Comparatively, considering the stunning revelations evident in the last installment, the following conclusions may, admittedly, appear to be anticlimactic.
Nevertheless, we are about to discover connections between “Jane Pauley” AKA Belgian Queen Mathilda, and the former CNN news correspondent, “John King”.
One’s loyal readers have undoubtedly surmised, the surname of “King” harbors a clue, as to not only the genuine identity of the host actor behind the mask of the created-for-television news character, but his true genealogical relations with European royalty.
But, there is yet another stunning revelation forthcoming.
One of the Fox news network’s most renowned and popular television news commentators, Anne Coulter, is not only a fabricated character, but her host actor will be shown to have genealogical connections to an ancient Austro-German royal family line that has been well-entrenched in not only Hollywood, but, for decades, has populated executive positions in some of America’s most powerful corporate boardrooms, and has even placed more than one family member into the oval office at America’s most hallowed address on Pennsylvania Avenue in Washington’s District of Columbia.
As the old adage tell us: birds of a feather will flock together.
Though CNN correspondent “John King” may “call out” presidential candiate and former American VP “Joe Biden” for plagarising a position paper from government-funded climate change activists, a misstep such as that – as loyal readers have surely discovered – would be the very least of Joe’s crimes.
Surely, Mister “King” would never dare to reveal to the American general public what the loyal readers at Newsspell have already learned: Biden is a fabricated character portrayed by a host actor belonging to the royal family of Monaco – and considerably more than this – a royal prince, Stefano Casiraghi who, reportedly, perished in a boating accident off the coast of Gibraltar, near the English channel, during the early 1980’s.
The royal Casiraghi family of Monaco has worn many masks, and empirical evidence, drawn from our ongoing investigations, thus far indicates, the Casiraghi family have posed themselves, in America, as both the Bush family and the historically dominant family of merchant bankers, the Rockefellers AKA Levinson.
As for Stefano Casiraghi, he has portrayed a number of popular culture/entertainment figures and a plethora of major roles in the storied history of American political life over a period of decades.
SEE: Did Royals Fund Flat Earth Psychological Operation?
No folks, Mister “King” would never dare to deviate from his scripted broadcast to inform the American public, and the world-at-large, of the real controversy. Collectively, King’s “news” network, the presidential “debates”, the so-called “elections”, and the teleprompter-reading spell casters who deliver such melodramatic drivel disguised as “news”, are merely working components in the scripted execution of a colossal, theatrical farce.
Rest assured too, Mister “King” will never utter a peep concerning the fact both he and “Joe Biden” have something truly sinister in common.
It turns out, Mister “King” and the presidential candidate known as “Joe Biden” are both hiding their genuine identities behind pseudonyms and carefully crafted, Hollywood-styled CGI masks.
A JOB FIT FOR A KING
Alleged to have been born on the 30th of August (11/twin masonic pillars of Boaz and Jachin) in 1963 (3 6’s/666/9+19/sun #/28/2 8’s/88/mark of the Jesuits), John King is CNN’s chief national correspondent and, as it happens – given his genuine identity – there are no coincidences involved when it comes to considering the reasons behind his high-level employment at CNN (communist news network) which, from its inception, has served as a prime propaganda pipeline to both America and to the West, and for the sole benefit of the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families.
King also hosts Insider Politics, yet another politically centered discussion program aired on the network that – at present – has seen its television ratings steadily plummet lower than oblivion’s nether regions. King was also the host of John King USA, a program that – yes folks, you guessed it – was cancelled due to a paucity of television ratings.
One may wonder, therefore, how is it King was hoisted to the position of the network’s chief correspondent?
The answer to that, and other pertinent questions, shall become evident, when we learn just who “John King” really is.
Suffice to say, for the moment, Mister King’s career in the television/print news business seems to have been mysteriously blessed with extraordinarily good fortune.
Progressing with our examination of King’s official biographies, we begin to learn he was not only alleged to have been born in the city of Boston, but to have been a graduate of Boston Latin High School. Boston – as we’ve discovered – became home to the first Grand Masonic lodge established in the original thirteen American colonies, during the latter era of the 18th century.
