eminent scientists have asked to have their names removed. Some, have even gone so far as to threaten legal action against the panel, when it was discovered their names had not been redacted after repeated requests.
In a letter to the Wall Street Journal, Professor Frederick Seitz, former president of America’s National Academy of Sciences, commented that key members of the IPCC had in fact censored what were construed as negative comments made by some of the contributing scientists.
“This report,” Seitz commented,” is not what it appears to be-it is not the version that was approved by the contributing scientists listed on the title page.”
Seitz’ damaging comments went on to state:
“None of the studies cited show clear evidence that can attribute the observed climate changes to the specific cause of increases of greenhouse gasses. No study to date has positively attributed all or part of the climate change observed to anthropogenic or man made causes.”
Seitz went on to scathingly conclude:
“I have never witnessed a more than disturbing corruption of the peer review process than the events that led to this IPCC report.”
More telling was the committee’s response to Seitz’ missive, stating that although it had chosen to delete any comments by scientists that could have been construed as negative to overall political sensibilities, “there had been no dishonesty or bias in the report,” and that, “uncertainties about the cause of global warming had not been suppressed.”
The committee went on to say:
“The changes had been made,” it stated, “in response to comments made from governments, individual scientists, and non-government organizations.”
Clearly, the climate change agenda is not about science, but politics, quickly being transformed into a dogmatic religion, tailor made for future generations of the 21st century.
Steeped within the milieu of fantastical flight of fancy, Aldous Huxley’s seminal work of dystopian literature ‘Brave New World’ was nonetheless revolutionary. It presented a nightmare future, where humans aren’t so much born, as they are cloned, hatched and then programmed to fit rigid social roles ruled over by a global, corporate governing structure. Within this global societal structure, exists a rigidly maintained social order, spanning predetermined social roles, from the leadership and administrative class of the Alpha’s, down to the mindless drones called Epsilons, who perform repetitive, grunt-like manual labor.
In the world of high brow literature, Huxley was hailed as a visionary. In the realm of speculative geopolitics, the book was held up as a warning, much like President Eisenhower’s farewell address to the American people, in which he warned of guarding against the unwarranted influence, “whether sought or unsought, of a growing military industrial complex.” While it may have seemed Huxley and the former US president were somewhat heroic, in broadcasting warnings of covert dark forces threatening the tranquility of a peaceful and democratically minded society, seemingly no one has entertained the idea these men may have represented not visionaries of literature or politics, but rather monsters in the guise of benevolent seers.
This is the ruling elites method of operation on clear display.
What appears to the public as a guru, or benevolent leader, leading one down the primrose path to individual freedom and liberation, is in actuality, to those adept and armed with the lucidity of critical thinking, a charlatan guiding one along a sorrowful path, towards the barbed wired gates of slavery’s imprisoning gulag.
For, as it turns out, Huxley nor Eisenhower represented social commentators set at arms length, but conspirators, elemental actors deployed to play out their roles on the world stage, at the behest of a well oiled propaganda machine, funded by global banking elites.
If one has perused a good cross section of information available here, one is able to readily connect the dots of a vast movement to control human mass consciousness, a monolithic program molding human behaviors with systematic application of negative and positive stimuli, delivered through avenues of modern media; television, publishing, and Hollywood movies.
This, in combination with standardized public school education, and the rigid dogmatism of the world’s established religious and political ideologies, collectively represent an effective weapon with which to fight a war, fought not on a physical battlefield, but a psychological one. In other words, the world’s masses are trapped in an open air ‘Skinner box’, victims of an ongoing psychological and experimental program, intent on assiduous application of social human conditioning and indoctrination.
In truth, Huxley’s own politics belonged to an ideology known as Fabian socialism. The Fabians were a group of elite British intellectuals who believed that in order to change human consciousness to accept the development of a global governing structure, such acceptance must be incrementally induced over a period of decades or generations, rather than relying on the immediate social rupture of a single violent revolution.
