As regular visitors to Newsspell have routinely learned, the phenomenon of Post-Modern Reality Simulation remains the norm rather than the exception.
With this installment, we will be examining the bizarre career of controversial “alt-right” political commentator, polemicist, and public speaker Milo Yiannopoulos.
No folks, Milo is not what he seems.
Banned on American college campuses, as well as routinely excoriated by hosts of keyboard wielding social media/”justice warriors”, Milo (pen named Milo Andreas Wagner) is about to be exposed for what he is: a hidden British royal and an actor playing dress up.
As most of one’s loyal readers have been made aware, America and the West are in the throes of economic transition, of which the current promotion of the climate change, LGBTQ, and feminist social agendas are merely symptomatic.
But if history has taught us anything, every major social movement needs a leading spokesperson to spearhead it and to maneuver public perceptions in the desired directions of those who are secretly in control of the affairs of the US corporation.
And, by now, everyone should know to whom is being referred: the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families.
Although he would never deign to inform the public of his hidden royal genealogy, “Milo Yiannopoulos” currently stands as one such heavily promoted spokesperson.
This is so, because Milo’s hidden family – as major stockholders – not only own the US corporation but also happen to own the MSM.
As evidenced by the title of the video, displayed above, Milo’s act is predicated on the fine art of offending as many people as possible.
To offer a comparative analogy, Milo Yiannopoulos is to the current degenerative state of political commentary and debate what, in the distant past, the Sex Pistol’s Johnny Rotten meant to the utter degradation of popular music.
Yes folks, Milo is pretty vacant, and he doesn’t care.
Or does he?
After viewing several examples of Milo’s outrageous political commentary, it becomes clear the identical template which was used to create the persona of Alex Jones – yet another hidden European royal – was similarly employed during the creation of Yiannopoulos’s persona.
SEE: His Majesty, the clown prince jester
On the one hand, while often outlandishly attired and affecting a bizarre demeanor, Milo’s characterization has been designed to appear sufficiently educated and well- articulated, enough to foster some measure of credibility among his targeted audience of followers.
On the other hand, as in the case of Alex Jones, Milo’s penchant for “offending people” works toward the goal of ostracizing from the political spectrum of debate the very “alt-right” demographic which he’s been designed to attract.
In other words folks, the more ridiculous and outrageous Milo appears, so too will his coterie of “alt-right” followers. Yiannopoulos’s controversial persona is also designed as a mechanism of psychological warfare to condition those populating middle America into sympathetically acquiescing with the plight of the LGBQT movement.
But in the grand scheme of political commentary and debate, the scope of Milo’s characterization and its effects on public perceptions hold greater consequences.
The predominant methodology of Milo’s hidden family, in terms of population control, is order out of chaos.
In this particular case, wherever his hidden family’s hand-picked agent of Marxist political chicanery appears to lead the charge of their well-funded freak parade – whether on television or social media – Milo has proved effective in inciting plenty of chaos.
Continuing on with an examination of Milo’s official biographies, it becomes clear Yiannopoulos’s calculatingly designed characterization derives straight from the bowels of the international intelligence octopus.
Added to that, there exists, of course, the usual examples of gematria coding.
MILO EMPLOYED BY INTELLIGENCE FRONT BREIBART
Allegedly born Milo Hanrahan on the 18th of October, 1984, Yiannopoulos’s apprenticeship as a premiere media provocateur began in 2014, when he was employed by Breitbart News, for which he worked for three years until 2017.
Surely, at this early juncture, everyone can detect the numerological markers embedded in Yiannopoulos’s official biography.
The most obvious of which is the number of 18 (aces and eights/3 6’s=666).
When eighteen is added to the number of October – 8 (aces and eights, mark of the Jesuits) – we get a sum of 26 {2X6=12=21(occult mirrored reversal)=777/intelligence joker code}. There is also, of course, the ubiquitous presence of the number 33 (3/EE=33).