Boston Latin is a Roman Catholic high school with a rich history. Officially, established on the 23rd (2 3’s/33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry) of April in 1635, Boston Latin School was not only the first public school erected in America, it is also the oldest such institution in the United States. The school’s traditional crest features a depiction of the legend of Romulus and Remus, the mythical twin brothers whose legendary narrative became synonymous with the founding of the ancient city of Rome. Legend has it, the twins were rescued from certain death in the wilderness by a she-wolf, who, while protecting them from further harm, suckled them back to health.
Crest of Boston Latin School:
Both the mythical tale and the she-wolf are symbolic of the city of Rome, the location of the Vatican, which is controlled – and has been for centuries – by the Jesuit order.
For most of its recorded history, Boston Latin School was known as the exclusive educator of the sons of Boston’s “Brahmin” elite.
For anyone unfamiliar with the term “Brahmin”, it exists in reference to members exclusively belonging to Boston’s upper classes, which historically, along with other prominent families of New York and Philadelphia, have also been known as the East Coast establishment.
The genealogy of these migrating families emanated from Britain – many of which were responsible for the social development of America’s traditionally Anglo-centric culture – can be traced back to decedents of the earliest English colonists from the 17th century, and to family lines belonging to the British peerage, European nobility, and even royalty.
These facts alone, offer us an inference as to who CNN’s chief correspondent “John King” truly is.
After allegedly graduating with a Bachelor of Arts and Sciences in the field of journalism from the University of Rhode Island, his official biographies inform us, King found employment with the Associated Press in 1985, and a mere six (6/33) years later, in 1991, King was promoted to chief correspondent, with executive editorial control over the news service’s press coverage of both the 1992 and 1996 US presidential races.
DOES AP FAKE THE NEWS?
The Associated Press (which in English Ordinal gematria sums to 11/twin masonic pillars of Boaz/Jachin) claims to be a not-for-profit news organization and operates – according to Wikipedia – as a “cooperative, unincorporated association.” One of the largest institutional shareholders in Brookfield Property Partners, the managing real estate firm of Associated Press’s headquarters , located in New York City, is the Royal Bank of Canada, whose Institution Number is 003 (three/EE/occult mirrored reflection/33/high-degree Scottish Rite Freemasonry).
According to mainstream sources, including Wikipedia, the “news” collected by Associated Press is routinely published by more than 1300 (13/summit of Templar/Jesuit/Masonic pyramid) newspapers and broadcasters in the US alone.
It also operates 263 (11/twin masonic pillars of Boaz/Jachin) news bureaus in 106 countries (7/Kabbalah Zayin, the psychological hook, mind weapon).
Regarding US presidential “elections”, here’s another sobering fact – drawn from the pages of Wikipedia – to consider regarding the Associated Press:
“The AP has counted the vote in US elections since 1848, including national, state, and local races down to the legislative level in all 50 states, along with key ballot measures. AP collects and verifies returns in every county, parish, city and town across the US, and declares winners in over 5000 contests.”
Consider the implications of the following incident involving Christopher Newton, an AP reporter fired in September of 2002, when it was discovered, he had been fabricating his news stories and his alleged sources:
“Washington D.C. bureau reporter Christopher Newton, an AP reporter since 1994, was fired by AP in September 2002 after he was accused of fabricating sources since 2000, including at least 40 people and organizations.”
The method of operation demonstrated by this story – when also considering the, by now, well-documented phenomenon of Post-Modern Reality Simulation – is to implicate a single perpetrator for such egregious offenses, while the business of news fabrication continues on unabated, unregulated, and utterly unnoticed.
This method of psychological operation, demonstrated in the Wikipedia snippet – in terms of maintaining public perceptions regarding the mainstream media – remains, to this day, wholly effective. And, as we’ve seen in countless other such similar cases, such psychological spells remain effective chiefly because, upon observing the public embarrassment and humiliation of a single alleged perpetrator, the public will never come to conceive of the idea the mainstream news sources they’ve come to trust routinely fabricate information, and that such egregious activity is always perpetrated, not by entire news organizations, but only by individual journalists.
