Since the beginning of the Covid-19 “pandemic”, top-level health officials around the globe – those such as “Doctor Kerry Chant”, Chief Health Officer of New South Wales – have insisted that the public must put their trust in “THE SCIENCE”.

However, as evidenced by their unfailing and nearly uniform compliance, little did the majority of the public realize, “the science” in which they were being asked to place their collective trust had little to do with biology or virology, but, rather, with sociologically oriented scientific applications of mass behavioral modification which, over the last two years, have been exemplified by the MSM’s ceaselessly manipulative bombardment of the public with psychological warfare.

At the behest of her Vatican Jesuit masters directing the action from the behind the curtain of the world’s stage, Doctor Kerry Chant now appears all-too willing to stoop to any psychologically manipulative means to bamboozle her target audience in New South Wales into never stop believing they should remain perpetually fearful of a “virus” that has never been isolated under proper laboratory conditions and, as shall be further detailed later, does not, in fact, even exist.

To what eventual end?

Is there perhaps an ulterior motive to all of this?

Turns out, there is indeed.

As Doctor Kerry Chant puts it herself at approximately 3:20 in the following video clip, to brainwash the public into accepting a “New World Order”.

Everyone will also take notice of how, at times, “Doctor Kerry Chant” comes dangerously close to losing her composure while mightily attempting not to laugh at the utter absurdity and ridiculous grandiosity of her own scripted talking points.

But, despite this, like any consummate professional actress, “Doctor Kerry Chant” holds her cool, stays in character, and remains “on message”.

From the onset of the Covid-19 “pandemic”, the services of cybersecurity vendors specializing in Behavioral Analytics worked in conjunction with the US corporate government to not only market, promote, and sell the spread of a “deadly virus”, but to measure the public’s compliance index with federal, statutory, and local government mandates.


This should come as no surprise, since the utilization of “nudge units” specializing in behavioral science analytics and connected to Tavistock institute of Human Relations to promote the virulent danger of the “virus” which became known as “SarsCov2” in the UK was previously documented.

Boris the Spider Nudges Public into Web

Behind the Curtain of Boris’s Big Top

While such statements made by the Chief Health Officer of New South Wales could be chalked up to utter hubris, it now appears public officials like “Doctor Kerry Chant” have been given the green light to reveal the true intentions behind scaring the public into believing they are in perpetual danger of contracting “Covid-19”.

But there’s an even deeper deception “Doctor Kerry Chant” will most likely be never allowed to reveal. Further investigation has revealed “Doctor Kerry Chant” isn’t a doctor, but a well-known and accomplished Hollywood actress in disguise.

Upon performing ocular comparisons between the images posted immediately below, everyone will begin to notice, the geometrical architectures of the eyes, brows, noses, nasolabial folds, cheekbones, chins, as well as the landmark and epidermal structures of the necks appear to be identical.

OIP (11)[5711]actor-charlize-theron-475518_large[5709]

In the following pair of images, it can be observed that both the epidermal structures and geometrical proportions of the ears, noses, lips, and protruding front teeth all appear to be all identical.

OIP (9)[5708]OIP (1)[5723]


No matter how dramatically “Doctor Kerry Chant” and other high-level public health officials wish to dress up their urgent and oftentimes hyperbolic warnings about threats of imminent virus transmission and “super-spreader events”, to date, not one of them can verify with substantive peer reviewed documentation that SarsCov2 (AKA coronavirus/Covid-19) nor any of its alleged viral “variants” have properly been isolated under laboratory conditions.

In fact, so far, since 2020, several Freedom of Information Requests, made to various institutions around the world according to a recently published article, have managed to uncover a shocking revelation – there is no record of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification, anywhere, ever.

Regarding this earth-shattering discovery, Christine Massey at poses the following hypothetical question.

“Would a sane person mix a patient sample (containing various sources of genetic material and never proven to contain any alleged “virus”) with transfected monkey kidney cells, fetal bovine serum and toxic drugs, then claim that the resulting concoction is “SARS-COV-2 isolate” and ship it off internationally for use in critical research (including vaccine and test developing)? Because that’s the sort of fraudulent monkey business that’s being passed off as “virus isolation” by research teams around the world.”