From its earliest beginnings, Breitbart News, according to its founder, Andrew Breitbart, was conceived as an “alt-right” alternative to the left-wing oriented Huffington Post.
This is yet another example of the concept of occult/masonic duality.
By creating what are perceived to be oppositional and polar forces, the two extremes can be greeted to cause chaos from which a culminated new order of affairs can be artificially synthesized. This is a common and featured tactic of both the “alternative” media and the MSM. Both sides are, of course, controlled by Western facets of the international intelligence octopus and were established by the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families to protect their global economic and political interests.
Most biographical accounts of Breitbart’s inception make no secret of its stated goals while openly campaigning for “Donald Trump” (AKA Brian Williams/Stefano Casiraghi Grimaldi of Monaco’s royal family) during the run-up to the US presidential election of 2016. This is enough evidence – in and of itself – to fully support the theoretical assertion Breitbart was created as a tool – with its stated goals to “market ideas of neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups and individuals” – to thoroughly manipulate mass political perceptions.
SEE: Actors Starring as 2020 Presidential Candidates? Part II
Breitbart also served as a valuable training ground for the would-be public persona and future host actor of “Milo Yiannopoulos”. In addition to Breitbart’s “trip to Israel” serving as an impetus for the creation of Breitbart News, Breitbart openly stated the website would be “unapologetically pro-freedom and pro-Israel.” Leaving those obvious contradictions aside, one wonders from where – as we shall discover a bit later – a hidden royal family member would learn the ideological rudiments of feminism.
The answer is evident from a mere glance at the Wikipedia page which details Andrew Breitbart’s media career. During the early 1990’s, according to Wikipedia, Breitbart began reading the works of feminist icon Camille Paglia, specifically Sexual Personae, a literary experience of which he once wrote, “made me realize how little I really had learned in college.”
One expects this realization was related to Breitbart’s agent apprentice and would-be “alt-right” media star, “Milo Yiannopoulos”.
In intelligence circles, this is known as an official brief, when an agent is not only given his bona fides validating the specific credentials of his professional assignment, but becomes trained in the language, politics, and ideological persuasions of the target audience to which the agent of chaos is supposed to appeal.
Undoubtedly, the host actor portraying Alex Jones – as is the case with all other similarly trained intelligence agents of Marxist chaos – graduated from a nearly identical intelligence/media apprenticeship before fully assuming the acting demands of his fabricated public persona.
Part and parcel of establishing this appeal to Yiannopoulos’s target audience was when, in 2016, it became publicly announced Yiannopoulos was banned from both major social media sites, Facebook and Twitter (a revealing expose on the host actor of Facebook founder, Mark Zuckerberg who, as it turns out, is another hidden European royal and a “Rothschild” will be coming very soon).
Prior to his dismissal from Brietbart News, more controversy was soon to follow Yiannopoulos, as he became targeted by accusations of “being an apologist for or supporting of paedophilia”, accusations which acutely jeopardized his position at Breitbart News.
Yiannopoulos addressed the accusations, stating he was not a supporter of such relationships and that his “statements were merely attempts to cope with his own victimhood, as an object of child abuse by unnamed older men.”
According to, once again, Wikipedia, “the allegations arose from several video clips in which he {Yiannopoulos} said that sexual relationships between 13-year-old boys and adult men and women can be ‘perfectly consensual’ and positive experiences for the boys.”
Such allegations, however, did not seem to curb or deter Yiannopoulos’s rapid popular ascendance, as, subsequent to his departure from Breitbart News, he soon became a virtual media darling among major figures within both the alternative media and the MSM.
Rocketing ascendancies to television celebrityhood, such as Yiannopoulos’s, can only become possible with the funding and support of the international intelligence octopus, who have been in complete control of the US media apparatus, on the behalf of the thirteen, ruling elite Jesuit families, since the post-war period (1940’s) of the twentieth century.
YIANNOPOULOS LOWER MIDDLE CLASS?
Yiannopoulos’s official biographies also claim he came from a “lower middle-class” economic background. This sort of biographical template, as we’ve observed many times during past investigations into celebrity personalities, is quite common, and indicates the telltale fingerprints of the international intelligence octopus.