Ironically though, such stories, of journalists fabricating either stories or sources, are also deliberately conceived fabrications and, from time-to-time, conceived merely to assuage or mitigate the general public’s lingering distrust of authoritative institutions.
Considering the confirmed results of image analysis, including ear biometrics and facial recognition, no one should trust CNN’s “John King” ever again. “John King” is a fabricated character operating under a pseudonym, which, as it turns out, more than hints at his genuine identity. Mister King, in fact, is the hidden spouse of Queen Mathilda AKA American journalist “Jane Pauley”.
King Phillippe of Belgium:
CNN’s John King:
LADY ALEXANDRA?
Ann Coulter first came into the public eye during the late 1990’s, starring as a television news pundit, and quickly rose to greater notoriety as a savage critic of William Jefferson Clinton’s presidential administration. Since one’s loyal readers already know the truth about “Slick” Willie Clinton AKA Hollywood actor Michael Douglas, would it be a safe bet too, that there could be something amiss concerning “Ann Coulter”?
Our suspicions become further exacerbated, when we learn that, before rising to prominence as a television news pundit, Coulter composed legal briefs for the attorneys of “Paula Jones”, the former Arkansas state employee who sued Clinton, alleging she had been the victim of the predatory president’s repeated sexual misconduct and harassment.
Though recorded history tells us, as a result of Jones’s and the allegations of Monica Lewinsky, the president may have been subsequently impeached, Clinton was then, upon further investigation from a congressional committee, strangely acquitted, when he uttered, in the typical fashion of a half-baked protagonist starring in some grade Z made-for-television melodrama, “I did not have sexual relations with that woman!”
Turns out, we have every reason to be suspicious of “Paula Jones”. She too, like the president and her so-called allegations, are proved to have been media-driven canards. “Paula Jones” was a fabricated character, portrayed by a formerly popular figure in Hollywood’s music/entertainment business, Susana Hoffs, the former lead vocalist for the all-girl pop/rock band, the Bangles.
Paula Jones:
Susana Hoffs:
https://binged.it/ 2K9g1Rq
Moving on with our investigation into the official biographies of “Ann Coulter”, we notice telltale elements of – yet again – another fabricated news “journalist”. Coulter’s biographies allege, she was born on the eighth of December (aces and eights/mark of the Jesuits) in 1961 (26/2 6’s/12/21/777/intelligence joker code).
If we begin to examine a photograph, allegedly taken from when Coulter was a matriculating senior at New Canaan High School in 1980, we are able to witness what appears to be evidence of a crudely photo-shopped image:
And folks, if we stretch our memories to the content of a past installment, from where might we have encountered that place name, New Canaan, before?
Could it have been in connection to Brian Williams AKA Prince Stefano Casiraghi of Monaco/Joe Biden/former US president George H.W. Bush?
According to his official biographies, Williams owns a palatial mansion in New Canaan.
SEE: https://virtualglobetrotting.com/map/brian-williams-house-1/view/google/
And while we’re at it, is there anyone who remembers this girl, the alleged surviving sister of James Foley, who was alleged to have been captured and executed by “Isis terrorists”?
In the video clip, displayed above, Coulter has dyed her long mane of hair raven black, and her facial geometry has been altered in post-production with a military-grade CGI animation software package.
Cleverly however, the post-production sound engineers took pains to well-mask her vocal nuances, doubling her speaking voice with a vocal host actor.
Yes folks, would it be any surprise to learn that, like her royal uncle and aunt, Prince Eduard von Furstenberg AKA former Coca-Cola executive and Hollywood mogul Barry Diller/former US president Ike Eisenhower, and Princess Diane von Furstenberg AKA Barbara Walters, she too is a well-experienced and willing participant in the phenomenon we’ve come to recognize as Post-Modern Reality Simulation?
Alexandra von Furstenberg:
Ann Coulter:
2 thoughts on ““Jane Pauley”: Who’s behind the Mask? Part III”