Unknown to many, at the same time Huxley’s ‘visionary’ book was being hailed as a work of fantastical fiction by those in literary circles, Huxley himself, while touring on the American lecture circuit, conceded that the book was in fact, not a flight of fancy, or the product of pure imagination, but a blueprint. During a speech made at Berkeley University, before his death in 1962, Huxley told an enthralled audience that the narrative of the book actually outlined genuine scientific developments that would reshape the world into a scientific dictatorship:
“It seems to me, that the nature of the ultimate revolution with which we are now faced-is precisely this, that we are now in process of developing a whole series of techniques which will enable the ruling oligarchy, which has existed and will presumably always exist, to get people to love their servitude. And this is the ultimate benevolent revolution.”
Although, at first glance, it may seem Huxley was observing these ‘series of techniques’ from a far flung, objective remove, he in fact, was a member of the elite inner circle, quite privy to the technological and social developments of which he was speaking.
Huxley’s family had stood at the forefront of scientific and technological development for several decades going back to the turn of the twentieth century. Huxley’s grandfather, T.H., was known as ‘Darwin’s bulldog’, for his strident defense of the theory of evolution. In fact, the Huxley’s were but one thread of a very deceptive interrelated web of prominent British families, including the Galton’s, Wedgwood’s, and Darwin’s.
These famed and elite British families became obsessed with eugenics, a pseudo-scientific philosophy developed by Francis Galton, a human genetic theory running concurrent with the theory of evolution, predicated on the idea that ‘inferior’ strains of genetic humans must be either eliminated or somehow reprogrammed.
Huxley’s brother Julian, was a founder of the Word Wildlife Fund, and also became president of UNESCO (United Nations educational, scientific, and cultural organization). In the organizations founding document, Julian Huxley writes:
“It is however, essential, that the theory of eugenics be brought entirely within the borders of science. For, as already indicated, in the not too distant future, the problem of improving the average quality of human beings is likely to become urgent and this can only be accomplished by applying the findings of a truly scientific eugenics.”
Preceding Julian’s stewardship of UNESCO was Sir Charles Galton Darwin. In his book, ‘The Next Million Years’, he writes:
We would have to put up with human nature for one million years, or the time it takes for a new species to gain prominence. Unless, we can have an internal revolution. This would come about if means were discovered of deliberately altering human nature itself.”
As a possible solution to what Darwin observed as the common man’s genetic difficulties, Darwin went on to reflect:
“Life in the crowded conditions of cities has many unpleasant features. However, if human nature could be significantly altered, these problems could be overcome, not so much by improving these conditions, but by getting the lower classes to actually liking them.”
Darwin was even more explicit about his desire to bring about a world governing order: “If then, there is ever to be a world government, it will have to coerce a minority-and indeed it may often be a majority-into doing things they don’t want to do.”
Steeped in this Machiavellian milieu, is it surprising Aldous Huxley composed such a stirringly nightmarish vision of a future dystopian existence for mankind?
It is clear, given the tight knit and incestuous family relationships detailed, that Huxley’s visionary tone was merely tongue in cheek, not a warning, but the expression of a covert blueprint, that of a world governance, cloaked in the guise of fantastical literary fiction.
Yes, folks, truth is indeed, stranger than the strangest of fictions.
In comparison to other commentary found on this blog, this can be classified as lighter fare. Nonetheless, the following may change one’s perspective on the traditional image of what constitutes the classic espionage candidate, derived from a steady diet of decades of James Bond films. Unlikely as it may seem, some of the public’s most beloved celebrities have been employed by CIA and large corporations as spies and counter-intelligence agents. Before one scoffs and snickers, consider the possibilities.
To agencies like CIA, celebrities have two distinct advantages over an agent coming off the training ‘farm’ in Langley. One, celebrities, particularly accomplished and veteran actors and actresses, have greater access and plausible deniability with regard to counter-intelligence activities. Two, because they are accomplished at their craft, transitioning to an assumed identity in the service of a counter-intelligence operation is a rather simple matter. Portraying tailored roles with accompanying disguises and assumed identities or aliases, celebrities as counter-intelligence agents can easily get close to any specified target, even while doing so under the hot glare of the public eye. Some of the following names may not seem immediately familiar, and yet during the inception of the OSS (Office of Strategic Services), the precursor organization led by General ‘Wild’ William Donovan that later came to be known as CIA, these celebrities were actively recruited, oftentimes in cooperation with British intelligence, to help out with America’s war effort.
