Sorry to disturb the serenity of the food and fireworks on this hallowed holiday of July 4, but the search for the truth never rests.
For more than almost three centuries now, Americans have believed in a lie so monstrous it can scarcely be believed. The United States is a not a country, but a corporation.
In truth, it would be more accurate to say, the US is still a colony, which in the strictest of legal terms, represents a corporate or (e)state franchise of the Crown, or more specifically, the Crown Temple in London. Kings James I became renown for not only having created the text that is known today in the modern age as the Bible, but he also established the first charter of Virginia in 1606.
This royal charter not only granted America’s first settlers and forefathers the right to colonize land owned by the British crown on the east coast of the North American continent, it also granted Britain’s future monarchs complete sovereignty and dominion over America’s future generations of citizens. The charter also granted the right of Crown agents to levy and collect taxes on behalf of the Crown.
But, here’s where the confusion for most Americans begins.
Though the British Crown may have later renounced the terms and conditions set down in the Virginia charter with the Declaration of Independence and the Treaty of Paris Peace in 1783, those rights and liberties were merely transferred to agents of the Crown Temple bank. Thus, while America may have gained independence from the British monarch, its colonies became (e)states, unlawfully but legally owned by the Crown Temple bank.
A closer examination of America’s signed treaties and charters reveals this shocking truth-that America’s independence is only a false perception, propagated through the ages until the present time.
PARIS TREATY of PEACE (1783)
Nothing significant is ever mentioned in US public school history books concerning the Paris Peace Treaty negotiated soon after the cessation of American revolutionary war hostilities, and for good reason. This is chiefly due to the fact the terms and conditions set down in the treaty supersedes that of the Declaration of Independence so vibrantly celebrated by all Americans on July the fourth. The terms and conditions of the treaty represented a transfer of power, and did not ratify the independence of the American colonies.
One of the most pertinent conditions set down in the Paris Treaty names the sitting British monarch as the ‘Prince’ of the American colonies. Though, one finds the powers invested in that title were indeed renounced in the opening paragraph, such powers, by virtue of the fact the four signatories (Benjamin Franklin, Samuel Adams, John Jay, and David Hartley), were esquires, and therefore agents of the Crown Temple in London, all such powers were thereafter transferred to all subsequent agents of the Crown Temple serving in that capacity.
Therefore, the legal essence of the treaty stands in clear contradiction to the documented claims of US history texts that the American colonies had, in fact, been granted independence. If that be the case, did the American colonies really emerge victorious in the revolutionary war fought against British forces? Why, per the terms and conditions negotiated at Paris in 1783, were the American colonies still contracted to pay ongoing loans, liens, and taxes to legal agents representing the Crown Temple? Would not the colonies have been in a much better negotiating position, having claimed independence, and in fact defeated British forces on the field of pitched battle?

The answers to those questions are surely to be found, when one thoroughly examines the nature of the signatories and comprehends the meaning of the terms and conditions set down in the unlawful, but legal, founding documents of the US corporation. History texts will tell fantastical tales of how the American signatories of the Treaty of Peace signed in Paris happened to had cleverly outmaneuvered their British counterparts. Though this may represent a pleasant fiction for the American people, nothing could be further from the truth. For, it is all the signatories of that treaty, both American and British, who outmaneuvered, and in fact snookered, future generations of patriotic Americans into believing in the fiction they had won ‘independence’.
Upon further examination, what one discovers is a colossal historical misrepresentation and an example of monstrous legal trickery. American history books are also guilty of this semantic deception in teaching generations of public school students that the American colonies had been granted legal independence from the British Crown. Therein, lies the deliberate and semantic deception-between the ‘British Crown’ and Crown Temple’. Though by 1783, America was no longer subject to the British Crown, it was still legally beholden to the Crown Temple.

AMERICANS HAVE BEEN DUPED
The ruling elites of the Crown Temple in London, both bankers and attorneys, are truly masters of legal semantics. No better example of this exists than the legal deceptions one finds in America’s founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution. Americans have been fooled into believing that the legal crown colonies are independent nation states. In truth, they never were, and still are not today. They were, and still are, colonies of the crown temple through letters, patents and charters, and have no legal authority to remain independent from the rule and order of the Crown Temple.
The designation of a legal ‘state’ is the Crown Temple colony.
Through the deception of everyone who swore allegiance to the middle and temple bar of the Crown Temple, the crown bankers and the middle temple attorneys, now rule America as agents of the Crown Temple through all the contracts, the unlawful taxes, and all the contract documents of false equity, established through the debt deceit of the Crown Temple subsidiary Federal Reserve, and all is strictly enforced through completely unlawful, but legal, orders, rules and codes of the Crown Temple.
Has one never noticed, most high level politicians are in fact attorneys, or esquires? It is because they have sworn allegiance, not to the American people, but to the corporation of the US owned and controlled by the Crown Temple in London.
Our so-called Judiciary, and the Supreme Court, is nothing more than a legal pawn of the Crown Temple. This tragic state of affairs only proves that the longer a massive lie is repeated, the greater the likelihood it will sooner than later become perceived as the truth.
For a greater and in depth explanation and description of the Crown Temple, see:
How Crown Temple rules America.
And now, one may return to the food, fireworks, and celebration of America’s ‘independence’.
We like that phrase “masters of legal semantics”. This is what is happening in America.
Yes, thank you for the kind compliment. William Jefferson Clinton, a trained Oxford barrister, was especially skilled in his use of political and legal semantics.
Thought you might like to know i am a Huge Ancient Aleins fan…
Fodder for a future post perhaps.
Wow, cool!
So true
Thanks for your interest in Newsspellcom.org.
No problem! I enjoy your content like I have said before 😁👍🏻