More illustratively, Massey goes on to further report, “without the crucial step of isolation/purification having been performed (from many patients, followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments), there is no way to claim scientifically that the alleged “novel coronavirus” (blamed for widespread death/disease/lockdown measures) actually exists. Without this step having been performed and followed by characterization, sequencing and controlled experiments, all claims of this alleged “virus” are nothing, but wild speculation backed only by fraudulent science, fraudulent tests and fraud-based diagnoses.” In fact, of the forty-nine Canadian institutions, four of which previously claimed to have isolated the “virus”, from whom Massey and colleagues requested documented evidence, “every institution has failed to provide or cite even 1 record describing the isolation aka purification of the alleged “Covid-19 virus” directly from a patient that was not first adulterated with other sources of genetic material. (Those other sources are typically monkey kidney aka “Vero” cells and fetal bovine serum).”

Indeed, “THE SCIENCE” public health officials such as “Doctor Kerry Chant” have urged the public to obediently follow turns out to be a complete and utterly fraudulent fabrication.



According to an article published at, in August of 2013, before the Ballina City Council, “Doctor Kerry Chant” was alleged to have argued for the benefits of water fluoridation.

“There is no valid scientific or health evidence that appropriately managed fluoridation of drinking water supplies will cause negative health effects,” Dr. Chant said.

No evidence, Doctor?

Someone should point out to “Doctor Kerry Chant” the extensive findings of Doctor Paul Connett who, in an article published at, not only cites fifty valid reasons as to why water fluoridation – including severe bone damage, fluorosis often misdiagnosed as arthritis – should be considered a bad medical practice, but he also cites the revelations of Doctor Arvid Carlsson, the 2000 Nobel Laureate in Medicine and Physiology and one of the scientists who helped to keep fluoridation out of Sweden’s municipal water supplies.

Then again, though is does seem “Doctor Kerry Chant” remains blissfully unaware there exists no evidence of SARS-COV-2 isolation/purification or that her public advocacy of water fluoridation has been significantly and scientifically contradicted, evidence does exist she may not even be a doctor, evidence derived from the most unlikely of sources – CIA’s spook-ridden Wikipedia.


According to, the exact age of “Doctor Kerry Chant” is “Not Known”.

For someone so famous, that seems kind of odd, no?

Is there no birth certificate or other public records which exist to provide verification?

Odder still, claims the names of Chant’s parents and siblings are also “NOT KNOWN”.

Upon consulting Wikipedia, one immediately notices there isn’t any official birth date for “Doctor Kerry Chant” listed there either.

The only information about the good doctor’s early life is, to say the least, rather paltry.

Wikipedia goes on to report, “Chant grew up in Punchbowl, New South Wales. She attended the Danebank Anglican School for Girls, graduating in 1980.”

Further investigation indicates Danebank is a primary and secondary school for grades K-12.

According to, “in 204 of 206 countries, children enter primary school between 5 and 7 years of age. Exceptions are in Ireland, where primary school begins at 8 years. In 127 countries, the official primary school entrance age is 6 years.”

In Australia, in quite similar fashion to the US, school begins with six years of Primary Education (Year 1 to Year 6) followed by six years of secondary school (Year 7 to Year 12). The New South Wales (NSW) school system is Australia’s largest educational system. There are more than 200 primary and secondary schools. One can therefore reasonably estimate, upon graduating from Danebank in 1980, Chant must have been between 16 and 18 years of age, which approximately pinpoints her DOB to have been in the mid-to late 1960’s, meaning that, presently, “Doctor Kerry Chant” could be aged anywhere from mid to late 50’s.

Regarding her record of higher education, Wikipedia informs that after graduation from Danebank, “Doctor Kerry Chant” did not immediately go on to attend college.

Instead, “She worked in retail jobs and a pharmacy before studying medicine.”

Regarding her period of higher education, which presumably commenced circa 1983, Wikipedia informs, “She {Chant} attended the University of New South Wales where she completed a Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery in 1987, a Master of Health Administration in 1991 and a Master of Public Health in 1995.”

Alas, there is no indication from Wikipedia or other official biographical sources that Chant went on to acquire a doctorate in medicine.

Which raises a pertinent question: lacking proper certification or accredited degree, how is it that “Kerry Chant” can call herself a doctor?