The perpetual utilization of this biographical template, which also represents a key psychological manipulation, fosters the idea among those of similar working class socio-economic backgrounds that anyone – with a little luck and can-do gumption – can become a star.
Of course, this fosters the residual effect of causing those among the working classes to strive harder to transcend their socio-economic limitations, which only results in working longer hours for paychecks only marginally more meager than before, paychecks from which the government can always find an excuse to siphon more tax dollars.
As for Yiannopoulos, his biographies claim, he was formally educated at Simon Langton School for Boys in Canterbury, a school from which he claims he was summarily expelled.
Simon Langton is what has been termed a “blue coat” school, school’s which, historically, were administered by local church parishes for the poor and underprivileged among British society.
Yiannopoulos’s biographies tell us, his experience with higher education didn’t fare much better.
Although he attended University of Manchester, he “dropped out” before graduation. From there, Yiannopoulos went on to “read English” at Wolfson College, Cambridge, but – his biographies tell us – he was “sent down” (expelled).
But when examining Yiannopoulos’s biographies further, we observe a conspicuous anomaly regarding the status of his US residency.
In 2017, it is claimed Yiannopoulos was granted a US resident alien status classified as an O-1 visa.
According to Wikipedia, “an O visa is a classification of a non-immigrant temporary worker visa granted by the United States to an alien who possesses extraordinary ability in the sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics, or who has demonstrated record of extraordinary achievement in the motion picture or television industry and has been recognized nationally or internationally for those achievements, and to certain assistants and immediate family members of such aliens.”
Considering Yiannopoulos had achieved little in the way of “extraordinary achievement” prior to 2017, it seems rather strange the US government would see its way through to bestowing him with such an especial residency status.
Unless, of course, Yiannopoulos were an especially trained agent of chaos working for CIA/MI6.
Undoubtedly, it also stands to reason, Yiannopoulos’s genealogical relations to a certain British royal family may have mightily contributed to being so readily granted such an especial residency status in the US.
After all, any and all manner of privileges are made readily available when your family – Saxe-Coburg-Gotha – is a major stockholder of the US corporation. Especially so, when your host actor’s name is Lord Frederick Windsor, and your father happens to be Prince Michael of Kent, a paternal first cousin of Queen Elisabeth II, and grandson of King George V and Queen Mary.
Milo Yiannopoulos:
Lord Frederick Windsor:
Milo Yiannopoulos:
Lord Frederick Windsor:
Milo Yiannopoulos:
Lord Frederick Windsor:
Milo Yiannopoulos AKA Lord Frederick’s father, Prince Michael of Kent, has also appeared on television as a presenter of documentaries on the royal families of Europe. Both ear biometric and facial recognition analysis prove Prince Michael is also the host actor of John Paul DeJoria, CEO of John Paul Mitchell Systems. One supposes, this also helps to explain how Milo got his especial visa status from the US corporate government.
Like father, like son, huh folks?
Prince Michael, Duke of Kent:
John Paul DeJoria:
The woman, you see placed to John Paul AKA Prince Michael’s left in the image immediately above, is Eloise DeJoria AKA Lady Gabriella Kingston, who is Lord Frederick’s sister and John Paul’s business partner at John Paul Mitchell Systems.
Eloise DeJoria:
Lady Gabriella Kingston:
Hello,
A year long reader, 1st time commenter here just wanted to say thank you brilliant job exposing these frauds. As for “milo” he/she could be larping as time mag journalist “aatish taseer” so called Indian journalist. I bet all so called Indian establishment are EU Royals larping ditto entire Asia, just my 2¢.
Greetings and thank you for your continued interest in Newsspell. I’m not surprised to hear “Milo” could also be posing as an Indian journalist. Investigating “Milo” a bit further, I do believe – though, I cannot yet positively confirm – there are other characters he portrays on American television – ESPN’s Max Kellerman, for example.