Admittedly, though her name may not be recognizable to latter day generations, Julia Child, during her celebrity heyday, was a huge television star, beloved by millions. Most famous for over three decades as ‘The French Chef’, Child served in several counter-intelligence efforts during the war and post-war periods prior to 1960. Assigned overseas to ‘listening posts’ both in China and Ceylon, Child quickly rose through the ranks of the OSS, and was even credited as a top-notch operator in William Donovan’s private papers.
Reputed to have mob ties, many are still not aware that OSS/CIA, worked closely with many mob bosses during the war and post war periods. One of OSS Director Donovan’s early recruits included pop crooner Frank Sinatra. Sinatra, because he had exclusive access, particularly during the era of the Kennedy administration, often acted as a courier for CIA, carrying valuable information and accompanying other agents on missions around the world.
Best known as the author of the wildly popular “Charlie and the Chocolate Factory”, later adapted for the classic 1970’s cinematic production starring American comedic actor Gene Wilder, Dahl was employed by the British Secret Service during World War II. Dahl was instructed to spy on the lives of influential and powerful American businessmen and figures in positions of high American politics. Dahl’s reputed method of operation was to become sexually involved with the wives of these powerful men. Physically resembling the classic profile of ‘tall, dark and handsome’, by all reports, Dahl was mightily successful. However, when his clandestine activities led him into the arms of American congresswoman Clare Booth Luce, wife of the publisher of Time magazine, Dahl requested to be reassigned. Apparently, Dahl found the congresswoman emotionally needy, and too sexually voracious for his more conservative tastes. Much to Dahl’s dismay, his spymasters at MI6 reportedly rebuffed his repeated requests. In light of this anecdotal information, one can readily observe where Ian Fleming may have derived the idea for modeling the seminal character of James Bond’s 007.
Known for his portrayal in the roles of infamous movie villains, renowned British actor Christopher Lee is less well known in playing the role of real life spy in the service of king and country during the second world war. Signing up for the army as a young recruit, Lee was summarily placed in the intelligence division. Later, quickly rising up the ranks, the celebrated actor was recruited for ultra-secret Special Operations Executive as part of “The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare”. Shortly after the war’s conclusion, Lee was assigned the dangerous task of tracking down Nazi war criminals. Still later, an interesting anecdote arose out of Lee’s villainous role in Peter Jackson’s Lord of the Rings trilogy. When told by Jackson to imagine stabbing someone in the back during the filming of a particularly violent scene, Lee drolly replied, ‘he didn’t have to imagine it’.
Best known for his feats of spectacular, death defying magic, what is lesser known is Houdini served as an allied forces operative during Word War I, in close conjunction with Scotland Yard and the US Secret Service. During his travels to far flung locales in Russia during the nascent Communist revolution, using his magic act as a cover, Houdini’s official assignments would be to secretly collect information on Russian anarchists, for both the US and British governments. In other words, Houdini was what is known in intelligence parlance as a ‘handler’, working closely with Lenin, Trotsky, and other Russian revolutionaries. Turns out, Houdini’s greatest magic trick was escaping detection as a player in the grand conspiratorial scheme of geopolitics. Given that the communist revolution was funded by prominent Wall Street banking families like the Rockefeller’s, Morgans, and Guggenheim’s, and given that the same bankers funded the nascent development of both American and British intelligence agencies, it is a safe bet the elites were doing in Russia what they have always sought to do; namely exploiting new markets with inherent vast pools of natural and human resources, for even greater profits. Using a celebrity such as Houdini to handle other paid operatives no one would suspect of being a spy, one who could travel freely and gain free access where others could not, was certainly a brilliant ploy, in making certain the elite agenda was going to plan.
Could it be the elite bankers are presently using the same method of operation in North Korea, utilizing a celebrity to handle their trained puppet in Kim Jong-un? Recently, there have been mainstream news reports of former NBA star Dennis Rodman traveling to North Korea to meet and dine with the reputed Far Eastern dictator.
Odd though it may seem, could it be, Rodman is being used clandestinely by CIA, or perhaps some other intelligence mechanism, to relate messages, gain information, or perhaps as a middle-man, in some clandestine Western directed intelligence operation or other?
Taking into account the aforementioned information, one may very well conclude in the affirmative.