Could it be, “Doctor Kerry Chant” is not a doctor, but a media driven intelligence-created fabricated character scheme portrayed by a live-action role player, one who is an accomplished, highly regarded, and award-winning Hollywood actress, one who has also been identified in portrayal of other high-profile roles – such as “Chelsea Clinton” (AKA Natalie Hollway)?

Below: Chelsea Clinton, Natallie Holloway


SEE: New York Post’s Covert Revelations

Chelsea Clinton’s Three-Ringed CGI Circus


Gematria analysis of the name “Kerry Chant” turned up telltale but, as has been the case with so many other investigations, predictable results.

Respectively, in English Ordinal and Full Reduction, “Kerry Chant” sums to 123 and 51. Both of these ciphers reduce to 6.

In Reverse Ordinal and Reverse Full Reduction, the name of “Kerry Chant” respectively sums to 147 and 57, both ciphers of which reduce to 3. Together, these reduction ciphers add up to 3 6’s or 666.


Beginning at approximately 40 seconds of the video excerpt posted above, everyone will notice the sweeping and dramatic hand gestures utilized by the featured talk show guest, Hollywood actress Charleze Theron.

In the following video excerpt, during one of her more animated moments, everyone will also begin to notice that “Doctor Kerry Chant” employs similar or identical hand gestures.

To mitigate this telltale tendency, and to further prevent identification of her host actor (live-action role player), “Doctor Kerry Chant” can be observed in the following video clip clutching a sheaf of papers as a prop.

A comparison analysis of the hands featured in the following pair of images demonstrates the length of the fingers, as well as vein and epidermal landmark patterns appear to be similar if not identical.

During the majority of her public appearances, “Doctor Kerry Chant” can be observed with eyewear. As we’ve discovered from prior investigations, brands of customized eyewear are utilized as props to distort the public’s ocular perceptions and to better hide the identity of the live-action role player in portrayal of the fabricated character scheme.

Despite this, close examination of both the brows and eyes in the pair of images posted below demonstrate identical geometric and structural characteristics. The identical structures of the noses, lips, and chins – between “Doctor Kerry Chant” and her live-action role player, Hollywood actress Charleze Theron (AKA Chelsea Clinton/Natalie Hollway) appear to be quite evident. Their respective hairlines also appear to be identical.

Below from L to R: Doctor Kerry Chant, Charleze Theron

OIP (9)[5708]OIP (1)[5723]

As to how Charleze Theron is so easily able to approximate or mimic the regional Australian accent common to New South Wales, it should be noted that all press conferences featuring high-level public officials are thoroughly scripted, highly controlled and contained events, comparable to the closeted and highly secure conditions one would expect surrounding a Hollywood movie set. As was noted in a previous article – SEE: Steve Bannon’s Transparent Political Theater – Face2Face Real-Time Capture and Reenactment is often routinely utilized in tandem with actor’s performances.

Further and extensive ear biometric, facial recognition, and image comparison analyses indicates that, indeed, “Doctor Kerry Chant” is a fabricated character scheme portrayed by Charleze Theron (AKA Chelsea Clinton/Natalie Hollway), the hidden daughter of Warren Beatty (AKA Richard Nixon/George Hamilton/John McCain/Rudy Giuliani/Robert McNamara/Colin Powell) and Annette Bening (AKA Hillary Clinton/Elizabeth Warren/Jennifer Granholm/Sharon Stone/Doctor Deborah Birx), both of whom, of course, have proved to be repeat perpetrators of Post-Modern Reality Simulation.

SEE: Birx another brick in the Masonic Wall?

Powell Was One Very Tricky Dick

Sky News Anchor’s Sly Masquerade

SOE Confirms: America Under Siege Warfare

Question is – are you going to allow these actors to seduce you into accepting the “New World Order” proposed by the likes of a grand fraudster such as “Doctor Kerry Chant”?

3 thoughts on “Doctor Kerry Chant’s New World Order

  1. Just wanted to thank you for another inciteful article. Also wanted to share this link with your readers:

    It is a 1972 US Naval sponsored study on the effects of 5G. Some of the effects are bad hair days and a disparity in male/female population. After page 13, everything is a bibliography. Thanks!

    1. Thanks for kindly providing the pdf link. I’ll take a look at it. My next article will contain revelations as to the structure of the social credit/economic system now being implemented.

Leave a Reply